177:
225:
171:
130:
371:
351:
299:
494:
Number of sources appear to confirm notability. Just because an article is promotional does not justify its deletion, it justifies it cleanup. Also, as
208:
Not notable for
Knowledge, just personal promotion/PR, article contains errors, links only to own personal Linkedin page and her company website
137:
103:
98:
107:
477:- It looks like she's reasonably notable. There may be issues with the article needing some clean-up, but this isn't the place for that.
90:
420:
192:
17:
159:
266:
298:
or at best weak keep as LaMona said (but draft & userfy if needed) as my searches found nothing convincingly good,
278:
482:
463:
449:
433:
416:
153:
526:
40:
507:
486:
467:
453:
424:
407:
383:
363:
342:
325:
320:
290:
257:
235:
217:
67:
333:— she has multiple articles on her in national publications. I have added more references to some of these. —
149:
503:
478:
232:
94:
246:"of of the Future 100 Young Entrepreneurs Of The Year" is in our terms an unmistakable "not yet notable"
522:
459:
445:
199:
36:
314:. As I mentioned the possible drafting and userfying, maybe Jpbowen wants to save it in his userspace.
315:
270:
185:
213:
61:
499:
403:
379:
359:
338:
303:
229:
165:
86:
73:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
521:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
495:
286:
55:
498:
makes clear, a nom should search for sources first, not simply nominate for deletion
395:
307:
253:
209:
399:
375:
355:
334:
311:
124:
282:
274:
248:
415:. Current version of article clearly demonstrates the GNG is satisfied.
265:
I'm finding more recent sources, so the article is in need of updating:
306:(best results I found aside from a passing mention at Books). BTW,
515:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
444:
To allow more time for discussion given recent improvements.
436:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
310:
it seems you never notified the author (who is still active)
281:. There's probably more - this was just a quick G-search.
120:
116:
112:
184:
458:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
226:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
529:). No further edits should be made to this page.
198:
8:
372:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions
370:Note: This debate has been included in the
352:list of England-related deletion discussions
350:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:Note: This debate has been included in the
369:
349:
223:
417:The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo)
7:
80:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
508:03:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
487:23:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
468:22:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
454:22:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
425:20:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
408:16:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
384:14:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
364:14:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
343:18:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
326:06:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
291:16:48, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
258:02:16, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
236:14:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
218:14:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
68:15:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
546:
518:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
79:AfDs for this article:
442:Relisting comment:
479:CoffeeWithMarkets
470:
386:
366:
238:
87:Claire Watt-Smith
74:Claire Watt-Smith
59:
56:non-admin closure
537:
520:
457:
439:
437:
323:
318:
275:Management today
203:
202:
188:
140:
128:
110:
64:
62:
53:
34:
545:
544:
540:
539:
538:
536:
535:
534:
533:
527:deletion review
516:
471:
432:
430:
321:
316:
145:
136:
101:
85:
82:
77:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
543:
541:
532:
531:
511:
510:
489:
456:
440:
429:
428:
427:
410:
388:
387:
367:
346:
345:
335:Jonathan Bowen
328:
317:SwisterTwister
296:Delete for now
293:
260:
240:
239:
206:
205:
142:
81:
78:
76:
71:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
542:
530:
528:
524:
519:
513:
512:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
488:
484:
480:
476:
473:
472:
469:
465:
461:
455:
451:
447:
443:
438:
435:
426:
422:
418:
414:
411:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
390:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
368:
365:
361:
357:
353:
348:
347:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
327:
324:
319:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
259:
255:
251:
250:
245:
242:
241:
237:
234:
231:
227:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
75:
72:
70:
69:
66:
65:
63:Esquivalience
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
517:
514:
500:AusLondonder
491:
474:
441:
431:
412:
391:
330:
295:
279:Marie Claire
271:Sunday Times
267:The Industry
262:
247:
243:
230:Everymorning
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
133:
60:
49:
47:
31:
28:
172:free images
523:talk page
496:WP:BEFORE
460:T. Canens
446:T. Canens
376:• Gene93k
356:• Gene93k
263:Weak keep
37:talk page
525:or in a
434:Relisted
308:Sheroddy
210:Sheroddy
131:View log
39:or in a
400:Bearian
312:Jpbowen
244:Delete.
178:WP refs
166:scholar
104:protect
99:history
396:WP:HEY
283:LaMona
233:(talk)
150:Google
108:delete
254:talk
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
504:talk
492:Keep
483:talk
475:Keep
464:talk
450:talk
421:talk
413:Keep
404:talk
394:per
392:Keep
380:talk
360:talk
339:talk
331:Keep
322:talk
304:this
302:and
300:this
287:talk
214:talk
186:FENS
160:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
50:keep
249:DGG
200:TWL
129:– (
52:.
506:)
485:)
466:)
452:)
423:)
406:)
398:.
382:)
374:.
362:)
354:.
341:)
289:)
277:,
273:,
269:,
256:)
228:.
216:)
180:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
502:(
481:(
462:(
448:(
419:(
402:(
378:(
358:(
337:(
285:(
252:(
212:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
134:·
127:)
89:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.