245:: none of the references currently in the article constitute significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. #1, #6, and #9 are database entries. #2, #3, and #4 are interviews/profiles on sketchy websites. (Please note that these are NSFW.) #10 is a gimmicky listicle of pornographic performers' political views which includes a short quote from Ms. Peaks. The remaining refs are industry award rosters or press releases: the awards don't count towards anything now that PORNBIO has been deprecated. I looked for additional sources and didn't find significant biographical coverage, only several other gimmick "pornographic actors share their views on Foo" articles with quotes from her, some based on the youtube series "Ask A Pornstar":
563:. The rationale behind PORNBIO (as with other SNG's) was that reliable source coverage would likely be found eventually. I subscribed to that belief myself. However, after 12 years, consensus is that the PORNBIO rationale does not hold water. Even when PORNBIO was in effect, award nominations were removed because award ceremonies (AVN especially) tend to nominate almost everybody for something. AFAIK, the Inked Award never met the "well-known and significant industry award" test in PORNBIO or even the ultra-permissive award-has-a-Knowledge-article test of 12 years ago.
712:
for bombing the net with self promotion. Internet flooding was a concern written into the original PORNBIO guideline way back in 2006. Porn can be notable, but it needs coverage by trustworthy sources. The new consensus is that exempting porn from regular demands for quality sources was bad policy. It's not about bureaucracy, it's about
Knowledge's maturing as a credible reference work.
519:. I have no idea how significant the YNOT cam award ceremony is within the pornography industry, but the announcements/advertisements for it don't amount to independent coverage of Ms. Peaks. The other sources you've suggested are more gimmicky "pornstar opinions on Foo" articles, mainly tabloid churnalism of the "Ask a Porn Star" youtube series: for instance, the
587:
I agree on most of the points presented by both of you. But it is not an isolated coverage. The subject/Peaks receiving coverage is a routine thing, persistence. That is something for a person from porn industry. Also, (for a pornstar) 1 million followers is quite a fanbase, as stated by few sources.
422:
Last year Anna won
Perfect Pussy and Best Girl/Girl Scene with Felicity Feline for Brazzers’ “Bloodthirsty Biker Babes.” In 2017 she took home trophies for Best Tits, Best Model Website, Scene of the Year with Small Hands for Squirt or Die (BurningAngel), and Best Group Scene with Nikki Hearts, Leigh
711:
It is not wikilawyering to state the PORNBIO is dead and that it was killed for good reasons. And to restate an important point: porn awards are considered self promotion by the porn industry. Counts of
Twitter followers are controversial even in the mainstream, never mind in an industry notorious
554:
is expressly banned as a reference for verification of facts or as evidence of notability. The other sources, as the nominator states, are "ask a pornstar" quotations constitute trivial coverage. As for awards, without acknowledgement of an achievement by independent reliable sources, they don't
739:
I do not know why anybody is discussing PORNBIO since it no longer exists. I agree with Gene93k. According to our current standards, which are the only standards that count now, this person is not notable. A "million followers' is marketing baloney in the age of lying bots, fake social media
416:
And indeed, there are multiple non trivial coverage about her. But it is a little difficult to find using conventional search engines. If one turns off the "safe search", and enables explicit content; then they would see many results. According to
381:. The award wins didn't count even when WP:PORNBIO was in effect. The article fails to cite non-trivial coverage by independent reliable sources. My own search for sources makes me agree with the nominator. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT.
206:
541:
PORNBIO was deprecated because, shunned by reliable mainstream sources, porn is all too often left with promotional sources and the porn itself. That is not a good basis for verifiable and balanced articles. The
414:
As in years past, Anna Bell Peaks had great media exposure in 2018. In April she was mentioned in an article in GQ magazine for building her brand and making herself one of the last few true porn stars.
275:
315:
436:
248:
527:
articles both cover a youtube video in which about a dozen different pornographic actresses talk about alternate career paths; both include the same short quote from Ms. Peaks. Cheers,
765:" is a seminal masterpiece and was robbed at the Oscars that year, but the coverage in media outside of AVN and other in-house/in-porn-industry media does not exist for this person.
