1655:) There is no concrete evidence of Bosnian Mujahideen(s). Just because of one or two books that were written with clear bias we cannot write an article on Knowledge . This was why an article concerning the Muslim causalities at Jasenovac was deleted a few months ago, since there were only a couple of books on the issue. There needs to be historical research backed by various sides in order for someone to write about this issue on Knowledge. Knowledge is not a blog nor is a 'web site' designed to formulate new ideas or concepts. We had disputes about this new formation of concepts concerning "
921:, I don't really understand your reasoning here. Just because there are video game players calling themselves "Bosnian Mujahideen" (wherever did they get that idea from, one can always ask, though) has no bearing on the academic use of the term - as exemplified by the Kohlmann article. Just because there is a lot of 'noise' on the internet when you search for the term on Google doesn't mean it's not a valid term that is also used in an academic environment. I agree that there are many other terms for the "Bosnian Mujahideen", though I believe this one is the best.
1671:(International Crimes court sees it as genocide) was not genocide. The international community sees it as genocide. Plus, he mentioned about the role of BiH in supporting Islamic terrorism, etc. He is a completely biased person who was prevented from hosting the 11th Congress of Eu Police with reason. The European Union does not view Bosnia as a place of Islamic Terrorism. Therefore (having said all of this), this article is based on complete bias and not enough historical evidence to prove such a great existence of Bosnian Mujahideen fighters. Thank you,
645:, and the profile states that "His journalism has been widely published on both sides of the Atlantic, including in the Spectator, the New Statesman, the Guardian, the Catholic Herald, the American Prospect, Reason, Slate and Salon magazines, and the Christian Science Monitor. He also writes regular reports for BBC News Online and is British correspondent for the Polish political weekly Prze Kroj." Which should give you some idea why the Guardian commentisfree site commission articles from him. --
1921:: Contrary to what has been claimed, the expression "Bosnian mujahideen" is not used colloquially, as is demonstrated by the many negative Google searches, and so at best it's an ORish neologism. Also, it's blatantly wrong, as the people concerned were mostly foreign fighters, so they were obviously NOT Bosnian. If someone wants to write an article on this subject, they should write it under "El Mujahid". The current article is badly written, badly formatted, and clearly non-neutral. --
153:
1667:" articles. Besides Darko Trifunovic, a Serb, who is a terrorism expert claimed/supported this issue and other similar made up issues. He was supposed to be the host of the "11th Congress of European Police" but his invitation was revoked due to uprise against him. The only reason many Bosniaks and others rose up against him is since they knew he was wrong for claiming that the
1124:
What about the post war issues (which to date have not ended) when the foreign volunteers were no longer in military units but their presence in Bosnia is still considered to be a political problem (In the way that those who volunteered to fight for the
Bosnian Serbs or the Bosnian Croats do not seem
1037:
So, what is revelant here? (a) "you say so, and almost EVERY SINGLE BOOK AND ARTICLE is wrong"? (b) you think one guy used it, when he really didn't"? (I explained you few times already, and I'll do it again: the phrase used by this single person was "Afghan-Bosnian mujahideen network/Afghan-Bosnian
1313:
And now I looked onto 7th Muslim
Brigade talk page and the Bosnian Internet War goes on there, too. But, it's not my problem and actually I don't know enough on this subject. I'm only here because Osli was linking his BM as a "main article" everywhere he could, sparking negative reactions from some
1732:
This term simply isn't used. It appears very sporadically, even on the internet, and has been shown to be an inherently POV characterization. The subject that it's supposed to cover is addressed in numerous other articles that have been mentioned here; there is no reason why the supporters of this
1801:
Unfortunately, certain
Bosnian trolls have deleted a lot of material from mainstream sources in these articles, replacing it with UN.Org whitewashes - hence the creation of this article. I was blocked by Knowledge for restoring this material, and right now this is the best article on the subject.
610:
Nice guys, these "revolutionary communists".) I have no idea why The
Guardian allows him to even blog on their website. (Ah, and "O'Neill has ridiculed those who wish to take action to reduce carbon emissions in order to tackle global warming." He's a real expert on everything!)
786:
Osli73, there is no need for such misrepresentation of sources. The title you cite: "The Afghan-Bosnian
Mujahideen Network in Europe" by Evan F. Kohlmann war just a research/working title (and it is about the network), he changed it when published his book into a subtitle
1976:(/added) The current title is a non-notable neologism. Any useful information can be moved to other articles. If those articles become too long, proper daughter articles may be created. (added) A summary of the non-official military forces should be merged into
1011:, as I've stated before. Google searches and Bosnian video gamers isn't a relevant here. What is relevant is that (a) there certainly were Bosnian mujahideen and (b) the term is used by Kohlmann. However, I can agree on changing from Mujahideen to mujahideen.
