152:
Response. Why I call it wrong is that the contesting user decided to demand consensus on an article that doesn't even toe the line of notability. If you look at the discussion here you can see that the consensus points to a resounding "delete", and my issue is that the extra work of the editors that
142:
Comment. There's no such thing as wrongly deprodding an article. The rationale was that is appeared to be notable as it states the diner was featured on FoodTV and in a food magazine. You may disagree that it makes it notable enough to keep, or have concerns about verifying the claim, but that
84:
trumps the Google test any day. Calton's argument is strong, which is why I'm closing as "no consensus" instead of a straight out "keep". If you disagree, DRV is as always -----------------------: -->
626:
Doesn't compare very well. Hmm, but those are too upscale, you say? Okay, let's go downscale, using the type of eating places the Sterns have raved about in their
262:
518:
reference, I ought to point out, is from Jane and
Michael Stern's "Roadfood" column, their look at backroads diners and other vernacular places.
153:
listed the article here and then voted could have been better spent improving
Knowledge in other ways; that's why I call it wrongly removed.
254:
52:, which (I've checked) is absolutely correct. The delete argument is made by only two people, each with different reasoning.
17:
792:
495:, Monicasdude. I know it's tempting to jump straight for thinking the worst of people at times, but this is Knowledge.
414:
77:
66:) points to the article being unverifiable which, it must be said, doesn't appear to be the case from what I can tell.
478:
Trying out those mind-reading courses you took? The money would have been better spent on anger-management classes. --
120:
80:) complains of a lack of Google hits, and he's quite right — but real, live publications that get the article past
63:
258:
814:
36:
813:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
523:
Meanwhile, checking and comparing search results for "Becky's Diner" with other, actually famous restaurants:
797:
777:
504:
500:
486:
473:
457:
419:
366:
354:
342:
314:
302:
288:
243:
211:
199:
187:
175:
157:
147:
133:
97:
93:
787:
730:
409:
283:
238:
658:
57:
299:
272:
227:
183:
being featured on the Food
Network can be considered as establishing at least marginal notability.
569:
496:
89:
196:
53:
676:
380:
277:
232:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
774:
712:
694:
483:
470:
351:
333:
144:
71:
587:
172:
748:
605:
103:
783:
375:
81:
49:
469:
is systematically bringing disputed prods to AfD without regard to merits of dispute.
492:
466:
428:
117:
85:
551:
363:
267:
222:
110:
253:. While they have been mentioned in several places (including a small bit in the
770:
479:
323:
311:
184:
154:
130:
113:
which was removed so bringing it to AfD. Yes, it's a diner folks. Nn - suggest
67:
208:
48:. The keep argument is that the diner surpasses the notability guidelines at
386:
400:
362:
Knowledge is not a travel guide, nor is it free advertising space. --
220:, it's just a diner that someone on a show ate in. Not notable. --
807:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
395:
322:, shouldn't this kind of stuff be speedy deleted? --
195:
Issues with verifiability prevent me from keeping.--
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
129:, wrongly deprodded by a chronic deprodding user.
817:). No further edits should be made to this page.
171:under the rationale that, um, it's a diner. --
350:. Improper use of AfD. Nothin' to vote for. --
8:
143:doesn't make removing the prod tag "wrong."
635:
528:
261:Food Network anyway, and they have just
298:, nn, or more correctly - REALLY NN -,
7:
769:Still falling short, it appears. --
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
378:with multiple media mentions (
1:
44:The result of the debate was
310:NN, looks like an ad to me.
406:Eat Your Way Across the USA
207:Non notable local business.
834:
798:12:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
778:06:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
505:15:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
487:06:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
474:14:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
458:20:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
420:14:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
367:06:32, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
355:05:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
343:22:02, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
315:18:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
303:17:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
289:20:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
244:16:49, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
212:16:13, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
200:15:53, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
188:15:32, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
176:14:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
158:19:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
148:00:11, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
134:14:46, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
121:14:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
98:15:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
810:Please do not modify it.
465:, bad faith nomination.
32:Please do not modify it.
