428:-- "Non-commercial organizations". Within WP:NONPROFIT there is an a+b test ("Organizations are usually notable if they meet both of the following standards:" national/international scope + multiple reliable sources), AND that is followed by a section that says "Additional considerations are" which describes other cases that do not fit within the a+b guidelines but still are notable -- e.g., local organizations with national/int'l coverage; "factors that have attracted widespread attention" which includes longevity, size of membership, major achievements, prominent scandals, or other factors specific to the organization .... (+ independent sources). --
534:
339:- Does seem to be small according to the article (only 3 chapters) so rather local; but the organization is getting on to 50 years old, and it was an Asian American Greek organization begun at a time when those were exceedingly rare; and it has continued to this day. I would give those two factors enough weight under
460:
I haven't tried to find sources, so it's a bit presumptuous to say I can't show them (or they can't be shown). Have you tried to find sources and been unable to? Your nomination does not make that clear. If sources exist but are simply not in the article, AND it otherwise meets some criteria in
469:'s application here or my thoughts on it, by all means say so. If your beef is simply the sources, then is it that (a) sources can NOT be found, because you have tried, or (b) no sources currently exist in the article? --
391:
says under "Additional considerations". These need to be "reported by independent sources" of course. Based on the facts of the organization, without looking for RS, these additional considerations support keeping, IMO.
170:
250:
164:
125:
230:
206:
130:
98:
93:
102:
465:, then that's a reason to slate the article for improvement; not deletion for lack of notability. If you've got a problem with
361:: this is neither a national group, nor is it "verified by multiple, third-party, independent, reliable sources," also known as
85:
17:
185:
213:, a local fraternity of this sort must have its notability established by third party sources: here, no such sources exist.
152:
442:...and yet, you can show no independent sources, which are still required under your most generous interpretation of the
379:
Well, that's the two-part test and I don't argue that this org passes based on the two-part test (I haven't done the
565:
40:
533:
Completely unverified and unsourced, and apparently not notable. A Google search turned up nothing independent;
146:
515:
290:
63:, these sources do not appear to exist. As such the article does not warrant inclusion at this moment in time.
546:
521:
478:
455:
437:
419:
401:
374:
352:
327:
296:
264:
242:
222:
142:
67:
89:
561:
36:
192:
81:
73:
511:
466:
462:
451:
443:
425:
415:
388:
370:
358:
340:
286:
218:
178:
53:
542:
474:
433:
397:
348:
323:
260:
238:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
560:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
500:
308:
275:
158:
447:
411:
366:
214:
538:
470:
429:
407:
393:
362:
344:
202:
52:. As has been noted below, although the organisation may well have met the criteria
380:
319:
256:
234:
60:
406:
I'm confused. You !vote keep based on the presence of alternate tests other than
119:
210:
57:
64:
503:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
410:, but you aren't able to show that the topic satisfies the alternate tests?--
311:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
278:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
343:
to keep it for now, and try to solicit some interest in improvement. --
554:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
383:
search myself, though). What I am saying is that there are
205:. No national organization or oversight; not recognized by
115:
111:
107:
177:
510:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
318:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
285:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
251:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
568:). No further edits should be made to this page.
191:
8:
249:Note: This debate has been included in the
231:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
229:Note: This debate has been included in the
248:
228:
207:North-American Interfraternity Conference
201:Non-notable local fraternity. Fails
7:
424:I am using the alternate guideline,
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
387:criteria to be considered, as
1:
585:
547:21:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
68:15:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
522:23:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
479:16:53, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
456:11:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
438:10:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
420:21:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
402:13:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
375:00:06, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
353:22:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
328:12:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
297:02:28, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
557:Please do not modify it.
537:found nothing at all. --
265:14:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
243:14:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
223:11:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
54:set out in WP:NONPROFIT
357:None of the points in
535:Google News Archive
48:The result was
524:
359:WP:NONPROFITapply
330:
299:
267:
254:
245:
576:
559:
518:
509:
505:
317:
313:
293:
284:
280:
255:
196:
195:
181:
133:
123:
105:
61:reliable sources
34:
584:
583:
579:
578:
577:
575:
574:
573:
572:
566:deletion review
555:
520:
516:
498:
306:
295:
291:
273:
138:
129:
96:
80:
77:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
582:
580:
571:
570:
550:
549:
527:
526:
525:
514:
512:The Bushranger
507:
506:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
333:
332:
331:
315:
314:
303:
302:
301:
300:
289:
287:The Bushranger
282:
281:
270:
269:
268:
246:
199:
198:
135:
82:Beta Omega Phi
76:
74:Beta Omega Phi
71:
56:if there were
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
581:
569:
567:
563:
558:
552:
551:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
529:
528:
523:
519:
517:One ping only
513:
508:
504:
502:
497:
496:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
459:
458:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:
403:
399:
395:
390:
386:
382:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
355:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
335:
334:
329:
325:
321:
316:
312:
310:
305:
304:
298:
294:
292:One ping only
288:
283:
279:
277:
272:
271:
266:
262:
258:
252:
247:
244:
240:
236:
232:
227:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
72:
70:
69:
66:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
556:
553:
530:
499:
467:WP:NONPROFIT
463:WP:NONPROFIT
444:WP:NONPROFIT
426:WP:NONPROFIT
389:WP:NONPROFIT
384:
341:WP:NONPROFIT
336:
307:
274:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
49:
47:
31:
28:
165:free images
58:verifiable
562:talk page
448:GrapedApe
412:GrapedApe
367:GrapedApe
257:• Gene93k
235:• Gene93k
215:GrapedApe
37:talk page
564:or in a
539:MelanieN
501:Relisted
471:Lquilter
430:Lquilter
394:Lquilter
345:Lquilter
309:Relisted
276:Relisted
126:View log
39:or in a
320:BusterD
209:. per
171:WP refs
159:scholar
99:protect
94:history
531:Delete
408:WP:GNG
363:WP:GNG
203:WP:ORG
143:Google
103:delete
50:Delete
385:other
381:WP:RS
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
120:views
112:watch
108:links
65:Panyd
16:<
543:talk
475:talk
452:talk
434:talk
416:talk
398:talk
371:talk
349:talk
337:Keep
324:talk
261:talk
239:talk
219:talk
211:WP:N
179:FENS
153:news
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
446:.--
365:.--
193:TWL
128:•
124:– (
545:)
477:)
454:)
436:)
418:)
400:)
392:--
373:)
351:)
326:)
263:)
253:.
241:)
233:.
221:)
173:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
541:(
473:(
450:(
432:(
414:(
396:(
369:(
347:(
322:(
259:(
237:(
217:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
122:)
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.