629:
place their editorials and opinion pieces on this site and invite comment on them. They also place other articles by journalists on this site. The site has an editorial overview including and editor for commissions which the piece by
Brendan O’Neill is, (see
1474:
name for Jedi who are very popular in
Bosnian cinemas...Come on guys...isn't it enough, all this special war by Serb/Croat nationalists in Knowledge...I didn't mean to be rude, but I had to say this...Btw there are several articles covering this subject
745:
and the matter presented in as NPOV as possible. Note that I have been involved as an editor in this article. However, I would have nothing against changing the title from "Bosnian
Mujahideen" (capital "M") to "Bosnian mujahideen" (small "m").
369:
Notice that I suggest that the article name is moved to
Bosnian mujahideen so that it is a descriptive title. The BBC says mujahideen in Bosnia which is the same as saying "Bosnain mujahideen" as an example of similar use see "British Gurkhas"
894:
This how "often used" this term is. Ergo, "Bosnian
Mujahideen" article should be about a videogame clan from Bosnia and a video clip on Youtube clones (the latter one being the vast majority of all "Bosnian Mujahideen" hits, that is
883:), and again these videogamers. In these top 20 hits, there is only one actual article (Reuters), which (besides the title, which identified the country, not a supposed group) only mentioned "former Islamic Mujahideen fighters", "
456:(yes, exactly because they "are not British"). Now you understand, on your own example? Also, I did not nominate it (or even suggested it). The persosn who did didn't came here for some reason. (I guess I'll tell them now.) --
470:
No I don't understand your position. Just because Knowledge does not have an article entitled "British Gurhkas" does not mean that the expression is not used and is a shorthand for Gurkhas who are or have served the British
860:(which was apparently the actual name of the unit) was made only a redirect by Osli to the supposed Bosnian Mujahideen group (who claims his term is "often used", while it's not - see my searches). Claear enough now? --
2262:
Have you looked at previous discussion? Nobody's denying that some of the material in this article could be used elsewhere, but it has an inherently POV title and its contents are already discussed elsewhere.
304:
This is regarding "Bosnian Mujahideen" (sounds like some organization, capital letters and all), not "mujahideen in Bosnia" (covered in several articles). Also why do you think "mujahideen" is "POV-loaded"?
943:
wrote about "Afghan-Bosnian mujahideen network", not about a group called "Bosnian Mujahideen" (see the confirmation in his final book). So, my proposition after I searched google for books and websites:
879:- 4 out of 10 first hits are about a team of Sarajevo videogame players, while the rest is mostly video sharing websites - plus a blog entry. The next page is the same, still mostly about a clip (titled
1629:
While bin Ladenite propagandists, as well as Western journalists, have expended a vast quantity of ink on the topic of the Bosnian "mujahideen," in reality they played almost no perceptible role in the
2351:
Disagree. This article is specifically about radical Islamist activity in Bosnia, and should not be diluted into other articles. This is a notable issue which deserves a Knowledge article. Rename to
768:- no "Bosnian mujahideen" whatsoever. I just showed you there are only 7 books mentioning this phrase (out of several hundred books more or less on the issue), and not in the titles but AT ALL. --
2174:
In that case, could you please explain: 1.) What exactly is radical Islam? 2.) Where is it found in the Balkans? 3.) Why such information doesn't belong in previously existing articles? Thanks.
840:). "Bosnian Mujahideen" article is a sole separate one. I don't comment on its content, because frankly I didn't read it (it looks badly written, though). But I don't think it's needed. So,
1516:
And even if the Srebrenica massacre did happen, it doesn't erase the fact that Izetbegovic was an Islamic fundamentalist whose views were at odds with Western democratic principles. --
2122:
Yes, and you and your friend "The Dragon of Bosnia" have repeatedly whitewashed that article, deleting material from mainstream sources. That is why this one had to be created. --
2138:
Jehochman, I wonder if it could be anything shorter but if thats ok with people, I'm ok too. In any case, any kind of rename would work out better than what we have right now. --
1783:. However, having this article would be O'K if it did not duplicate content of other articles. So, it would be more reasonable to work with content, as to minimize the overlap.
418:
are not British. Your argument about the content of the article should be on the talk page of the article, rather than here which is to discuss if the page should be deleted. --
812:
as per Osli73. Mujahideen do operate in Bosnia, and I have seen a report on NTV Hayat about a document which clearly states that there are mujahideen operating in Bosnia. --
288:- no vote in this. The term is hardly new. Variations of the term (e.g. "Mujahideenis") were used during the 1992-1996 war. It's not a neologism, but a POV-loaded label.
603:, until it was forced to close following a libel action brought by ITN." The libel case was, incidentally, regarding Serbian crimes in Bosnia. (And LM also denied the
2165:
Sounds better and applies more broadly than what I was going to suggest "Islamic extremists in the Balkans". I like the term radical Islam. Its short and accurate. --
1582:
2227:
as this is a clearly notable (and highly encyclopediac) topic. It is clearly a pretty well sourced article. POV problems here can easily be fixed without deletion.