159:
200:
335:
295:
251:
106:
358:
91:
418:
740:
accounts, and stacked voting. What we need is significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, not porn industry sources that lie all the time.
433:
409:
448:
471:
458:
was created. Even though not mainstream, Peaks has received steady enough significant coverage in reliable sources from porn industry to satisfy
256:
254:
693:, than being a total bureaucrat/wikilawyer. We are talking about a porn actress with more than a dozen award wins, and 1 million followers. —
166:
467:
132:
127:
136:
432:
Other significant coverage, including some shared but still non-trivial coverage (in most of the articles) includes these articles:
355:
119:
86:
79:
17:
221:
442:
246:
188:
671:
sources, claims of satisfying any criterion of WP:ENT cannot be substantiated. Republished press releases don't cut it.
423:
Raven and Chad Alva for Cindy Queen of Hell (BurningAngel). In 2016 she won
Starlet of the Year and Best Model Website.
531:
342:
322:
302:
282:
262:
100:
96:
426:
804:
825:
622:
182:
40:
454:. People from adult industry arent usually covered in mainstream media/coverage. Thats one of the reasons why
808:
791:
774:
753:
721:
702:
696:
680:
655:
649:
626:
601:
595:
572:
536:
498:
492:
483:
477:
390:
370:
347:
327:
307:
287:
267:
178:
61:
800:
528:
339:
319:
299:
279:
259:
123:
451:
821:
690:
36:
228:
787:
637:
618:
115:
67:
746:
551:
214:
428:
770:
668:
510:
717:
676:
568:
455:
401:
386:
366:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
820:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
439:
194:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
546:
articles are clearly marked as press releases (promotional primary sources). Tabloids like
405:
57:
783:
560:
238:
445:
741:
766:
643:
589:
556:
463:
459:
242:
713:
672:
564:
382:
362:
153:
515:
All of those AVN articles are press releases/PR content: note that the urls are
53:
250:; news coverage of her appearance at a South African pornography expo
799:
Per above arguements. Fails GNG and other notability guidelines.
816:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
404:
was in effect. With time, Anna Bell Peaks has received steady
276:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
316:
list of
Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
149:
145:
141:
489:
I took back my vote at 17:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC). —
213:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
828:). No further edits should be made to this page.
334:Note: This discussion has been included in the
314:Note: This discussion has been included in the
294:Note: This discussion has been included in the
274:Note: This discussion has been included in the
336:list of California-related deletion discussions
425:On August 7, 2019; she hosted YNOT cam awards
559:and winners lists are too trivial to satisfy
227:
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
763:I Banged My Tattooed Stepsister in the Ass
617:press releases do not lead to passing GNG.
517:https://avn.com/business/press-release/...
333:
313:
296:list of Women-related deletion discussions
293:
273:
258:; and assorted passing mentions. Cheers,
555:count as significant enough the satisfy
354:Note: This debate has been added to the
452:(xbiz listing of the award nominations)
782:As per previously mentioned reasons.--
421:
413:
7:
664:Again, without acknowledgement from
689:yeah, but sometimes we have to use
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
722:21:21, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
703:09:16, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
681:07:44, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
656:07:25, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
627:01:46, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
602:21:03, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
573:18:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
537:17:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
484:17:10, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
391:07:26, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
371:07:19, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
348:06:20, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
328:06:20, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
308:06:20, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
288:06:20, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
268:06:20, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
809:18:22, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
792:13:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
775:21:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
754:06:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
499:17:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
400:I created this article when
62:06:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
845:
818:Please do not modify it.
462:. She also passes #2 of
32:Please do not modify it.
