363:
Regarding point SK#2c, there was not a single delete !vote at the last AfD. Regarding SK#2b and SK#2d, this forum is for worthless articles, not a place to resolve content disputes. Regarding SK#2d, there has been a sequence of reverts since the last AfD by editors for and against redirecting the article. Note that the last AfD was closed to allow discussion to proceed on the talk page, and there is not a single comment on the talk page.
425:
target, or any other discussion that I can find. I disagree with
Unscintillating, in that the AFD forum certainly can be used to discuss the possibility of a merge, but it should not be the first step to that end. As noted at the last AFD, discussion needs to take place at the article's talk page, which it hasn't. That discussion comes first. The nominator also highlights the previous close as incorrect; if that's the case,
424:
on the merits, though there are valid arguments for a merge. Unfortunately, the nominator appears to have attempted to edit-war the article into a redirect, which does nothing to prove his point. The nominator also has made no edits on this topic to the talk pages of this article, the proposed merge
469:
Actually, I'd be more trigger-happy with those two examples. The only reference either of those articles has is a mention in Lonely Planet - the rest is reprints of their own websites. Writing about barely notable entities on the few things that have been covered in reliable sources is fine, but
362:
SK#2b disruption (I'll explain), SK#2c, "c making nominations of the same article with the same arguments immediately after they were strongly rejected in a recently closed deletion discussion", and SK#2d, "d nominations that are clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion".
380:
but consider merging all articles of micronations in the UK (or Europe?) into one article. Much as I wish we'd take no notice of these deluded attention-seekers, the fact remains these silly things got attention in the mainstream media. However, these individual articles are an invitation for
245:, based on comments from regular contributors), but constantly reverted by accounts with few edits outside this topic. Majority of the references are to primary sources or user-submitted sites - little significant coverage from independent sources. Google news search on
206:
112:
107:
102:
97:
92:
87:
246:
337:
167:
470:
dedicating 95% of articles to reprints of people's websites is surely not what
Knowledge's for. There are reasonable arguments to keep this article, but that's a classic
200:
315:
82:
497:. It's made it into several international publications, as demonstrated in the citations - clearly notable enough to meet the inclusion criteria.
249:
shows no results. Standard search shows mainly unreliable sources, wikis, and primary sources - again, no significant coverage found.
435:
299:
281:
It doesn't matter how notable the sources are or by whom they were published if they don't establish that
Austenasia meets the
17:
140:
135:
529:
506:
483:
464:
439:
412:
390:
372:
351:
329:
306:
276:
258:
65:
479:
386:
144:
221:
493:. This article has a greater number and a wider range of reliable sources than other articles on micronations, such as
188:
127:
53:
272:
525:
548:
494:
408:
368:
40:
502:
475:
382:
515:
182:
460:
254:
544:
268:
267:- The sources are notable. Also, I don't find any evidence that any of the sources were self-published.
61:
36:
178:
471:
452:
404:
400:
364:
294:
238:
498:
448:
214:
228:
456:
430:
347:
325:
250:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
543:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
57:
381:
puffery. I'd rather we didn't use
Knowledge to feed self-importance when we can avoid it.
289:
131:
194:
426:
282:
447:. I don't see how this meets the inclusion criteria any more or less than, say, the
343:
321:
161:
123:
71:
241:(Prior AfD was mistakenly closed as no consensus, when it should have been
537:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
514:
Enough coverage in multiple reliable sources to pass GNG
157:
153:
149:
213:
399:
As per my redirect !vote less than three months ago,
237:
Unremarkable micronation. Have tried redirecting to
338:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
113:Articles for deletion/Austenasia (7th nomination)
108:Articles for deletion/Austenasia (6th nomination)
103:Articles for deletion/Austenasia (5th nomination)
98:Articles for deletion/Austenasia (4th nomination)
93:Articles for deletion/Austenasia (3rd nomination)
88:Articles for deletion/Austenasia (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
551:). No further edits should be made to this page.
227:
8:
336:Note: This debate has been included in the
316:list of England-related deletion discussions
314:Note: This debate has been included in the
335:
313:
80:
7:
78:
24:
83:Articles for deletion/Austenasia
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
530:12:42, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
507:17:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
484:17:44, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
465:17:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
440:15:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
413:04:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
391:09:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
373:00:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
352:18:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
330:18:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
307:00:44, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
277:20:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
259:16:17, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
66:18:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
403:already covers the topic.
568:
495:Russian Empire (Suwarrow)
540:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:AfDs for this article:
453:Republic of Molossia
401:List of micronations
239:List of micronations
476:Chris Neville-Smith
461:Hailing Frequencies
449:Empire of Atlantium
383:Chris Neville-Smith
283:inclusion criteria
445:Keep, don't merge
438:
354:
341:
332:
319:
54:non-admin closure
559:
542:
522:
519:
434:
342:
320:
305:
302:
297:
292:
269:InTheRevolution2
232:
231:
217:
165:
147:
48:The result was
34:
567:
566:
562:
561:
560:
558:
557:
556:
555:
549:deletion review
538:
520:
517:
427:Deletion review
405:Unscintillating
365:Unscintillating
300:
295:
290:
286:
174:
138:
122:
119:
117:
75:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
565:
563:
554:
553:
533:
532:
509:
499:Qwertyuiop1994
488:
487:
486:
442:
418:
417:
416:
415:
394:
393:
375:
356:
355:
333:
311:
310:
309:
235:
234:
171:
118:
116:
115:
110:
105:
100:
95:
90:
85:
79:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
564:
552:
550:
546:
541:
535:
534:
531:
528:
527:
524:
523:
513:
510:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
472:WP:OTHERSTUFF
468:
467:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:
441:
437:
432:
429:is that way.
428:
423:
420:
419:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
397:
396:
395:
392:
388:
384:
379:
376:
374:
370:
366:
361:
358:
357:
353:
349:
345:
339:
334:
331:
327:
323:
317:
312:
308:
304:
303:
298:
293:
284:
280:
279:
278:
274:
270:
266:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
169:
163:
159:
155:
151:
146:
142:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
120:
114:
111:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
539:
536:
526:
516:
511:
490:
457:Newbiepedian
444:
431:UltraExactZZ
421:
377:
359:
287:
264:
251:MikeWazowski
247:"Austenasia"
242:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
49:
47:
31:
28:
360:Speedy keep
201:free images
58:Mark Arsten
124:Austenasia
72:Austenasia
545:talk page
521:Explosion
518:Supernova
344:• Gene93k
322:• Gene93k
37:talk page
547:or in a
168:View log
39:or in a
451:or the
207:WP refs
195:scholar
141:protect
136:history
179:Google
145:delete
296:COMMS
291:ƒETCH
243:merge
222:JSTOR
183:books
162:views
154:watch
150:links
16:<
512:Keep
503:talk
491:Keep
480:talk
422:Keep
409:talk
387:talk
378:Keep
369:talk
348:talk
326:talk
273:talk
265:Keep
255:talk
215:FENS
189:news
158:logs
132:talk
128:edit
62:talk
50:Keep
455:.--
436:Did
229:TWL
166:– (
52:. (
505:)
482:)
474:.
463:)
411:)
389:)
371:)
350:)
340:.
328:)
318:.
285:.
275:)
257:)
209:)
160:|
156:|
152:|
148:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
64:)
56:)
501:(
478:(
459:(
433:~
407:(
385:(
367:(
346:(
324:(
301:/
288:/
271:(
253:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
164:)
126:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.