2105:
1776:
1480:
1167:
987:
845:
262:
200:
762:
You don't understand. It's more like "Afghan-Bosnian...Network" (of mujahideen), not "(Afghan-)Bosnian Mujahideen". Geez, even book you linked is actually called
1585:
2244:, what, exactly, are the POV issues you refer to? I have tried to portray this topic in a serious and NPOV manner, basing the statements on good sources.
1435:
related issue." But congratulations on discovering I was reffering to you in the comment directed to you. At least you eventually understood this. --
596:
688:
Living Marxism has learnt the hard way that it cannot throw stones through windows and be able to run giggling down the street without being chased
1052:
Would you also object to the title "Mujahideen in Bosnia" which in Google search returns 'about 2,810 for "Mujahideen in Bosnia"' one of which is
1466:
during one of his edit wars. It is not the first time he was banned, but hey this is just ridiculous. He somehow decided to make balance between
400:
is not true. It's used very rarely - almost never. El-Mujahid, on the other way, apparently was an actual name of the foreign volunteer unit. --
392:
No, not the same. They were not Bosnian mujahideen, like there were Afghan mujahideen in the case of Afghanistan. They were foreign mujahideen.
88:
83:
896:
1802:
Bosnia is now regarded as a major base for radical Islamists in Europe. Deleting this article would be tantamount to a political cover-up. --
887:
Mujahideen" (twice, bald mine), "MUJAHIDEEN", and "the Mujahideen" also twice (as well as simply "ex-fighters", "former fighters", and just "
249:
92:
2331:
1977:
1708:
1624:
1604:
877:
738:
1212:
Oh, I looked into the issue. Actually, the small before-Osli article was redirected into the parent unit article by the original author.
75:
1707:
Another test. As another user (unintentionally) showed, Google News Archives search also shows that there is only 1 hit on this phrase
595:" :eyesroll: Yeah, a real expert. Oh, and what else? "He began his career in journalism at Spiked's predecessor, the journal of the
2327:
2092:
1981:
529:, which is AN ACTUAL NAME OF ORGANISATION, too. Not someone's own invention, which is then falsely claimed to be "often" used.) --
1711:
1607:
245:
17:
1470:
with a few Arab frustrating fighters who came to help after they saw genocide on TV. OK, tommorow maybe I am going to made up
241:
1850:
1130:
1065:
796:
650:
575:
482:
423:
375:
337:
2104:
Terrorism is not the same term as foreign volunteers (a volunteer isn't a terrorist by default), this subject is covered in
558:
224:
1592:
856:, whatever (I noticed there's much stuff about indicted persons, why not make their own articles?). Oh, I just noticed
1060:. Personally I think that "Bosnian mujahideen" is more elegant, but I could understand if you thought it confusing. --
514:
788:
726:
1099:
2352:
2148:
1419:. Related to that concern, some editors expressed the connected belief that the article is inherently contrary to
237:
122:. Related to that concern, some editors expressed the connected belief that the article is inherently contrary to
2385:
2071:
1846:
1689:
I don't think anyone here mentioned Darko Trifunovic in any way. The plural of mujahid is actually mujahideen. --
1126:
1061:
792:
646:
478:
419:
371:
333:
118:
I am nominating this article as a neutral party. Concerns have been expressed that the title of the article is a
36:
2368:
2342:
2314:
2293:
2272:
2253:
2205:
2183:
2169:
2160:
2142:
2131:
2117:
2099:
2082:
2054:
2040:
2022:
1988:
1960:
1930:
1913:
1875:
1854:
1811:
1792:
1761:
1742:
1722:
1698:
1680:
1641:
1618:
1596:
1565:
1539:
1525:
1496:
1444:
1410:
1393:
1374:
1358:
1323:
1280:
1234:
1179:
1134:
1119:
1069:
1047:
1020:
1003:
930:
911:
869:
821:
800:
777:
755:
707:
654:
620:
579:
538:
508:
486:
465:
427:
409:
379:
364:
347:
314:
297:
278:
215:
183:
143:
57:
2384:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1887:
article is well referenced and all info in other articles should be merged into this. Also, I suggest the name
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1733:
one can't simply redirect their efforts there, instead of causing needless dispute over a controversial name.
495:: "To simply say 'Other Stuff Exists' as one's sole rationale for creation, retention, or deletion (using an '
231:(most of these used "mujahideen" not "Mujahideen", btw - there was no organization called Bosnian Mujahideen).
