259:
2009 just past 112). Then van
Hasselt was the oldest living person (allegedly) until she died on October 17, 2009. It's not clear who was the next oldest but it seems like it may have been Cornelis Jacobus Geurtz who died on 21 August 2012 at age 110 and 109 days but he would have been 107 and change when van Hasselt died (he was only five months younger) but it's possible that there were others who died between 107 and 110 and thus wouldn't be in the GRG charts. --
258:
Dutch person for four days. While not organized ideally, the oldest living person in that year were
Catharina H. Peters-Keultjes (died 20 March 2009 at just above age 111), then Johanna H.M.C. Boost-Dalloyaux (died 1 June 2009 at 110 years and quite a bit) and then Grietje Jansen-Anker (at 13 October
303:
not enough detail for an article, and poor sourcing for a claim to being oldest in NL. Is this oldest for 4 days thing an OR claim by
Knowledge, GRG or some real authority like the Govt? (Sorry hard to translate everything on this device). I am really liking her 'predecessor' title holder - who told
225:
197:
Oldest living Dutch person for FOUR WHOLE DAYS! Article completely devoid of content about the subject except for birth and death dates (sourced to unreliable crowdsourced site), city where she born, and year she moved to a nursing home.
304:
the media to stay away from her and the town mayor he could not bring a cake to her birthday party. No exploitation for amusement of this old women! and her article, written in the same formula, is going to AfD too.
166:
229:
160:
119:
322:
See my links above in my first comment. The claim is based on the second source here. The GRG has no involvement since she never lived to age 110 when they take note. --
126:
92:
87:
96:
79:
181:
251:
148:
17:
142:
366:
40:
382:
347:
331:
313:
295:
268:
241:
207:
61:
138:
290:
83:
188:
362:
36:
254:
gives you a better idea of the pointlessness and complexity to prove her claim that she was the oldest
327:
264:
237:
57:
343:
309:
174:
285:
75:
67:
154:
338:
Ya, not enough. Even her sister was older, but happened to live across the border in
Belguim.
221:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
361:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
217:
323:
260:
233:
53:
339:
305:
203:
284:
and justify a stand-alone article, and there is no obvious merge/redirect target.
113:
281:
383:
http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2009/10/the_netherlands_oldest_residen/
199:
216:
The three sources are Dutch which isn't fatal but they aren't particularly
280:
I'm not seeing evidence of the type of coverage that would satisfy
355:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
224:
obituary-style reporting. The first I think is dead, the
109:
105:
101:
173:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
369:). No further edits should be made to this page.
187:
8:
375:
7:
24:
252:List of Dutch supercentenarians
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
228:tells us almost nothing as is
220:of any length and likely just
1:
62:00:45, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
348:14:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
332:20:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
314:13:41, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
296:06:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
269:05:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
242:05:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
208:04:13, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
401:
358:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
230:the third (translated)
218:significant coverage
226:second (translated)
76:Bertha van Hasselt
68:Bertha van Hasselt
392:
385:
380:
360:
293:
288:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
48:The result was
34:
400:
399:
395:
394:
393:
391:
390:
389:
388:
381:
377:
373:
367:deletion review
356:
291:
286:
250:Also note that
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
398:
396:
387:
386:
374:
372:
371:
351:
350:
336:
335:
334:
317:
316:
298:
274:
273:
272:
271:
245:
244:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
397:
384:
379:
376:
370:
368:
364:
359:
353:
352:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
320:
319:
318:
315:
311:
307:
302:
299:
297:
294:
289:
283:
279:
276:
275:
270:
266:
262:
257:
253:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
378:
357:
354:
300:
277:
255:
213:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
324:Ricky81682
261:Ricky81682
234:Ricky81682
222:WP:ROUTINE
54:Malcolmxl5
363:talk page
340:Legacypac
306:Legacypac
37:talk page
365:or in a
287:Canadian
120:View log
39:or in a
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
301:Delete
278:Delete
256:living
214:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
232:. --
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
344:talk
328:talk
310:talk
292:Paul
282:WP:N
265:talk
238:talk
204:talk
200:EEng
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
189:TWL
118:– (
346:)
330:)
312:)
267:)
240:)
206:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:--
342:(
326:(
308:(
263:(
236:(
202:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.