167:, exclusive running is also listed as the first requirement. At the end of the day, looking at these documents, and all the other systems in the UK, the exclusive running requirement looks to be mandatory, as all other features more or less can be seen on normal bus systems around the country, which are never refered to as rapid transit. Coupled with the fact as someone already pointed out, googling bus rapid transit and cardiff produces zero results, as opposed to
422:
and rewrite. The intention was to create a bus rapid transit system of sorts but in reality this has not happened due to opposition from residents of the streets where bus lanes were to be introduced. Plus, for other reasons mentioned like the design of the buses and ticketing, the premise of the
217:
reveals no relevant information. Many of the hits are either mirrors or coincidences (i.e. pages that happen to contain "Cardiff" and "bus rapid transit"). If not even Google can find reference to Bus Rapid
Transit in Cardiff, on the balance of probabilities it probably isn't there -
258:- this is one of the few non-negotiables policies we have. The lack of any relevant results on Google for what would in theory be a fairly massive project initiated within the last 10 years is a fairly sure sign that the article represents
390:
is pretty light on bus information and could probably be better used as a starting point for a general article of that nature. With the BRT references removed, the current content would be better situated in
343:
125:
144::So how or what many BRT features are needed to be classed as a BRT system? If this is the case, I can see other BRT systems that do not necessarily meet the criteria such as the one in Swansea
214:
124:
Premise for the article is innacurate, the system in
Cardiff while having some BRT features in common with many towns in the UK, it is not a BRT system compared to those in the
117:
90:
85:
94:
324:. There is little opinion above about whether the article can be kept or has to be deleted. Is a change of name and some editing a possible course of action? --
77:
192:
237:
This is
Knowledge, not Google. Can you then explain what features of the Swansea or Gateshead/Metro Centre systems make them BRT that Cardiff doesn't have?
48:
actually no valid arguments were made on either side. (Default keep). AfD is the wrong venue to discuss article content or proper article name.
263:
223:
81:
280:
Swansea uses FTR vehicles, off bus ticketing, traffic signal priority, and 'stations'. Gateshead uses a busway (not a bus lane).
17:
432:
404:
380:
359:
333:
313:
289:
271:
246:
231:
207:
180:
153:
136:
59:
347:
73:
65:
163:
from brt.org, under "brt should have", off highway running (i.e. busway), optionally guided, is listed first. In this
55:
168:
447:
242:
149:
36:
446:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
267:
227:
350:
would last too long without someone putting it up for deletion, not that I would object to it's existence.
368:
419:
400:
387:
355:
285:
238:
176:
145:
132:
423:
title Bus Rapid
Transit in Cardiff would be confusing since it does not currently exist in reality.
424:
428:
201:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
396:
376:
351:
329:
309:
281:
172:
128:
346:. I maintain the title and content is factually incorrect. I don't think a rename to say
342:, as the article only came into existence after an opposed attempt to include cardiff in
160:
259:
111:
299:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
392:
255:
372:
325:
305:
50:
164:
440:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
344:
List of guided busways and BRT systems in the United
Kingdom
126:
List of guided busways and BRT systems in the United
Kingdom
107:
103:
99:
304:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
450:). No further edits should be made to this page.
367:. But what about something more general such as
8:
193:list of Wales-related deletion discussions
191:: This debate has been included in the
7:
348:High quality bus routes in Cardiff
24:
254:Information on Knowledge must be
371:and then expand and rewrite? --
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
433:22:00, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
405:22:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
381:21:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
360:14:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
334:10:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
314:10:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
290:14:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
272:18:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
247:23:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
74:Bus Rapid Transit in Cardiff
66:Bus Rapid Transit in Cardiff
60:22:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
232:20:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
208:04:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
181:20:52, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
154:19:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
137:16:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
467:
443:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
420:Transport in Cardiff
388:Transport in Cardiff
159:According to this
316:
210:
205:
196:
458:
445:
369:Buses in Cardiff
303:
301:
213:A little bit of
199:
198:—User:Ceyockey (
197:
187:
115:
97:
34:
466:
465:
461:
460:
459:
457:
456:
455:
454:
448:deletion review
441:
297:
260:novel synthesis
239:Welshleprechaun
146:Welshleprechaun
88:
72:
69:
58:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
464:
462:
453:
452:
436:
435:
408:
407:
384:
383:
362:
336:
318:
317:
302:
294:
293:
292:
277:
276:
275:
274:
235:
234:
211:
184:
183:
122:
121:
68:
63:
54:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
463:
451:
449:
444:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
421:
417:
413:
410:
409:
406:
402:
398:
394:
389:
386:
385:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
319:
315:
311:
307:
300:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
273:
269:
265:
264:90.203.45.168
261:
257:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
233:
229:
225:
224:90.203.45.168
221:
216:
212:
209:
204:
203:
194:
190:
186:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
157:
156:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
134:
130:
127:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
442:
439:
415:
411:
364:
339:
338:On balance,
321:
298:
236:
219:
200:
188:
141:
140:
123:
49:
46:No consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
393:Cardiff Bus
397:MickMacNee
352:MickMacNee
282:MickMacNee
256:verifiable
202:talk to me
173:MickMacNee
165:fact sheet
129:MickMacNee
215:searching
425:Tommy874
416:Redirect
161:brochure
118:View log
56:contribs
365:Comment
322:Comment
169:Swansea
142:Comment
91:protect
86:history
412:Delete
340:Delete
220:Delete
95:delete
373:Bduke
326:Bduke
306:Bduke
112:views
104:watch
100:links
51:JERRY
16:<
429:talk
401:talk
377:talk
356:talk
330:talk
310:talk
286:talk
268:talk
243:talk
228:talk
189:Note
177:talk
150:talk
133:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
418:to
414:or
262:.
222:.
195:.
116:– (
431:)
403:)
395:.
379:)
358:)
332:)
312:)
288:)
270:)
245:)
230:)
206:)
179:)
171:.
152:)
135:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
427:(
399:(
375:(
354:(
328:(
308:(
284:(
266:(
241:(
226:(
175:(
148:(
131:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.