2113:
2036:
1588:
1492:
79:
641:
makes it clear that he is left wing, but one would expect that for people who contribute opinion pieces to
1738:
1718:
1694:
1637:
1614:
1535:
1440:
1370:
1319:
1276:
1230:
1175:
1115:
1043:
999:
959:
907:
865:
773:
703:
616:
534:
461:
405:
360:
310:
274:
211:
2075:
1505:
Actually, it was around 6,000 foreign Islamic fighters in Bosnia, including senior al-Qaeda people. Even
1345:
The Mujahideen undoubtedly did operate in Bosnia, with the support of the West, Russia (yes, Russia, see
398:
used for the Muslim volunteers to fight on the Bosnian government side during the 1992-1995 Bosnian War.
2234:
1926:
526:
1788:
475:
2364:
2338:
2201:
2156:
2127:
2050:
2018:
1956:
1907:
1871:
1807:
1676:
1561:
1521:
1406:
1354:
563:
522:
504:
449:
343:
53:
1660:
892:
722:
588:
1668:
1467:
963:
737:" by terrorism expert Evan F. Kohlmann (published, among other things, in the prestigious journal
567:
1784:
1471:
1314:
other users. I've got interested and it turned out the term was indeed largely invented by him. --
1106:
article before Osli came around with his "often". There's also a an article on their parent unit (
638:
2289:
2268:
2179:
2109:
2032:
1780:
1488:
1484:
1222:
1107:
849:
817:
571:
557:
This article is true, why do people want to delete? Please look at article in today's Guardian.
518:
329:
266:
179:
139:
71:
63:
675:
671:
608:
2192:. Where is it found? I think we have provided enough sources here already, but here's another:
2010:
1997:
You are wrong. It is notable, and has been covered in the mainstream media. As I said earlier,
1514:
828:
I find this is amusing how everyone keep misunderstanding the issue. Oh, did I mention there's
676:
Genocide? What genocide? Serbian atrocities were not the only ones Living Marxism tried to deny
1734:
1714:
1690:
1633:
1610:
1531:
1436:
1366:
1315:
1272:
1226:
1171:
1111:
1039:
995:
990:). (An explaination, because some people don't understand many things: this was an example of
903:
861:
833:
769:
699:
612:
530:
457:
401:
356:
306:
293:
270:
207:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1170:. This is briefly mentioned, but might be expanded (and the article re-written if needed). --
474:
just as Indian Gorkhas is used as a shorthand for Gorkhas who have server in the Indian Army.
2310:
2249:
2229:
1922:
1757:
1389:
1053:
1016:
940:
926:
751:
741:) on Bosnian Mujahideen and their connection with global terrorist networks. The article is
683:
672:
Life after Living Marxism: Fighting for freedom - to offend, outrage and question everything
604:
1271:. No matter the original author of most of the article redirected it elsewhere. Stylish. --
1094:
Yes. Because they had their unit, and it's name was El Mujaid. Like, what is better title,
499:
direction) is neither convincing nor proper, and usually not acceptable in discussions." --
2360:
2334:
2197:
2152:
2123:
2046:
2014:
1952:
1948:
1892:
1867:
1803:
1672:
1557:
1517:
1402:
1350:
687:
679:
635:
500:
167:
49:
1713:(actually up to 4). ENOUGH NOW? If it's still "not a neologism", I don't know what is. --
559:
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/brendan_oneill/2008/01/the_taint_of_association.html
2096:
1985:
1947:
units within the Bosnian army itself. And, yes, they were trained by the Iranians. Dr.
1545:
1506:
1420:
950:
899:
721:
the term is used to describe the mujahideen operating in Bosnia, for example, see the
600:
163:
123:
2193:
1057:
2285:
2264:
2175:
1424:
1416:
813:
591:, and this is what I found: "He currently writing a book about terrorism titled From
492:
325:
175:
171:
135:
127:
119:
1998:
1984:. The content of this article can go in there. This would be best practice NPOV.
1664:
1549:
642:
626:
289:
1038:
network", not "Bosnian mujahideen") Whoah, that's a lot. Don't delete my stuff. --
525:". Amazing, how can it be? You've got to do this ASAP, I guess. (And there's also
109:
1581:. A Google News Archives search shows that there are plenty of sources for this.
631:
2356:
2306:
2245:
2166:
2139:
2079:
1753:
1656:
1463:
1428:
1385:
1346:
1012:
983:
922:
747:
131:
394:
Bosnian Mujahideen (also referred to as El Mujaheed or El Mujahid) is the term
2031:, but we are talking here about Bosnian Mujahideen, this isn't a common name.
2028:
1772:
1476:
1103:
979:
857:
853:
837:
355:
Aaaand where exactly in the article was the term "Bosnian mujahideen" used? --
258:
1951:
covers this issue extensively in his two books on the Bosnian conflict. --
2189:
2006:
1510:
971:
955:
836:" article? There was, but now it's just redirect - to the main article (
991:
453:
742:
415:
1627:
does not contain this phrase in a serious meaning, and istead says
1606:, and 5 (actually 4, because there is the "network" again) not 889.
