Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Akop Sanasaryan - Knowledge

Source 📝

244:
operator in America is considered "notable" yet an Armenian chemist isn't because the article was a stub?? I'd have appreciated the nominator personally asking me to expand it before going through this process - as always what is "notable" is often POV. Sanasaryan is also chairman of the Green Union of Armenia which I believe is a noted Armenian environmental group. Secondly I don't create articles if I don't believe they have an element of benefit for the encyclopedia and could quite reasonably be developed into articles. PLease don't give me a what wikipedia is and WP:Not and all that -I'm far from a beginner!!.
209:, I think. An environmental campaigner from Armenia who I suspect from a quick perusal of the google hits is reasonably well known in that field. Note that his name is also spelt 'Hakob Sanasaryan' (probably something to do with the transliteration) and that this returns a further 200 hits on google. There's even a press picture of him here 243:
I stubbed this a while back and had forgotten about it. Akop Sanasaryan is a major environmentalist and chemist in Armenia who has been an active player in nuclear politics in the country. One thing I dislkie about wikipedia is uneven coverage -that some small time university professor or blog
160:
The article has been a stub for almost a year, google gives 87 hits, google scholar gives no hits and one quotation in a magazine surely does not establish notability.
110: 127:
The page has had a significant update and a name change to the correct spelling after I had placed the AfD. I would now like to withdraw my nomination.
262:
If New Scientist says he's notable, other sources do as well -- even if we haven't found them yet. More sourcing is in order, not deletion.
146: 83: 78: 87: 70: 17: 149:, but none are personal. On a related note, could you expand your rationales for deletion - they're a little terse? -- 210: 281: 36: 280:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
245: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
266: 254: 235: 216: 201: 189: 164: 153: 131: 121: 52: 74: 161: 128: 118: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
213: 198: 66: 58: 231: 185: 263: 226: 142: 104: 49: 150: 178:, so i would assume that if they noticed his campaign, that others have also. 180: 274:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
141:- he seems borderline non-notable; there are some mentions in 100: 96: 92: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 284:). No further edits should be made to this page. 46:keep; nomination withdrawn; non-admin closure 8: 7: 224:Stands borderline in notability. -- 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 301: 267:09:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 255:09:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 236:07:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 217:04:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 202:03:57, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 190:00:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 165:02:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 154:23:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 132:10:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 122:23:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 53:11:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 277:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 174:that article is from 197:, he is notable. 292: 279: 252: 234: 229: 143:reliable sources 108: 90: 34: 300: 299: 295: 294: 293: 291: 290: 289: 288: 282:deletion review 275: 249:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 246: 227: 225: 81: 67:Akop Sanasaryan 65: 62: 59:Akop Sanasaryan 50:John Vandenberg 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 298: 296: 287: 286: 270: 269: 257: 238: 219: 204: 192: 168: 167: 157: 156: 135: 134: 115: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 297: 285: 283: 278: 272: 271: 268: 265: 261: 258: 256: 253: 251: 250: 242: 239: 237: 233: 230: 223: 220: 218: 215: 211: 208: 205: 203: 200: 196: 193: 191: 187: 183: 182: 177: 176:New Scientist 173: 170: 169: 166: 163: 162:Alan Liefting 159: 158: 155: 152: 148: 144: 140: 137: 136: 133: 130: 129:Alan Liefting 126: 125: 124: 123: 120: 119:Alan Liefting 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 276: 273: 259: 248: 247: 240: 221: 206: 194: 179: 175: 171: 138: 117:Non-notable 116: 45: 43: 31: 28: 139:Weak Delete 214:Malcolmxl5 199:Callelinea 222:Weak Keep 172:Weak keep 111:View log 264:Spazure 232:iva1979 145:, like 84:protect 79:history 88:delete 151:Haemo 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 260:Keep 241:Keep 207:Keep 195:Keep 186:talk 147:this 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 181:DGG 109:– ( 212:-- 188:) 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 228:S 184:( 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
John Vandenberg
11:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Akop Sanasaryan
Akop Sanasaryan
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Alan Liefting
23:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Alan Liefting
10:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
reliable sources
this
Haemo
23:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Alan Liefting
02:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
DGG
talk
00:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Callelinea

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.