452:
of ankhegs, as it mentions ankhegs only once, and the only thing it tells us about them is that they were designed by Erol Otus. It doesn't address the ankhegs directly and in detail, making it insufficient to establish the topic's notability. The other source, a
Computer Gaming World article, is not
422:
and the open gaming license, which allowed other publishers a license to use WotC owned concepts. They weren't an actual discussion about the creatures, or anything that would indicate real world notability, they were just in-universe usage of the creature in games. The only non-primary source I'm
470:
I am starting to think we should do away with all articles specifically on D&D things. We can have a general article on the monsters without being either an exhaustive list or giving too much detail, and if the thing being in D&D is notable, we can include material on that on a more general
368:
They were mostly staunch inclusionists and involved D&D editors. As many like minded people advocating for deletion can result in an article that actually has potential being removed, many like minded people can argue for a horrible keep stance. There is no real validity whatsoever in their
268:, lacking significant non-primary sources. It seems the previous AfD keeps argued that appearing in other games counts, but that's in no way significant considering the many usages of monsters inspired by D&D over the decades.
348:. I know consensus can change but the arguments regarding the non-primary sources that resulted in two past Keep decisions appear to still apply, so I'm not sure why the third time around should be any different. —
233:
285:
91:
86:
186:
325:
227:
305:
133:
118:
193:
81:
458:
400:
391:
users who !voted "keep" in previous
Dungeons & Dragons-related deletion discussions into that discussion, compromising the
113:
106:
17:
480:
462:
436:
404:
378:
359:
337:
317:
297:
277:
64:
127:
123:
248:
418:- The sources used in the prior AFD as claims of independent sources are just two game products published under the
215:
159:
154:
497:
476:
454:
396:
392:
163:
40:
449:
445:
146:
493:
453:
enough to establish notability alone, as multiple sources are generally needed to establish notability.
354:
209:
36:
472:
388:
333:
387:
Aslo, the previous AfD can hardly even be called a "consensus", as user 129.33.19.254 seems to have
432:
241:
205:
255:
102:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
492:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
349:
329:
428:
55:
374:
313:
293:
273:
265:
427:
which, as usual, is just a guide describing the creature as it exists in the game.
221:
471:
article on the topic, but we should not have articles just on a monster in D&D.
180:
150:
419:
370:
309:
289:
269:
444:
The article currently cites two non-primary sources. The first one, "
142:
70:
488:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
286:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
176:
172:
168:
240:
423:finding that isn't just a game book is the usual
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
500:). No further edits should be made to this page.
324:Note: This discussion has been included in the
304:Note: This discussion has been included in the
284:Note: This discussion has been included in the
254:
92:Articles for deletion/Ankheg (3rd nomination)
87:Articles for deletion/Ankheg (2nd nomination)
8:
326:list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions
134:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
446:An interview with fantasy artist Erol Otus
323:
306:list of Games-related deletion discussions
303:
283:
79:
7:
425:The Monsters Know What They're Doing
77:
24:
119:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
65:19:29, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
481:14:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
463:06:10, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
437:16:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
405:06:25, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
379:14:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
360:14:41, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
338:13:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
318:12:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
298:12:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
278:12:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
82:Articles for deletion/Ankheg
109:(AfD)? Read these primers!
517:
393:consensus decision-making
490:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
455:Not a very active user
397:Not a very active user
76:AfDs for this article:
107:Articles for deletion
264:The article fails
473:John Pack Lambert
340:
320:
300:
124:Guide to deletion
114:How to contribute
63:
508:
259:
258:
244:
196:
184:
166:
104:
62:
60:
53:
34:
516:
515:
511:
510:
509:
507:
506:
505:
504:
498:deletion review
450:trivial mention
201:
192:
157:
141:
138:
101:
98:
96:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
514:
512:
503:
502:
484:
483:
465:
448:" is merely a
439:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
382:
381:
363:
362:
342:
341:
321:
301:
262:
261:
198:
137:
136:
131:
121:
116:
99:
97:
95:
94:
89:
84:
78:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
513:
501:
499:
495:
491:
486:
485:
482:
478:
474:
469:
466:
464:
460:
456:
451:
447:
443:
440:
438:
434:
430:
426:
421:
417:
414:
413:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
384:
383:
380:
376:
372:
367:
366:
365:
364:
361:
358:
357:
353:
352:
347:
344:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
322:
319:
315:
311:
307:
302:
299:
295:
291:
287:
282:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
257:
253:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
214:
211:
207:
204:
203:Find sources:
199:
195:
191:
188:
182:
178:
174:
170:
165:
161:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
139:
135:
132:
129:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
111:
110:
108:
103:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
489:
487:
467:
441:
424:
415:
355:
350:
345:
263:
251:
245:
237:
230:
224:
218:
212:
202:
189:
100:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
228:free images
420:d20 System
369:argument.
330:Necrothesp
58:Sandstein
494:talk page
429:Rorshacma
395:process.
389:canvassed
37:talk page
496:or in a
187:View log
128:glossary
39:or in a
442:Delete.
234:WP refs
222:scholar
160:protect
155:history
105:New to
468:Delete
416:Delete
351:Hunter
266:WP:GNG
206:Google
164:delete
143:Ankheg
71:Ankheg
50:delete
249:JSTOR
210:books
194:Stats
181:views
173:watch
169:links
16:<
477:talk
459:talk
433:talk
401:talk
375:talk
356:Kahn
346:Keep
334:talk
314:talk
294:talk
274:talk
242:FENS
216:news
177:logs
151:talk
147:edit
371:TTN
310:TTN
290:TTN
270:TTN
256:TWL
185:– (
479:)
461:)
435:)
403:)
377:)
336:)
328:.
316:)
308:.
296:)
288:.
276:)
236:)
179:|
175:|
171:|
167:|
162:|
158:|
153:|
149:|
52:.
475:(
457:(
431:(
399:(
373:(
332:(
312:(
292:(
272:(
260:)
252:·
246:·
238:·
231:·
225:·
219:·
213:·
208:(
200:(
197:)
190:·
183:)
145:(
130:)
126:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.