598:, I have added some material to satisfy User:Bearcat's valid point that article needs sourced expansion. But the fact that he has been a popular and successful Mayor means that there is far more sourcing on a range of issues than I have time to wade through. So I will leave this topic, with the hope that someone has the time to make further improvements.
415:#2. Mayors of large cities can still be deleted if they aren't, and mayors of small towns can be kept if they are. But this contains no real evidence of notability at all: there's no real substance here besides a fairly boilerplate "he exists, here's his career background prior to becoming mayor, the end", and two of the three footnotes are
492:
in its own right, and can no longer be a "low-profile individual." A Google news search shows about 1,090 hits for "'Bill Saffo' Wilmington." Using a couple of the top hits, I updated the article to include his electoral victories and included a claim that the subject is now the longest serving mayor
294:
Just for the record, 100K isn't considered a "small town" for our purposes — it's entirely large enough that a properly sourced article about a mayor would be kept. This is still deletable in its current state, but the determining factor is its lack of quality sourcing, not the city's population.
238:
the size of the town is *precisely* the reason I added him to AFD consideration. "Mayors of smaller towns, however, are generally deemed not notable just for being mayors, although they may be notable for other reasons in addition to their mayoralty (e.g. having previously held a more notable
253:
small is a relative term and a subjective to the opinions, experiences, nuances of an individuals circumstances - 100,000 IMHO isnt anywhere near small. I also said there are enough sources/references to make Saffo notable according to
497:: "A primary source may only be used on Knowledge to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge"). --
399:. I'm willing to reconsider this if the article sees improvement before closure, but the inclusion test for a mayor has nothing to do with the city's population — it's a factor of whether or not the mayor can be demonstrated as the
295:
POLOUTCOMES should actually be written for added clarity, because the role of the population test has changed since it was written: it's not the marker between notable and non-notable mayors per se, but comes into play
169:
451:
source for the purposes of demonstrating notability, frequently trying to stack it onto namechecks of the person's existence in coverage of other things and/or content in which the topic was the bylined
493:
of
Wilmington and his previous service on the Council. Primary sources, including government records, should not be discounted, as primary sources can be used to develop an article (see
423:
him. And for an article that's already existed for almost a decade, it's not a good sign if this is all anybody could be arsed to do in that entire time. And it's not enough to just
345:
122:
321:
200:
Mayor of a small city (pop ~100,000). No other notable factors about him. There are thousands of mayors of small towns. I don't think that merits an encyclopedia article.
163:
357:
333:
129:
623:
353:
329:
222:. Also a Cities population isnt relevant to a person notability only whether there are sufficient sources to establish notability.
17:
95:
90:
349:
325:
99:
184:
151:
82:
419:
that cannot support notability at all, while the third glancingly namechecks his existence in an article that isn't
569:
539:
485:
396:
373:
641:
515:
Sure, primary sources can be used for supplementary verification of facts, but they can't be used to demonstrate
40:
416:
381:
275:
218:
10 years in office there a lot of sources relating to the Saffo as mayor yes including bios at electionsmeets
145:
621:
637:
603:
580:
235:
36:
141:
607:
584:
560:
528:
506:
477:
387:
361:
337:
312:
281:
265:
248:
229:
209:
64:
244:
205:
377:
271:
262:
226:
177:
191:
616:
524:
502:
494:
473:
308:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
636:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
599:
240:
201:
86:
456:
of the piece rather than its subject. So we don't keep an article just because somebody
157:
551:
412:
259:
223:
55:
595:
489:
255:
219:
520:
498:
469:
404:
304:
116:
78:
70:
615:
as longest serving mayor in city's history, a fact I just added to the lede.
299:
in the question of evaluating whether the sourcing present in the article is
488:
is a large enough jurisdiction where an independently elected mayor is a
630:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
572:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
542:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
376:, unless the sources that are stated to exist are found. -
112:
108:
104:
460:
that better sources are out there: we keep it if they
176:
468:
whether those other sources are good enough or not.
578:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
548:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
346:
list of North
Carolina-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
644:). No further edits should be made to this page.
322:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
443:, and (b) a lot of Knowledge contributors have
190:
8:
447:wrong-headed ideas about what constitutes a
344:Note: This debate has been included in the
320:Note: This debate has been included in the
270:Then they should be added to the article. -
435:of that, because (a) anybody could simply
343:
319:
258:making the cities population irrelevant.
427:that better sources exist — one has to
594:City is big enough to keep the mayor.
464:the evidence so that we can properly
7:
24:
397:Wilmington, North Carolina#Mayors
374:Wilmington, North Carolina#Mayors
439:that better sources exist about
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
608:13:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
585:04:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
561:06:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
529:18:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
507:17:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
478:17:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
388:06:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
362:02:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
338:02:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
313:17:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
282:06:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
266:08:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
249:04:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
230:01:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
210:00:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
65:08:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
661:
486:Wilmington, North Carolina
633:Please do not modify it.
350:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga
326:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga
32:Please do not modify it.
411:his mayoralty to clear
587:
563:
559:
364:
340:
63:
652:
635:
583:
577:
575:
573:
558:
556:
549:
547:
545:
543:
384:
278:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
660:
659:
655:
654:
653:
651:
650:
649:
648:
642:deletion review
631:
588:
579:
568:
566:
564:
552:
550:
538:
536:
417:primary sources
405:reliable source
386:
382:
280:
276:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
658:
656:
647:
646:
626:
625:
610:
576:
565:
546:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
510:
509:
480:
390:
380:
378:The Bushranger
366:
365:
341:
316:
315:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
274:
272:The Bushranger
236:WP:POLOUTCOMES
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
657:
645:
643:
639:
634:
628:
627:
624:
622:
620:
619:
614:
611:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
589:
586:
582:
581:North America
574:
571:
562:
557:
555:
544:
541:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
513:
512:
511:
508:
504:
500:
496:
491:
490:public figure
487:
484:
481:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
389:
385:
383:One ping only
379:
375:
371:
368:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
342:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
318:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
293:
292:
283:
279:
277:One ping only
273:
269:
268:
267:
264:
261:
257:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
237:
233:
232:
231:
228:
225:
221:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
632:
629:
618:TimTempleton
617:
612:
591:
567:
553:
537:
516:
482:
465:
461:
457:
453:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
408:
400:
392:
369:
300:
296:
215:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
600:E.M.Gregory
348:. Regards,
324:. Regards,
164:free images
554:Sandstein
517:notability
495:WP:Primary
403:of enough
241:MartinezMD
239:office)."
202:MartinezMD
79:Bill Saffo
71:Bill Saffo
58:Sandstein
638:talk page
613:Weak keep
445:extremely
407:coverage
37:talk page
640:or in a
570:Relisted
540:Relisted
519:per se.
466:evaluate
441:anything
433:evidence
393:Redirect
370:Redirect
303:or not.
123:View log
39:or in a
521:Bearcat
499:Enos733
470:Bearcat
413:WP:NPOL
401:subject
305:Bearcat
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
596:WP:HEY
454:author
301:enough
256:WP:GNG
220:WP:GNG
142:Google
100:delete
421:about
409:about
263:garra
227:garra
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
604:talk
592:Keep
525:talk
503:talk
483:Keep
474:talk
462:show
458:says
449:good
431:the
429:show
358:mail
354:talk
334:mail
330:talk
309:talk
297:only
260:Gnan
245:talk
234:FYI
224:Gnan
216:Keep
206:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
437:say
425:say
395:to
372:to
192:TWL
121:– (
606:)
527:)
505:)
476:)
360:)
356:•
336:)
332:•
311:)
247:)
208:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
52:.
602:(
523:(
501:(
472:(
352:(
328:(
307:(
243:(
204:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.