Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/AIM Ad Hack - Knowledge

Source 📝

280:
to Yelllowiki.org. Widely distributed doesn't mean notable, esp. on the internet. If that tiny bit of info is all there is to say about the product, it shouldn't be here. "Depth of coverage" is as important to establishing notability as # of sources. I think it's awesome Ihcoyc jumped in to help and
253:
I think you mean db-author; but now that others are interested and have sources to add, we see another example of the benefits of collaboration on a wiki. Looking at the search above, about 1 in 20 usable, but that's still a good
294:. I added the sources myself - and I will continue to work on the article if you all believe it fits the criteria for inclusion. Thanks for the support, and I would appreciate if anyone else can add sources! -- 205: 306:
I would like to comment that if this is allowed through, it may allow other third party addons to remain in place. But the article is rather nice from my point of view.
119: 153:
I don't see that every day. I wasn't going to insist on it, but given the fact that there are no sources as of now, the author's request should be honored.
268:. Sources have been added; the software itself is an add-on for a very widely distributed piece of software; it seems to be notable enough to pass. - 164:
I'm not particularly inclined to delete it myself, I just wanted to see if other editors think it should be deleted, due to the lack of sources. --
348:. Obviously it would be nice if there were relevant sources - maybe information could be pulled from the organizations that gave it its awards? 92: 87: 17: 96: 320:
Remember, "if X article exists then should Y" is not a criteria for inclusion, so I wouldn't worry about that too much. --
79: 367: 36: 366:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
139:
Is it possible to withdraw an AfD nomination? I feel I can contribute to this article quite well now. --
352: 336: 324: 313: 298: 285: 272: 260: 245: 215: 193: 168: 157: 143: 133: 61: 228: 154: 212: 349: 187: 55: 333: 310: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
83: 239: 224: 182: 50: 281:
did good work, but I don't see how there's any way to make this Knowledge material.
330: 307: 208: 113: 282: 269: 175:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
75: 67: 207:
for the software yields 18k ghits. I'd like to see more sources that meet
321: 295: 256: 165: 140: 130: 223:
As the main editor of the article, you may requested speedy delete per
126:
I am nominating this article (which I created myself) for deletion
360:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
288:(Jiminy Christmas, I hate it when I forget to sign *lol*) 109: 105: 101: 211:
but not a huge deal for obviously popular software.
128:
because I was unable to find relevant sources for it
180:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 370:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 387: 353:17:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 337:23:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 325:22:57, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 314:22:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 299:22:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 286:17:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 273:14:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 261:03:57, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 246:03:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 216:02:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC) 194:23:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC) 169:01:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 158:01:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC) 134:23:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 363:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 144:00:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 62:04:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 329:Changed vote then 242: 237: 196: 378: 365: 240: 235: 233: 204:An exact search 192: 179: 176: 117: 99: 60: 34: 386: 385: 381: 380: 379: 377: 376: 375: 374: 368:deletion review 361: 270:Smerdis of Tlön 244: 229: 181: 174: 90: 74: 71: 49: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 384: 382: 373: 372: 356: 355: 342: 341: 340: 339: 317: 316: 301: 289: 275: 263: 248: 238: 218: 198: 197: 178: 171: 161: 160: 147: 146: 124: 123: 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 383: 371: 369: 364: 358: 357: 354: 351: 347: 344: 343: 338: 335: 332: 328: 327: 326: 323: 319: 318: 315: 312: 309: 305: 302: 300: 297: 293: 290: 287: 284: 279: 276: 274: 271: 267: 264: 262: 259: 258: 252: 249: 247: 243: 234: 232: 226: 222: 219: 217: 214: 210: 206: 203: 200: 199: 195: 191: 190: 186: 185: 177: 172: 170: 167: 163: 162: 159: 156: 152: 149: 148: 145: 142: 138: 137: 136: 135: 132: 129: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 58: 54: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 362: 359: 345: 303: 291: 277: 265: 255: 250: 230: 220: 201: 188: 183: 173: 150: 127: 125: 56: 51: 45: 43: 31: 28: 76:AIM Ad Hack 68:AIM Ad Hack 241:Need help? 231:Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť 155:YechielMan 350:r.y.right 346:Weak Keep 278:Transwiki 213:Darkspots 202:Weak keep 120:View log 304:Neutral 225:WP:SNOW 221:Comment 93:protect 88:history 283:Wysdom 189:scribe 97:delete 57:scribe 209:WP:RS 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 334:tchy 311:tchy 292:Keep 266:Keep 254:many 251:Keep 151:Wow. 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 46:keep 331:Whs 322:Ali 308:Whs 296:Ali 257:DGG 236:or 184:WjB 166:Ali 141:Ali 131:Ali 118:– ( 52:WjB 227:. 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 48:. 122:) 116:) 78:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
WjB
scribe
04:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
AIM Ad Hack
AIM Ad Hack
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Ali
23:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Ali
00:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
YechielMan
01:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Ali
01:11, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
WjB
scribe
23:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:RS

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.