293:
I'd prefer to do it that way too, especially because non-admins can't tell what the previous, deleted content was. The text at the bottom "Even though the page
Chester Yeah! has been deleted, here is what it said, Chester See should be Chester Yeah!" would be the reason I'd flag it for a speedy,
226:
OK...this page was AFDed last fall and the result was delete. Recently the page has been created again and numerous other versions (e.g., Chester Yeah!, Chester Yeah, etc.) have been redirected to it. The underlying problems are that it's a poorly sourced BLP, not notable per
278:
I tend to agree, though the reason I tagged it for AFD rather than CSD is that it had previously been removed through AFD, so I figured it would be good to ensure consensus before giving it the boot for the second
339:
I agree, but as I said in both my nomination and above, I just felt more comfortable ensuring community consensus rather than a simple tag...though it was tagged and a terrific dissension was posted on the talk
195:
378:- Per A7 for practically the bazillionth time. With all the recreations, I wouldn't be surprised if the next recreation would be named "Chester No", "Chester Maybe", "Chester Ees", I mean, the list goes on!
96:
150:
189:
155:
91:
431:
386:
123:
118:
17:
443:
398:
370:
349:
330:
303:
288:
269:
255:
240:
75:
127:
210:
177:
110:
321:
case given there's no contest about the repetition of a deleted article. Failing that, just delete it as not notable.
462:
40:
171:
345:
326:
284:
236:
64:
458:
362:
295:
261:
251:
167:
36:
436:
391:
420:
416:
217:
203:
412:
341:
322:
280:
232:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
457:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
247:
114:
72:
426:
408:
381:
183:
57:
53:
144:
260:
The author has admitted it being the same content, so this should get speedied.
228:
106:
81:
423:, which pretty much would extend the Chester See article creation program.
451:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
140:
136:
132:
202:
231:
and has an inexplicable
Chester Yeah section at the
97:Articles for deletion/Chester See (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
465:). No further edits should be made to this page.
216:
8:
411:has created some redirects to this page,
89:
7:
246:It should be speedily deleted then.
88:
24:
92:Articles for deletion/Chester See
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
444:13:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
399:13:01, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
371:12:49, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
350:12:42, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
331:09:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
317:- this looks an open-and-shut
304:03:47, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
289:03:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
270:03:16, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
256:02:58, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
241:02:53, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
76:13:22, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
482:
454:Please do not modify it.
294:let's see what happens.
32:Please do not modify it.
87:AfDs for this article:
60:. (Non-admin closure)
473:
456:
441:
439:
434:
429:
396:
394:
389:
384:
368:
365:
358:For the record,
301:
298:
267:
264:
221:
220:
206:
158:
148:
130:
70:
67:
56:under criterion
50:speedily deleted
34:
481:
480:
476:
475:
474:
472:
471:
470:
469:
463:deletion review
452:
437:
432:
427:
425:
409:User:Dragon Loy
392:
387:
382:
380:
366:
363:
299:
296:
265:
262:
163:
154:
121:
105:
102:
85:
65:
62:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
479:
477:
468:
467:
448:
447:
446:
402:
401:
373:
355:
354:
353:
352:
334:
333:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
273:
272:
258:
224:
223:
160:
101:
100:
99:
94:
86:
84:
79:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
478:
466:
464:
460:
455:
449:
445:
442:
440:
435:
430:
422:
421:Chester Yeah!
418:
417:Chester Thing
414:
410:
406:
405:
404:
403:
400:
397:
395:
390:
385:
377:
376:Speedy delete
374:
372:
369:
361:
357:
356:
351:
347:
343:
342:Go Phightins!
338:
337:
336:
335:
332:
328:
324:
323:Chiswick Chap
320:
316:
313:
312:
305:
302:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
281:Go Phightins!
277:
276:
275:
274:
271:
268:
259:
257:
253:
249:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
233:Go Phightins!
230:
219:
215:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
169:
166:
165:Find sources:
161:
157:
152:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
125:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:
98:
95:
93:
90:
83:
80:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
453:
450:
424:
413:Chester Yeah
407:Apparently,
379:
375:
359:
318:
314:
225:
213:
207:
199:
192:
186:
180:
174:
164:
61:
54:User:Kudpung
49:
47:
31:
28:
248:JoshuSasori
190:free images
107:Chester See
82:Chester See
459:talk page
37:talk page
461:or in a
367:Thompson
364:Matthew
300:Thompson
297:Matthew
266:Thompson
263:Matthew
151:View log
39:or in a
340:page...
196:WP refs
184:scholar
124:protect
119:history
419:, and
360:delete
319:Speedy
315:Delete
279:time--
168:Google
128:delete
66:Pepper
428:Zappa
383:Zappa
211:JSTOR
172:books
156:Stats
145:views
137:watch
133:links
16:<
438:Mati
393:Mati
346:talk
327:talk
285:talk
252:talk
237:talk
229:WP:N
204:FENS
178:news
141:logs
115:talk
111:edit
218:TWL
153:•
149:– (
52:by
415:,
348:)
329:)
287:)
254:)
239:)
198:)
143:|
139:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
117:|
113:|
58:G4
433:O
388:O
344:(
325:(
283:(
250:(
235:(
222:)
214:·
208:·
200:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
170:(
162:(
159:)
147:)
109:(
73:@
69:"
63:"
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.