398:also lists mentions in
514:. Minorly famous. The
257:), they're apparently
102:
590:'s" -book -cookbook
396:The official website
782:So you don't think
731:Sylvia's restaurant
659:Mary Mac's Tea Room
630:books and columns:
572:" -book -cookbook
570:The French Laundry
554:" -book -cookbook
796:
764:
763:
677:Swan Oyster Depot
621:
620:
493:assume good faith
427:- Notable enough
418:
339:
825:
812:
790:
636:
529:
456:
454:
449:
448:
442:
441:
435:
433:
412:
381:Gourmet Magazine
338:
335:
331:
328:
275:
230:
34:
833:
832:
828:
827:
826:
824:
823:
822:
821:
815:deletion review
808:
713:Doe's Eat Place
695:Arthur Bryant's
588:Charlie Trotter
452:
450:
446:
445:
439:
438:
431:
429:
340:
336:
329:
324:
286:
273:
265:Google hits. --
241:
228:
107:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
831:
829:
820:
819:
803:
802:
801:
800:
788:badlydrawnjeff
766:
765:
762:
761:
758:
755:
752:
744:
743:
740:
737:
734:
726:
725:
722:
719:
716:
708:
707:
704:
701:
698:
690:
689:
686:
683:
680:
672:
671:
668:
665:
662:
654:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
632:
631:
623:
622:
619:
618:
615:
612:
609:
601:
600:
597:
594:
591:
583:
582:
579:
576:
573:
565:
564:
561:
558:
555:
547:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
533:
525:
524:
520:
519:
509:
508:
507:
491:Please try to
489:
460:
422:
410:badlydrawnjeff
372:Strongest Keep
369:
357:
345:
334:
317:
305:
293:
292:
291:
284:
255:New York Times
239:
214:
202:
190:
178:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
160:
137:
136:
106:
101:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
830:
818:
816:
811:
805:
804:
799:
794:
789:
785:
781:
780:
779:
776:
772:
768:
767:
759:
756:
753:
750:
749:Becky's Diner
746:
745:
741:
738:
735:
732:
728:
727:
723:
720:
717:
714:
710:
709:
705:
702:
699:
696:
692:
691:
687:
684:
681:
678:
674:
673:
669:
666:
663:
660:
656:
655:
651:
646:
641:
638:
637:
634:
633:
629:
625:
624:
616:
613:
610:
607:
606:Becky's Diner
603:
602:
598:
595:
592:
589:
585:
584:
580:
577:
574:
571:
567:
566:
562:
559:
556:
553:
549:
548:
544:
539:
534:
531:
530:
527:
526:
522:
521:
517:
513:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
488:
485:
481:
477:
476:
475:
472:
468:
464:
461:
459:
455:
444:
437:
434:
426:
423:
421:
416:
411:
407:
404:and the book
403:
402:
397:
393:
389:
388:
383:
382:
377:
373:
370:
368:
365:
361:
358:
356:
353:
349:
348:Delete speedy
346:
344:
341:
332:
327:
321:
318:
316:
313:
309:
306:
304:
301:
297:
296:Strong delete
294:
290:
287:
282:
281:
280:
276:
271:
270:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
242:
237:
236:
235:
231:
226:
225:
219:
218:Strong delete
215:
213:
210:
206:
203:
201:
198:
194:
191:
189:
186:
182:
179:
177:
174:
170:
167:
166:
159:
156:
151:
150:
149:
146:
141:
140:
139:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:
123:
122:
119:
116:
112:
105:
104:Becky's Diner
100:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
76:
73:
69:
65:
62:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
809:
806:
627:
552:Chez Panisse
535:Google hits
515:
511:
462:
451:
443:
430:
424:
405:
399:
391:
385:
379:
371:
359:
347:
325:
319:
307:
295:
278:
268:
266:
250:
249:Changing to
233:
223:
221:
217:
216:
204:
192:
180:
168:
126:
114:
111:User:Rory096
108:
74:
60:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
786:applies? --
647:Google hits
642:Google hits
540:Google hits
471:Monicasdude
463:Speedy Keep
352:MaNeMeBasat
193:Weak Delete
145:Thatcher131
109:prodded by
88:. Cheers,
639:Restaurant
532:Restaurant
501:fuddle me!
497:fuddlemark
173:Kicking222
94:fuddle me!
90:fuddlemark
793:WP:MEMES?
415:WP:MEMES?
181:Weak keep
628:Roadfood
557:161,000
467:Eusebeus
387:Frommers
374:, meets
300:San Saba
118:Eusebeus
86:that way
78:contribs
64:contribs
784:WP:CORP
736:12,300
718:15,500
706:25,600
700:38,600
688:13,300
682:50,100
664:56,500
652:Yahoo!
644:overall
599:32,300
593:92,400
581:52,100
575:89,400
563:78,800
545:Yahoo!
537:overall
516:Gourmet
436:astique
401:Esquire
392:Food TV
376:WP:CORP
285:(block)
251:neutral
240:(block)
82:WP:CORP
50:WP:CORP
771:Calton
742:1,820
724:1,790
670:2,450
649:unique
542:unique
512:Delete
480:Calton
408:. --
364:Icarus
360:Delete
320:Delete
312:Shijaz
308:Delete
259:paying
205:Delete
185:Hirudo
169:Delete
155:Kuzaar
131:Kuzaar
127:Delete
115:Delete
68:Calton
330:eptor
209:Obina
16:<
775:Talk
760:346
757:203
754:528
739:438
721:422
703:514
685:397
667:350
617:346
614:203
611:528
596:694
578:718
560:773
484:Talk
425:Keep
394:).
384:and
337:talk
269:Rory
224:Rory
197:Cini
72:talk
58:talk
54:Cini
263:518
773:|
751:"
733:"
715:"
697:"
679:"
661:"
608:"
503:)
482:|
390:,
279:96
234:96
96:)
795:)
791:(
747:"
729:"
711:"
693:"
675:"
657:"
604:"
586:"
568:"
550:"
499:(
453:♑
447:♥
440:▼
432:ℬ
417:)
413:(
326:H
274:0
229:0
92:(
75:·
70:(
61:·
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.