Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Beings (film) - Knowledge

Source 📝

347:
Actually, I normally create articles about "terrible" films (or less known films) and I rarely have issues. Normally, if a film was reviewed by media outlets it's considered "notable" even when (like in this specific case) the film is just
203: 303:
First of all, it's not required for a movie to be widely-released or released in theaters to have a stand-alone article here. Second, I added sources that prove that the article was reviewed by independent
281: 156: 197: 261: 103: 88: 163: 326: 129: 124: 133: 218: 83: 76: 17: 185: 116: 97: 93: 179: 433: 40: 175: 416: 399: 395: 378: 357: 338: 313: 292: 273: 253: 58: 225: 429: 36: 329:(it got a 33 % on Rotten Tomatoes) can be notable. On the other hand, it didn't get a lot of reviews. 412: 374: 353: 309: 269: 211: 322: 120: 191: 391: 334: 285: 72: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
428:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
408: 370: 239: 349: 305: 265: 243: 235: 112: 64: 330: 150: 54: 424:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
146: 142: 138: 210: 390:Tofu Nerdpunk). It just wasn't good or bad enough. 282:
list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 436:). No further edits should be made to this page. 280:Note: This discussion has been included in the 260:Note: This discussion has been included in the 386:per nom. Only one review by a reliable source ( 224: 8: 104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 369:. Cast is notable enough for retention. -- 234:Direct to video film, does not meet either 279: 259: 262:list of Film-related deletion discussions 7: 24: 89:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 314:03:30, 30 November 2019 (UTC) 293:16:46, 29 November 2019 (UTC) 274:16:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC) 254:16:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC) 417:03:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC) 400:20:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC) 379:11:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC) 358:02:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC) 339:00:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC) 59:17:13, 6 December 2019 (UTC) 407:bad films are notable too. 79:(AfD)? Read these primers! 453: 426:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 77:Articles for deletion 295: 276: 94:Guide to deletion 84:How to contribute 444: 290: 250: 247: 229: 228: 214: 166: 154: 136: 74: 34: 452: 451: 447: 446: 445: 443: 442: 441: 440: 434:deletion review 286: 248: 245: 171: 162: 127: 111: 108: 71: 68: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 450: 448: 439: 438: 420: 419: 402: 381: 363: 362: 361: 360: 342: 341: 327:terrible films 316: 297: 296: 277: 232: 231: 168: 107: 106: 101: 91: 86: 69: 67: 62: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 449: 437: 435: 431: 427: 422: 421: 418: 414: 410: 406: 403: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 382: 380: 376: 372: 368: 365: 364: 359: 355: 351: 346: 345: 344: 343: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 317: 315: 311: 307: 302: 299: 298: 294: 291: 289: 283: 278: 275: 271: 267: 263: 258: 257: 256: 255: 252: 251: 241: 237: 227: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 177: 174: 173:Find sources: 169: 165: 161: 158: 152: 148: 144: 140: 135: 131: 126: 122: 118: 114: 113:Beings (film) 110: 109: 105: 102: 99: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 81: 80: 78: 73: 66: 65:Beings (film) 63: 61: 60: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 425: 423: 404: 392:Clarityfiend 387: 383: 366: 318: 300: 288:CAPTAIN RAJU 287: 244: 233: 221: 215: 207: 200: 194: 188: 182: 172: 159: 70: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 198:free images 409:Lightburst 371:Necrothesp 304:sources.-- 430:talk page 350:SirEdimon 323:consensus 319:Weak keep 306:SirEdimon 266:Shellwood 37:talk page 432:or in a 348:awful.-- 240:WP:NFILM 157:View log 98:glossary 39:or in a 331:Bearian 321:- it's 204:WP refs 192:scholar 130:protect 125:history 75:New to 384:Delete 236:WP:GNG 176:Google 134:delete 325:that 219:JSTOR 180:books 164:Stats 151:views 143:watch 139:links 16:< 413:talk 405:Keep 396:talk 375:talk 367:Keep 354:talk 335:talk 310:talk 301:Keep 270:talk 249:5969 246:Onel 212:FENS 186:news 147:logs 121:talk 117:edit 55:Tone 50:keep 388:not 238:or 226:TWL 155:– ( 415:) 398:) 377:) 356:) 337:) 312:) 284:. 272:) 264:. 242:. 206:) 149:| 145:| 141:| 137:| 132:| 128:| 123:| 119:| 52:. 411:( 394:( 373:( 352:( 333:( 308:( 268:( 230:) 222:· 216:· 208:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 183:· 178:( 170:( 167:) 160:· 153:) 115:( 100:) 96:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Tone
17:13, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Beings (film)

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Beings (film)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.