298:. One editor's "Yellow Pages company spam" is many others' "useful information about something you didn't know about before". The contention that "a company can have hundreds of outlets and still be totally non-notable" is bizzare as by that size there would be enough coverage to pass GNG unless a company was actively trying to avoid it. All that aside, while I can't read Norweigan a quick Google/gNews search turns up enough links about the company (including several titled newspaper articles) to indicate that this is, in fact, a Wikinotable company.
212:
with the following rationale "53 restaurants seems reasonable for an article". I disagree, having an x-outlets is not seen as a criteria of notability in any policy or guideline I am familiar with. A company can have hundreds of outlets and still be totally non-notable. As I discussed in my
475:
sources out there somewhere" after three weeks it's still only sourced to the official website, and my own searches have come up with nothing useful either. I'm a bit surprised that a chain with 50+ restaurants wouldn't have coverage necessary for
329:. Opinions here are going to be purely subjective, but I think that a chain of restaurants of this size is definitely notable. I would suggest that such a chain in Britain or the United States wouldn't have a chance of being deleted. --
169:
256:
122:
163:
438:-- Something remarkable about the menu? No. Business model? No. Number of outlets? In Norway perhaps. A promotional means to get to the top of Google searches? Absolutely.
275:
237:
214:
200:
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing
346:
size of the chain at 50 odd is irrelevant. what matters is coverage. 6 odd gnews hits doesn't meet GNG and WP:CORP when some of it looks routine.
95:
90:
129:
201:
99:
305:
82:
184:
205:
151:
17:
472:
283:
145:
413:
364:
512:
495:
461:
447:
428:
404:
385:
355:
338:
321:
287:
267:
248:
229:
64:
531:
400:
40:
141:
315:
86:
191:
279:
527:
424:
36:
457:
396:
334:
311:
177:
78:
70:
157:
351:
261:
242:
223:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
526:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
508:
443:
453:
330:
209:
488:
376:
55:
347:
219:
116:
504:
477:
439:
481:
503:. Enough coverage from Norwegian newspapers to establish notability. --
395:
the amount of coverage is not enough to show notability for a company.
520:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
416:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
367:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
217:, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam.
452:
What has only being in Norway got to do with anything? --
112:
108:
104:
176:
422:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
373:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
257:
list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
534:). No further edits should be made to this page.
306:WP:Company articles are not automatically spam
276:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
190:
8:
274:Note: This debate has been included in the
255:Note: This debate has been included in the
236:Note: This debate has been included in the
238:list of Norway-related deletion discussions
273:
254:
235:
471:- despite all the cries of "but there
202:Knowledge:General notability guideline
220:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
480:, but that seems to be the reality.
208:requirement. " It was deprodded by
24:
304:really needs to write the essay
206:Knowledge:Notability (companies)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
496:13:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
462:13:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
448:14:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
429:03:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
405:05:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
386:06:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
356:02:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
339:13:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
322:06:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
288:20:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
268:12:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
249:12:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
230:12:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
513:07:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
65:09:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
551:
523:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
204:and the more detailed
79:Big Bite Submarines
71:Big Bite Submarines
431:
397:John Pack Lambert
388:
384:
309:
290:
280:Shawn in Montreal
270:
251:
63:
542:
525:
486:
427:
421:
419:
417:
383:
381:
374:
372:
370:
368:
318:
299:
266:
247:
226:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
550:
549:
545:
544:
543:
541:
540:
539:
538:
532:deletion review
521:
492:
482:
432:
423:
412:
410:
389:
377:
375:
363:
361:
320:
316:
260:
241:
228:
224:
210:User:Necrothesp
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
548:
546:
537:
536:
516:
515:
498:
490:
466:
465:
464:
420:
409:
408:
407:
371:
360:
359:
358:
341:
324:
314:
312:The Bushranger
292:
291:
271:
252:
218:
215:Signpost Op-Ed
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
547:
535:
533:
529:
524:
518:
517:
514:
510:
506:
502:
499:
497:
494:
493:
487:
485:
479:
474:
470:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
450:
449:
445:
441:
437:
434:
433:
430:
426:
425:North America
418:
415:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
390:
387:
382:
380:
369:
366:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
340:
336:
332:
328:
325:
323:
319:
317:One ping only
313:
307:
303:
297:
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
272:
269:
265:
264:
258:
253:
250:
246:
245:
239:
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
221:
216:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
522:
519:
500:
489:
483:
468:
435:
411:
392:
378:
362:
343:
326:
301:
295:
263:CAPTAIN RAJU
262:
244:CAPTAIN RAJU
243:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
164:free images
454:Necrothesp
379:Sandstein
331:Necrothesp
225:reply here
58:Sandstein
528:talk page
37:talk page
530:or in a
414:Relisted
365:Relisted
302:somebody
123:View log
39:or in a
473:must be
348:LibStar
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
505:Michig
469:Delete
440:Rhadow
436:Delete
393:Delete
344:delete
142:Google
100:delete
300:(And
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
509:talk
501:Keep
484:Reyk
478:WP:N
458:talk
444:talk
401:talk
352:talk
335:talk
327:Keep
296:Keep
284:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
491:YO!
192:TWL
121:– (
511:)
460:)
446:)
403:)
354:)
337:)
310:-
286:)
278:.
259:.
240:.
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
52:.
507:(
456:(
442:(
399:(
350:(
333:(
308:)
282:(
222:|
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.