1487:
etc...another cloned article with an unknown name is hmmm... ?! --
967:
1415:"Concerns have been expressed that the title of the article is a
1401:
People without an argument often resort to ad hominem attacks. --
2378:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1777:
The role of foreign fighters in the Bosnian war#For the Bosniaks
1481:
The role of foreign fighters in the Bosnian war#For the Bosniaks
1384:, what do you mean by this comment and who are you referring to?
1095:
263:
The role of foreign fighters in the Bosnian war#For the Bosniaks
257:
Incidentally, there are several articles covering this subject (
472:
147:
1530:"And even if the Srebrenica massacre did happen". Get out. --
2070:: real simple, rename it to a better title on the lines of
1623:
Oh well, turned out I was wrong - "plenty" is now "null" (
844:. If stuff there is any stuff okay, then integrate with
1980:. A more detailed daughter article should be created,
1399:
1268:
1219:
1216:
1213:
939:
And (mostly) only them. Where they got it... from you?
662:
is liberal, not "revolutionary communist". Here's what
105:
101:
97:
170:. I politely request that participants strike out any
1943:? They clearly did operate in Bosnia, and there were
966:
other players a lot. It is also a title of a popular
1221:
it is now. So, no, the original writers decided the
1215:
Then Osli came around and did this weird-ass thing:
1771:. This looks like a POV fork since we have already
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1839:supported by another user with anti-Muslim agenda.
1398:I just discovered that he/she was referring to me.
1710:(actually 0). Google Scholar comes up with only 5
2388:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2330:" per Jehochman. Per him also, merge parts into
978:). Rarely, it was also used to describe foreign
2106:The role of foreign fighters in the Bosnian war
1584:. Google Scholar comes up with plenty as well.
1548:" and you'll see what I mean. I might add that
1168:The role of foreign fighters in the Bosnian war
988:the role of foreign fighters in the Bosnian war
846:The role of foreign fighters in the Bosnian war
593:Bosnia to Beslan: How the West Spread al-Qaeda.
513:Oh. You know, I checked, and "British Gurkhas"
2305:exactly, what are the POV issues you refer to?
694:veterans to continue their lies... now in the
229:Bosnian Muslim and "Bosnian" mujahideen forces
2328:Paramilitary forces in Bosnia and Herzogovina
2093:Paramilitary forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina
1982:Paramilitary forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina
1752:Please, don't make mockery of Knowledge :( --
1609:The new definition of "plenty" is now "1". --
698:? Oh. Okay, makes a perfect sense I guess. --
201:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
2045:Yes, and we are discussing a name change. --
625:I think you misunderstanding the web site.
2011:The Hidden Army Of Radical Islam in Bosnia
791:(without mentioning Mujahideen). Regards.
976:Bosnian Mujahideen: Yesterday & Today
881:Bosnian Mujahideen: Yesterday & Today
240:(not "Bosnia Mujahideen") returned ~380,
1836:written by a user with a scary block log
199:: This debate has been included in the
158:This is a somewhat controversial topic.
1269:keeps stealing this article for himself
1603:The actual number of hits is 1 not 738
587:It's a blog, isn't it? I just checked
491:HanzoHattori's "argument" falls under
1866:are two entirely different things. --
1056:and another the previously mentioned
7:
2332:Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
2284:This is a completely POV neologism.
1978:Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
1889:Mujahideen in Bosnia and Herzegovina
328:, but perhaps is should be moved to
1218:. This was fixed later in this way:
227:returned only 7 hits (1 doubled) +
134:as such is another related issue.
24:
2095:, per my modified comment above?
2027:So what? There is article called
1773:Mujahideen#Bosnia and Herzegovina
1477:Mujahideen#Bosnia and Herzegovina
259:Mujahideen#Bosnia and Herzegovina
2194:Wahhabism: From Vienna to Bosnia
151:
1552:mentions the word 'mujahideen'
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1427:. Whether or not the topic is
1225:is enough and now I agree. --
515:actually is used in literature
130:. Whether or not the topic is
1:
2240:06:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
1100:Paramilitary police in Russia
680:Poison in the well of history
597:Revolutionary Communist Party
269:as of these I'm aware of). --
2369:23:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
2353:Radical Islam in the Balkans
2343:23:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
2315:22:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
2294:21:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
2273:21:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
2254:22:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
2206:22:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
2184:21:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
2170:21:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
2161:00:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
2149:Radical Islam in the Balkans
2143:23:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
2132:00:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
2118:23:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
2100:22:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
2083:22:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
2055:00:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
2041:23:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
2023:18:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
1989:22:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
1961:18:28, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
1931:18:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
1914:16:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
1876:17:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
1855:15:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
1812:19:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1793:19:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1762:17:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1743:16:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1723:09:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1699:10:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1681:04:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1642:09:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1619:09:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1597:09:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
1566:17:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1540:08:39, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1526:23:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
1497:22:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
1445:08:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1411:16:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
1394:08:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
1375:04:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
1359:01:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
1349:), Iran and Saudi Arabia. --
1324:22:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
1281:10:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1235:21:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
1180:08:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
1135:09:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
1120:21:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
1070:21:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
1048:20:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
1021:20:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
1004:16:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
962:. They are often accused of
931:13:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
912:11:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
870:03:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
822:22:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
801:15:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
789:"The Afghan-Bosnian Network"
778:03:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
756:21:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
743:based on reliable references
708:16:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
655:14:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
621:04:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
580:18:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
539:08:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
509:19:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
487:18:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
466:20:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
428:17:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
410:16:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
380:13:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
365:03:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
348:18:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
315:03:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
298:17:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
279:17:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
216:08:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
184:09:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
144:16:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
58:00:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
2072:Islamic terrorism in Bosnia
246:"foreign volunteers" bosnia
2405:
1939:So why not just rename it
1556:in his Sky News report. --
898:- with only 438 about the
876:OK, I did another search:
765:The Afghan-Bosnian Network
497:other stuff doesn't exist'
250:"muslim volunteers" bosnia
1462:This term is made up by @
242:"foreign fighters" bosnia
2381:Please do not modify it.