642:and what about #2 from
356:WikiProject Pornography
550:are not reliable, and
253:; some more interviews
80:Articles for deletion
406:significant coverage
588:Thus passing #2 of
619:John Pack Lambert
501:
419:this AVN article:
359:list of deletions
350:
330:
310:
290:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
836:
801:Wikiuser20102011
751:
749:Let's discuss it
701:
654:
641:
600:
534:
518:
514:
497:
488:
482:
410:This AVN article
373:
345:
325:
305:
285:
265:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
844:
843:
839:
838:
837:
835:
834:
833:
832:
826:deletion review
747:
694:
647:
638:Johnpacklambert
635:
593:
532:
516:
508:
490:
475:
353:
343:
323:
303:
283:
263:
174:
165:
130:
116:Anna Bell Peaks
114:
111:
74:
71:
68:Anna Bell Peaks
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
842:
840:
831:
830:
812:
811:
794:
777:
756:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
706:
705:
691:WP:COMMONSENSE
684:
683:
659:
658:
630:
629:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
578:
577:
576:
575:
539:
503:
502:
486:
431:
394:
393:
375:
374:
351:
331:
311:
291:
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
841:
829:
827:
823:
819:
814:
813:
810:
806:
802:
798:
795:
793:
789:
785:
781:
778:
776:
772:
768:
764:
760:
757:
755:
752:
750:
745:
744:
738:
735:
734:
723:
719:
715:
710:
709:
708:
707:
704:
700:
699:
695:usernamekiran
692:
688:
687:
686:
685:
682:
678:
674:
670:
667:
663:
662:
661:
660:
657:
653:
652:
648:usernamekiran
645:
639:
634:
633:
632:
631:
628:
624:
620:
616:
613:
612:
603:
599:
598:
594:usernamekiran
591:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
553:
549:
545:
540:
538:
535:
530:
526:
522:
512:
511:Usernamekiran
507:
506:
505:
504:
500:
496:
495:
491:usernamekiran
487:
485:
481:
480:
476:usernamekiran
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
446:
443:
440:
437:
434:
429:
427:
424:
420:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
396:
395:
392:
388:
384:
380:
377:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
357:
352:
349:
346:
341:
337:
332:
329:
326:
321:
317:
312:
309:
306:
301:
297:
292:
289:
286:
281:
277:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
261:
257:
255:
252:
249:
247:
244:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
817:
815:
796:
779:
762:
758:
748:
742:
736:
697:
665:
650:
614:
596:
552:WP:DAILYMAIL
547:
543:
524:
520:
493:
478:
397:
378:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
669:WP:RELIABLE
666:independent
201:free images
784:NL19931993
521:Daily Mail
456:WP:PORNBIO
402:WP:PORNBIO
822:talk page
714:• Gene93k
673:• Gene93k
565:• Gene93k
383:• Gene93k
363:• Gene93k
37:talk page
824:or in a
767:Zaathras
561:WP:BASIC
239:WP:BASIC
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
548:The Sun
412:states
207:WPÂ refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
797:Delete
780:Delete
759:Delete
743:Cullen
737:Delete
698:(talk)
651:(talk)
644:WP:ENT
615:Delete
597:(talk)
590:WP:ENT
557:WP:ENT
494:(talk)
479:(talk)
470:, and
464:WP:ENT
460:WP:GNG
450:, and
379:Delete
243:WP:ENT
237:Fails
179:Google
137:delete
54:RL0919
50:delete
472:this.
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
805:talk
788:talk
771:talk
718:talk
677:talk
623:talk
569:talk
523:and
468:this
466:per
398:keep
387:talk
367:talk
241:and
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
646:? —
592:. —
544:AVN
529:gnu
525:Sun
340:gnu
320:gnu
300:gnu
280:gnu
260:gnu
229:TWL
158:– (
807:)
790:)
773:)
720:)
679:)
625:)
571:)
533:57
447:,
444:,
441:,
438:,
435:,
408:.
389:)
369:)
361:.
344:57
338:.
324:57
318:.
304:57
298:.
284:57
278:.
264:57
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
803:(
786:(
769:(
761:"
716:(
675:(
640::
636:@
621:(
567:(
513::
509:@
474:—
430:.
385:(
365:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.