458:
One of the fundamental requirements for establishing notability is that the references must be intellectually independent - perhaps with some independent opinions or analysis included in the reference. In my opinion, only your fourth reference from people.com comes close - and its a gossip column with unsubstantiated details that should not (cannot?) be relied on (unreliable).
202:
Entirely promotional, no indications of notability. References fail the criteria for establishing notability as they rely either exclusively on PRIMARY sources (interviews), or are unreliable or unestablished sources (e.g. Weekbit) or are unattributed references that request submissions for profiling
457:
Some references that fail the criteria for establishing notability can, in fact, be used to substantiate claims and this essay appears to address this aspect when fact-checking articles. A smaller subset of those same references meet the criteria for establishing notability which is a stricter bar.
434:
Some interviews combine both primary and secondary material, very similar to a book that contains well-researched content in addition to autobiographical material. In general, written interviews published by reliable sources are not simple transcripts, but are edited by the publishing organization,
334:
This coverage is significant because it "addresses the topic directly and in detail", reliable because these are major publishers with demonstrated "editorial integrity", and independent because they are secondary sources synthesized from interviews with Guzman. Taken altogether, the
168:
413:
other works in which the company, corporation, organization, or group talks about itself—whether published by the company, corporation, organization, or group itself, or re-printed by other people
366:
You say "they are secondary sources synthesized from interviews with Guzman" and that's the problem. They aren't "synthesized" enough. There's no independent opinion and analyis.
121:
255:
162:
300:
for inclusion within
Knowledge require that the subject of the article has received significant third-party coverage. Guzman has been covered as the primary subject by:
274:
379:
I disagree. The articles are not transcripts of interviews and they have their own authors. They are secondary synthesis of information from primary interviews.
236:
52:. This is very close to a delete consensus but I am erring on the side of caution. No unique controversy that would warrant an extraordinary third relist.
128:
94:
89:
98:
81:
318:
307:
183:
17:
150:
547:
485:
144:
581:
534:
326:
40:
562:
538:
529:
published interviews with a subject are not indepdent, 3rd-party reliable sources, not enough to pass the GNG.
521:
502:
466:
452:
423:
394:
374:
354:
285:
266:
247:
228:
211:
63:
140:
85:
224:
577:
558:
445:
387:
347:
190:
36:
415:. I can't explain it any better. You say the interviews are not transcripts - but that isn't the test.
77:
69:
530:
437:" These sources discuss Guzman and use material from an interview to provide additional quotations.
429:
400:
176:
517:
313:
496:
279:
260:
241:
220:
156:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
576:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
439:
408:
381:
341:
303:
322:
513:
459:
416:
367:
336:
297:
204:
53:
115:
570:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
550:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
488:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
405:
quotations from an organization's personnel as story sources
306:(one of the top publishers in the bodybuilding world):
111:
107:
103:
175:
407:
fail the criteria for establishing notability. From
556:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
512:Good discussion but Malinaccier has won me over. -
494:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
256:list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
584:). No further edits should be made to this page.
275:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
189:
8:
273:Note: This debate has been included in the
254:Note: This debate has been included in the
235:Note: This debate has been included in the
428:There is an essay about interviews. From
272:
253:
237:list of Texas-related deletion discussions
234:
435:and this may qualify them as secondary.
7:
24:
312:Train Magazine (cover athlete):
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
563:16:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
539:04:34, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
522:19:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
503:19:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
467:21:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
453:18:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
424:23:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
395:17:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
375:16:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
355:19:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
286:18:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
267:18:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
248:18:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
229:15:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
212:18:41, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
1:
337:general notability guidelines
298:general notability guidelines
203:(e.g. greatestphysiques.com)
339:are satisfied word by word.
64:09:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
601:
573:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
317:Houstonia Magazine:
565:
531:John Pack Lambert
505:
288:
269:
250:
592:
575:
561:
555:
553:
551:
501:
493:
491:
489:
464:
448:
442:
421:
390:
384:
372:
350:
344:
304:Bodybuilding.com
284:
265:
246:
209:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
78:Christian Guzman
70:Christian Guzman
61:
57:
34:
600:
599:
595:
594:
593:
591:
590:
589:
588:
582:deletion review
571:
566:
557:
546:
544:
506:
495:
484:
482:
460:
446:
440:
417:
388:
382:
368:
348:
342:
323:People Magazine
278:
259:
240:
205:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
59:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
598:
596:
587:
586:
554:
543:
542:
541:
524:
492:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
358:
357:
331:
330:
329:
328:
320:
315:
310:
290:
289:
270:
251:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
597:
585:
583:
579:
574:
568:
567:
564:
560:
559:North America
552:
549:
540:
536:
532:
528:
525:
523:
519:
515:
511:
508:
507:
504:
500:
499:
490:
487:
468:
465:
463:
456:
455:
454:
451:
449:
443:
436:
431:
427:
426:
425:
422:
420:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
393:
391:
385:
378:
377:
376:
373:
371:
365:
362:
361:
360:
359:
356:
353:
351:
345:
338:
333:
332:
327:
324:
321:
319:
316:
314:
311:
308:
305:
302:
301:
299:
295:
292:
291:
287:
283:
282:
276:
271:
268:
264:
263:
257:
252:
249:
245:
244:
238:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
213:
210:
208:
201:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
572:
569:
545:
526:
509:
498:CAPTAIN RAJU
497:
483:
461:
438:
433:
430:WP:INTERVIEW
418:
412:
404:
401:WP:CORPDEPTH
380:
369:
363:
340:
293:
281:CAPTAIN RAJU
280:
262:CAPTAIN RAJU
261:
243:CAPTAIN RAJU
242:
221:Bluebonnet07
219:Promotional
216:
215:
206:
199:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
54:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
462:-- HighKing
441:Malinaccier
419:-- HighKing
383:Malinaccier
370:-- HighKing
343:Malinaccier
207:-- HighKing
163:free images
578:talk page
409:WP:ORGIND
37:talk page
580:or in a
548:Relisted
514:Ret.Prof
486:Relisted
122:View log
39:or in a
399:As per
364:Comment
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
527:Delete
296:. The
217:Delete
200:Delete
141:Google
99:delete
510:Keep:
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
60:Train
16:<
535:talk
518:talk
447:talk
389:talk
349:talk
294:Keep
225:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
432:: "
191:TWL
120:– (
537:)
520:)
411:,
403:,
325::
277:.
258:.
239:.
227:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
533:(
516:(
450:)
444:(
392:)
386:(
352:)
346:(
309:.
223:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
56:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.