517:. But no-one redirected
223:I checked Google Books.
32:Please do not modify it.
634:for more details). The
2188:For the ideology, see
1862:Being anti-Muslim and
1625:the only article found
982:who fought during the
960:Bosnia and Herzegovina
172:inappropriate comments
1509:'s pro-establishment
527:British Gurkhas Nepal
1941:Mujahideen in Bosnia
1847:The Dragon of Bosnia
1127:Philip Baird Shearer
1062:Philip Baird Shearer
793:The Dragon of Bosnia
647:Philip Baird Shearer
479:Philip Baird Shearer
420:Philip Baird Shearer
372:Philip Baird Shearer
334:Philip Baird Shearer
225:"Bosnian Mujahideen"
2076:Terrorism in Bosnia
2005:eight times in his
1669:Srebrenica Massacre
1468:Srebrenica massacre
686:- and then, after "
46:KEEP (no consensus)
1781:7th Muslim Brigade
1589:Capitalistroadster
1485:7th Muslim Brigade
1223:7th Muslim Brigade
1108:7th Muslim Brigade
946:Bosnian Mujahideen
850:7th Muslim Brigade
733:Bosnian Mujahideen
639:profile of O’Neill
519:Brigade of Gurkhas
330:Bosnian mujahideen
267:7th Muslim Brigade
72:Bosnian Mujahideen
64:Bosnian Mujahideen
2355:, per myself and
1779:, and especially
1425:original research
902:players etc.) --
834:Afghan mujahideen
735:Network in Europe
582:
566:comment added by
350:
248:returned 42, and
238:Bosnia Mujahideen
218:
204:
189:
188:
128:original research
2396:
2383:
2237:
2232:
1904:
1898:
1423:and unavoidably
1054:a Reuters report
941:Evan F. Kohlmann
729:with the title "
678:; calling themj
605:Rwandan Genocide
561:
341:
326:this BBC article
205:
195:
155:
154:
148:
126:and unavoidably
113:
95:
34:
2404:
2403:
2399:
2398:
2397:
2395:
2394:
2393:
2392:
2386:deletion review
2379:
2235:
2230:
1949:Yossef Bodansky
1899:
1893:
739:Foreign Affairs
636:Guardian Online
632:Comment is free
523:British Gurkhas
450:British Gurkhas
152:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2402:
2400:
2391:
2390:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2371:
2346:
2345:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2297:
2296:
2278:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2257:
2256:
2221:
2220:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2086:
2085:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2001:used the term
1992:
1991:
1966:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1934:
1933:
1916:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1837:
1834:
1831:
1825:
1824:
1823:Because it is:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1796:
1795:
1765:
1764:
1746:
1745:
1726:
1725:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1701:
1684:
1683:
1661:Bosniakophobia
1645:
1644:
1621:
1600:
1599:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1568:
1546:Jenin massacre
1507:Rupert Murdoch
1500:
1499:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1362:
1361:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
951:Counter-Strike
948:is a group of
934:
933:
915:
914:
900:Counter-Strike
873:
872:
825:
824:
806:
805:
804:
803:
781:
780:
759:
758:
723:research paper
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
684:Someone's dumb
668:Living Marxism
601:Living Marxism
584:
583:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
489:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
385:
384:
383:
382:
352:
351:
318:
317:
301:
300:
282:
281:
254:
253:
244:returned 56,
233:
232:
220:
219:
191:
187:
186:
156:
116:
115:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2401:
2389:
2387:
2382:
2376:
2375:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2344:
2340:
2336:
2333:
2329:
2325:
2322:
2321:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2295:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2280:
2279:
2274:
2270:
2266:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2255:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2239:
2238:
2233:
2226:
2223:
2222:
2207:
2203:
2199:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2172:
2171:
2168:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2110:Grandy Grandy
2107:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2084:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2066:
2065:
2056:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2043:
2042:
2038:
2034:
2033:Grandy Grandy
2030:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1990:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1974:Complex Merge
1971:
1968:
1967:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1911:
1910:
1905:
1902:
1897:
1890:
1886:
1883:
1882:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1865:
1864:anti-Islamism
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1838:
1835:
1832:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1822:
1819:
1818:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1767:
1766:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1748:
1747:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1731:
1728:
1727:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1709:
1706:
1705:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1653:Strong delete
1650:
1647:
1646:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1626:
1622:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1605:
1602:
1601:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1583:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1513:admits that.
