Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Acela circuit - Knowledge

Source 📝

238:
2) That the seven justices had to serve "somewhere" is meaningless. The point, and the reason the term has come to be used, is the proximity of the circuits and states that the "Acela circuit" represents - seven small states (and one district) out of 51 that represent 4 circuits out of 12 are the
340:. There doesn't seem to be anything in this article that isn't already taken care of elsewhere. If the "Acela circuit" designation ever comes to be signficant beyond this particular bit of trivia, it might merit its own article. As of now, that does not seem to be the case at all. 153: 285:
And only a few of those appeals courts at that: seven of the justices served on what might be called the court of appeals for the Acela circuit, in Boston, Philadelphia and Washington.
114: 147: 321:. Neologism. As best as I can tell, it was made up by a New York Times writer. We can't have an article on every witticism emanating from that newspaper. -- 287:
That hardly qualifies as "suggesting it was in the vernacular" or "come into parlance". It looks like they made it up. If it were common (and thus
205:; though seven of nine have apparently served in this group of courts, it does not appear to be a notable term. They more or less all had to serve 87: 82: 242:
The point is that almost all the justices come from a small corner of the U.S., and that is why the term has come into parlance.
91: 17: 74: 168: 135: 364: 36: 363:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
129: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
247: 349: 330: 311: 270: 251: 229: 192: 125: 56: 78: 326: 266: 175: 341: 345: 202: 161: 70: 62: 243: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
141: 322: 304: 262: 222: 184:
Passing mention in a single reputable source is insufficient demonstration of notability.
235:
1) The term was used in the New York Times in a way suggesting it was in the vernacular.
210: 49: 108: 288: 186: 298: 216: 261:
There are just 177 ghits, and all appear to be a loop from the Times.--
357:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
104: 100: 96: 160: 291:), they would have used a different construct than 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 367:). No further edits should be made to this page. 174: 8: 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 239:source of all but 2 justices. 1: 57:00:03, 10 October 2009 (UTC) 350:06:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 331:23:42, 4 October 2009 (UTC) 312:12:55, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 271:23:44, 4 October 2009 (UTC) 252:06:08, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 230:02:11, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 193:01:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 384: 360:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 283:reference reads thus: 213:notwithstanding). 44:The result was 310: 228: 375: 362: 309: 307: 301: 296: 227: 225: 219: 214: 191: 189: 179: 178: 164: 112: 94: 54: 34: 383: 382: 378: 377: 376: 374: 373: 372: 371: 365:deletion review 358: 305: 299: 297: 293:might be called 223: 217: 215: 187: 185: 121: 85: 69: 66: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 381: 379: 370: 369: 353: 352: 334: 333: 315: 314: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 233: 232: 182: 181: 118: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 380: 368: 366: 361: 355: 354: 351: 347: 343: 339: 336: 335: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319:Strong delete 317: 316: 313: 308: 302: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 272: 268: 264: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 249: 245: 244:Cranialsodomy 240: 236: 231: 226: 220: 212: 211:Harriet Miers 208: 204: 201:the apparent 200: 197: 196: 195: 194: 190: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 119: 116: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71:Acela circuit 68: 67: 64: 63:Acela circuit 61: 59: 58: 55: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 359: 356: 337: 318: 292: 284: 280: 241: 237: 234: 206: 203:WP:NEOLOGISM 198: 183: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 51: 45: 43: 31: 28: 148:free images 323:JohnnyB256 263:JohnnyB256 342:Brettalan 207:somewhere 115:View log 289:notable 154:WP refs 142:scholar 88:protect 83:history 52:JForget 338:Delete 300:Frank 218:Frank 199:Delete 188:Durova 126:Google 92:delete 46:delete 306:talk 281:Times 224:talk 169:JSTOR 130:books 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 346:talk 327:talk 279:The 267:talk 248:talk 162:FENS 136:news 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 176:TWL 113:– ( 348:) 329:) 303:| 295:. 269:) 250:) 221:| 156:) 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 48:. 344:( 325:( 265:( 246:( 209:( 180:) 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 120:( 117:) 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
JForget
00:03, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Acela circuit
Acela circuit
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Durova
01:58, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
WP:NEOLOGISM
Harriet Miers
 Frank 

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.