538:- It doesn't effect our notability rules (which revolve around what I can show you online, right now) but people seem to think she is a minor or medium character from the show. She is not, she is one of the few main characters. The show takes place in a radio station set, with the same characters every episode.. She was one of these main characters. Google books keeps bringing up non-viewable books, but I can say with a high degree of confidence, based on five years of finding and not finding refs to save articles, that sources do exist. She's a major character, from an influential show. -
281:
source material. What is meant by "the only commentary on offer"? Who's offering, other than you? There is ample "real world" secondary coverage of the subject matter, beyond the particular source you reference, and are cited in the article. The article qualifies for notability under the standards of
Knowledge, is well sourced and indeed meets and exceeds the standard for a "Good" article.
311:, and reviewed all the 'sources' on offer, which is what I referred to above as 'commentary'. The source I called-out is lightweight and from a self-published source, but at least it is a few paragraphs on the character while all the others amount to passing mentions dredged up with Google. Happy editing,
280:
This is the second time that someone has merged this article with no notice and no prior discussion. The comments above in favor of merger or deletion are so far divorced from what is actually in the article that I am led to question whetehr Mr
Merridew even bothered to read either the article or the
324:
on
September 26, 2009 without prior notice, proposal or discussion, and again by the same editor on September 28, 2009. It was restored (twice), extensively edited, and discussed on the Talk Page. Eusebeus apparently was satisfied, as he let the matter drop. Second, it was once again redirected by
348:
No. In other words, you don't know the difference between a merger and a redirect, you've mischaracterized your own actions here, and you can't count. And, I'd venture that you don't know what an editwar is either, except that it's pretty clear from your edit history and talkpage that you know
445:
It's called a low standard of referencing. The appropriate outcome here is ditching this heap of fanwank and using the "Hathor Legacy" piece to add a brief nugget of encyclopaedic content to the character summary in the list. Happy editing,
200:
Non-notable minor fictional character from WKRP. article has been restored post-merge, twice. It is mostly plot summary and OR/SYNTH, and the "sources" are seem to amount to every trivial ghit out there. The only commentary on offer is:
600:
169:
253:
339:
In other words, you've been editwaring with at least three other editors about redirecting this character article to a more appropriate summary in the list of characters. Happy editing,
124:
163:
224:
597:
431:
It's called research. If you actually have a substantive comment to make in support of your proposal, I'm sure we'd all be interested in reading it.
547:
480:
The premise of your argument is fatally flawed. Bailey is one of the seven principal characters in an ensemble cast, not a secondary character.
413:
129:
97:
92:
560:
101:
563:), but she was indeed one of the principals. That plus the woman in a man's job aspect and the Bailey vs. Jennifer comparison (a la
84:
17:
184:
151:
325:
you on
January 18, 2010, again without prior notice, proposal or discussion. After I restored it, you commenced this AFD.
543:
409:
680:
628:
145:
36:
656:
Sufficient sources to indicate notability. Nominator's accusation of faking references is troubling and false.
584:. Clearly one of the principals, and I see no convincing evidence that the references are in any way "faked".
679:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
665:
648:
631:
611:
588:
576:
551:
528:
512:
489:
473:
450:
440:
426:
417:
396:
367:
358:
343:
334:
315:
290:
271:
242:
213:
141:
66:
572:
539:
405:
191:
621:
349:
exactly what an editwar is, and that my edits on this article don't qualify as even a minor skirmish.
88:
422:
trivial mentions dredged up off teh interwebs. They amount to faking references; the bar is higher.
661:
508:
177:
644:
564:
469:
447:
423:
364:
340:
312:
300:
210:
568:
523:
485:
436:
391:
354:
330:
286:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
157:
80:
72:
619:
per being a major character in a notable series. Sorry Jack, nothing minor about Bailey.
657:
607:
504:
640:
585:
465:
321:
308:
262:
233:
299:
merged, not merged a second (or moar) time. There is more than adequate coverage at
518:
500:
481:
432:
386:
350:
326:
282:
202:
118:
320:
To be precise, it wasn't merged in either instance. First, it was redirected by
603:
559:. She got maybe the least airtime of the main characters (either her or
517:
No, if it's redirected, it should be redirected to the WKRP article.—
596:- as one of the principal characters in show with coverage such as
673:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
503:, the actress who portrayed her on WKRP in Cincinnati.
639:
One of the principal characters in a notable series. -
464:
and redirect per consensus about secondary characters.
254:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
114:
110:
106:
176:
404:- Not sure what's wrong with all those book refs. -
385:She wasn't a "minor" character on the show, FWIW.—
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
683:). No further edits should be made to this page.
225:list of Television-related deletion discussions
190:
8:
248:
219:
252:: This debate has been included in the
223:: This debate has been included in the
7:
24:
363:sometime 2+2=5. Happy editing,
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
301:WKRP in Cincinnati#Characters
205:; not enough, in my opinion.
666:18:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
649:17:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
632:05:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
612:19:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
589:13:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
577:09:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
552:05:29, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
529:16:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
513:02:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
490:22:33, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
474:21:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
451:21:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
441:20:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
427:20:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
418:19:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
397:19:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
368:21:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
359:20:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
344:20:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
335:20:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
316:19:45, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
291:19:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
272:19:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
243:19:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
214:19:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
67:21:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
700:
567:) tip the scales for me.
676:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
565:Ginger vs. Mary Ann
44:The result was
274:
270:
257:
245:
241:
228:
691:
678:
624:
540:Peregrine Fisher
526:
521:
406:Peregrine Fisher
394:
389:
295:The article was
269:
266:
260:
258:
240:
237:
231:
229:
195:
194:
180:
132:
122:
104:
64:
34:
699:
698:
694:
693:
692:
690:
689:
688:
687:
681:deletion review
674:
622:
524:
519:
392:
387:
264:
261:
235:
232:
137:
128:
95:
81:Bailey Quarters
79:
76:
73:Bailey Quarters
60:
56:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
697:
695:
686:
685:
669:
668:
651:
634:
614:
591:
579:
554:
533:
532:
531:
493:
492:
477:
476:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
399:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
322:User: Eusebeus
275:
246:
198:
197:
134:
130:AfD statistics
75:
70:
58:
54:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
696:
684:
682:
677:
671:
670:
667:
663:
659:
655:
652:
650:
646:
642:
638:
635:
633:
630:
629:
626:
625:
618:
615:
613:
609:
605:
601:
598:
595:
592:
590:
587:
583:
580:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
561:Venus Flytrap
558:
555:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
534:
530:
527:
522:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
495:
494:
491:
487:
483:
479:
478:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
452:
449:
448:Jack Merridew
444:
443:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
428:
425:
424:Jack Merridew
421:
420:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
400:
398:
395:
390:
384:
381:
369:
366:
365:Jack Merridew
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
347:
346:
345:
342:
341:Jack Merridew
338:
337:
336:
332:
328:
323:
319:
318:
317:
314:
313:Jack Merridew
310:
307:the article,
306:
302:
298:
294:
293:
292:
288:
284:
279:
276:
273:
268:
267:
255:
251:
247:
244:
239:
238:
226:
222:
218:
217:
216:
215:
212:
211:Jack Merridew
208:
204:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
63:
62:
61:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
675:
672:
653:
636:
627:
620:
616:
593:
581:
569:Clarityfiend
556:
535:
501:Jan Smithers
496:
461:
401:
382:
304:
296:
277:
263:
249:
234:
220:
206:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
53:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
164:free images
297:previously
57:rbitrarily
658:Edward321
557:Weak keep
505:Mandsford
303:. I have
265:Gongshow
236:Gongshow
641:Ret.Prof
623:Schmidt,
548:contribs
497:Redirect
466:Eusebeus
414:contribs
125:View log
536:Comment
520:Chowbok
482:Fladrif
433:Fladrif
388:Chowbok
383:Comment
351:Fladrif
327:Fladrif
283:Fladrif
170:WP refs
158:scholar
98:protect
93:history
599:, and
586:Powers
462:Delete
309:thanks
207:Delete
142:Google
102:delete
637:Keep:
602:. --
278:Keep.
185:JSTOR
146:books
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
662:talk
654:Keep
645:talk
617:Keep
608:talk
604:Whpq
594:Keep
582:Keep
573:talk
544:talk
509:talk
486:talk
470:talk
437:talk
410:talk
402:Keep
355:talk
331:talk
305:read
287:talk
250:Note
221:Note
203:this
178:FENS
152:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
46:keep
546:) (
499:to
412:) (
192:TWL
127:•
123:– (
664:)
647:)
610:)
575:)
550:)
511:)
488:)
472:)
439:)
416:)
357:)
333:)
289:)
256:.
227:.
209:.
172:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
48:.
660:(
643:(
606:(
571:(
542:(
525:☠
507:(
484:(
468:(
435:(
408:(
393:☠
353:(
329:(
285:(
259:—
230:—
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
121:)
83:(
59:0
55:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.