1512:
1508:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1489:Grandy Grandy
1486:
1482:
1478:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1458:
1457:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1363:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1341:
1340:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1267:Oh, and Osli
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1251:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1217:
1214:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1136:
1132:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1102:"? There was
1101:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
954:players from
953:
952:
947:
942:
938:
937:
936:
935:
932:
928:
924:
920:
917:
916:
913:
909:
905:
901:
897:
893:
890:
886:
882:
878:
875:
874:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
826:
823:
819:
815:
811:
808:
807:
802:
798:
794:
790:
785:
784:
783:
782:
779:
775:
771:
767:
766:
761:
760:
757:
753:
749:
744:
740:
736:
734:
728:
724:
720:
717:
716:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
658:
657:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
637:
633:
628:
624:
623:
622:
618:
614:
609:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
560:
556:
555:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
488:
484:
480:
476:
473:
469:
468:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
397:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
381:
377:
373:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:
349:
346:was added at
345:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
319:
316:
312:
308:
303:
302:
299:
295:
291:
287:
284:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
234:
230:
226:
222:
221:
217:
213:
209:
202:
198:
194:
193:
192:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
150:
149:
146:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
2380:
2377:
2323:
2302:
2281:
2241:
2228:
2224:
2067:
2002:
1999:Tim Marshall
1973:
1972:(added) and
1969:
1944:
1940:
1918:
1908:
1900:
1895:
1888:
1884:
1863:
1844:
1820:
1768:
1749:
1735:Live Forever
1729:
1715:HanzoHattori
1691:HanzoHattori
1665:Croatophobia
1652:
1648:
1634:HanzoHattori
1628:
1611:HanzoHattori
1578:
1553:
1550:Tim Marshall
1532:HanzoHattori
1472:Bosnian Jedi
1459:
1437:HanzoHattori
1432:
1381:
1367:HanzoHattori
1342:
1316:HanzoHattori
1273:HanzoHattori
1227:HanzoHattori
1172:HanzoHattori
1112:HanzoHattori
1040:HanzoHattori
1008:
996:HanzoHattori
975:
949:
945:
918:
904:HanzoHattori
888:
884:
880:
862:HanzoHattori
841:
829:
809:
770:HanzoHattori
764:
763:
732:
730:
718:
700:HanzoHattori
696:The Guardian
695:
691:
667:
664:The Guardian
663:
660:The Guardian
659:
643:the Guardian
627:The Guardian
613:HanzoHattori
592:
531:HanzoHattori
496:
458:HanzoHattori
402:HanzoHattori
395:
393:
357:HanzoHattori
321:
307:HanzoHattori
285:
271:HanzoHattori
252:returned 72.
228:
208:Nick Dowling
196:
190:
162:try to keep
159:
117:
45:
43:
31:
28:
2242:Yahel Guhan
1923:Raoulduke47
1833:fabrication
1657:Serbophobia
1554:eight times
1431:as such is
1347:Victor Bout
1058:BBC article
984:Bosnian war
731:The Afghan-
690:", allows
682:; and even
666:said about
562:—Preceding
342:—Preceding
236:This while
2361:Hereward77
2335:Bless sins
2198:Hereward77
2153:Hereward77
2147:How about
2124:Hereward77
2091:How about
2047:Hereward77
2029:Mujahideen
2015:Hereward77
2003:mujahideen
1953:Hereward77
1945:mujahideen
1868:Hereward77
1830:a POV fork
1804:Hereward77
1673:Vseferović
1558:Hereward77
1518:Hereward77
1403:Hereward77
1351:Hereward77
1125:to be)? --
1104:El Mujahid
980:mujahideen
889:foreigners
858:El Mujahid
854:El Mujahid
838:mujahideen
501:Hereward77
174:. Thanks.
50:TigerShark
2303:Asim Led,
2097:Jehochman
2078:, etc. --
1986:Jehochman
1845:Regards.
1417:neologism
290:• Gene93k
120:neologism
2286:Asim Led
2265:Asim Led
2190:Islamism
2176:Asim Led
2009:report:
2007:Sky News
1663:", and "
1511:Sky News
974:(titled
972:Internet
964:fragging
956:Sarajevo
814:Prevalis
589:this guy
576:contribs
568:Amijames
564:unsigned
414:British
176:Vassyana
136:Vassyana
1919:Delete.
1821:Delete.
1785:Biophys
1769:Comment
1544:Go to "
1433:another
1429:notable
992:sarcasm
970:on the
885:foreign
454:Gurkhas
416:Gurkhas
344:comment
286:Comment
132:notable
89:protect
84:history
2357:Matt57
2324:Rename
2307:Osli73
2282:Delete
2246:Osli73
2167:Matt57
2140:Matt57
2080:Matt57
1970:Delete
1754:HarisM
1750:Delete
1730:Delete
1649:Delete
1460:Delete
1386:Osli73
1013:Osli73
923:Osli73
842:DELETE
748:Osli73
493:WP:OSE
471:Crown,
168:polite
160:Please
93:delete
2236:Guhan
2231:Yahel
1632:). --
1382:Hanzo
1110:). --
1009:Hanzo
994:.) --
986:(see
968:video
919:Hanzo
396:often
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
2365:talk
2359:. --
2339:talk
2326:to "
2311:talk
2290:talk
2269:talk
2250:talk
2225:Keep
2202:talk
2180:talk
2157:talk
2151:? --
2128:talk
2114:talk
2068:Keep
2051:talk
2037:talk
2019:talk
1957:talk
1927:talk
1885:Keep
1872:talk
1851:talk
1808:talk
1789:talk
1758:talk
1739:talk
1719:talk
1695:talk
1677:talk
1659:", "
1638:talk
1630:war.
1615:talk
1593:talk
1579:Keep
1562:talk
1536:talk
1522:talk
1493:talk
1464:OSLI
1441:talk
1421:NPOV
1407:talk
1390:talk
1371:talk
1355:talk
1343:Keep
1320:talk
1277:talk
1231:talk
1176:talk
1131:talk
1116:talk
1098:or "
1096:OMON
1066:talk
1044:talk
1017:talk
1000:talk
927:talk
908:talk
866:talk
832:no "
830:even
818:talk
810:Keep
797:talk
774:talk
752:talk
727:book
725:and
719:Keep
704:talk
651:talk
617:talk
572:talk
535:talk
521:to "
505:talk
483:talk
462:talk
448:OK:
424:talk
406:talk
376:talk
361:talk
338:talk
324:see
322:Keep
311:talk
294:talk
275:talk
212:talk
197:Note
180:talk
166:and
164:cool
140:talk
124:NPOV
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
2074:or
1903:god
1894:The
895:862
891:").
340:)
203:.
2367:)
2341:)
2313:)
2292:)
2271:)
2252:)
2204:)
2196:--
2182:)
2159:)
2130:)
2116:)
2108:.
2053:)
2039:)
2021:)
2013:--
1959:)
1929:)
1912:)
1901:AR
1896:FE
1891:--
1874:)
1853:)
1810:)
1791:)
1775:,
1760:)
1741:)
1721:)
1697:)
1679:)
1640:)
1617:)
1595:)
1587:.
1564:)
1538:)
1524:)
1495:)
1483:,
1479:,
1443:)
1409:)
1392:)
1373:)
1365:--
1357:)
1322:)
1279:)
1233:)
1178:)
1133:)
1118:)
1068:)
1046:)
1019:)
1002:)
958:,
929:)
910:)
868:)
852:,
848:,
820:)
799:)
776:)
754:)
706:)
692:LM
674:;
670::
653:)
619:)
611:--
599:,
578:)
574:•
537:)
507:)
485:)
477:--
464:)
452:-
426:)
408:)
378:)
370:--
363:)
332:--
313:)
305:--
296:)
277:)
265:,
261:,
214:)
182:)
142:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
2363:(
2337:(
2309:(
2288:(
2267:(
2248:(
2200:(
2178:(
2155:(
2126:(
2112:(
2049:(
2035:(
2017:(
1955:(
1925:(
1909:Ч
1906:(
1870:(
1849:(
1806:(
1787:(
1756:(
1737:(
1717:(
1693:(
1675:(
1651:(
1636:(
1613:(
1591:(
1560:(
1534:(
1520:(
1491:(
1475:(
1439:(
1405:(
1388:(
1369:(
1353:(
1318:(
1275:(
1229:(
1174:(
1129:(
1114:(
1064:(
1042:(
1015:(
998:(
925:(
906:(
864:(
816:(
795:(
772:(
750:(
746:(
702:(
649:(
615:(
607:.
570:(
533:(
503:(
481:(
460:(
422:(
404:(
374:(
359:(
336:(
309:(
292:(
273:(
210:(
206:—
178:(
138:(
114:–
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.