366:; the next step should include efforts both to improve what is here and to identify on the talk page what is extraneous and why. The apparent informality of the job description is an unusual barrier to easy research, and that means the article should be presumed well worth the extra effort it may take to do it right, until enuf has been done right to demonstrate deletion-worthiness. A fair chance at improvement can exist only after the underbrush has been cleared away to expose fertile ground.
387:
This is a widely used term but without a blue-link the meaning may be unclear to some people (or dismissed as a typo), the article has over 3000 reads in the last 30 days, so it is serving some purpose. It also has somewhere between 50 and 100 incoming links from the article space, so there is plenty
168:
207:
added on the end (including various TV shows that happen to have included the term). In 10 years, this is all we have managed to come up with; it suggests to me that this article could never pass
121:
293:
If kept, what is the article supposed to discuss so it is more than just a dictionary definition and dumping-ground for trivia? And where would you merge it to? —
162:
343:
job titles are likely or unlikely to "hide" the gofers behind them, and what degree of advancement such positions are likely to offer. (Should we believe
355:
reflect employees of low status actually being less dispensable than the bosses? Can we establish a list of captains of industry who "started out in the
60:
499:
Well known phenomenon., and merits an articles. There should be a wide range of additional sources. The meaning is not quite the same as " courier".
393:
416:
as it's essentially the same thing, and we don't need two articles on the same thing, but since errand boy redirects there, so should this. --
339:
to discard any truly unhelpful material, find reliable sources, and seek help from experts on e.g. workforce structure who can tell us what
301:
219:
128:
17:
295:
213:
56:
183:
434:
482:. It's a valid search term, and maybe could be an article some day, but for now a redirect makes the most sense.
150:
529:
284:
94:
89:
40:
98:
52:
389:
332:
81:
461:- seems to be just a dictionary definition, followed by some disconnected trivia about the word defined.
388:
of ammo to improve the article in "What links here". IMHO This is a simple refimprove and quite possibly
525:
487:
344:
36:
144:
280:
271:. They are all blue links and so should this be too. Deletion is therefore not appropriate and an
176:
140:
276:
268:
241:
322:
only be timely once there is evidence that a adequately focused improvement effort has been made
510:
491:
470:
451:
425:
400:
308:
288:
247:
226:
63:
236:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
524:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
190:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
483:
421:
200:
373:
204:
351:
a species of Gofer, and if so, can we document how much reality the film reflects? Does
327:-- A decade is but a blink of the Wikipedic eye --IMVisionaryO-- , since WP is the (per
506:
466:
352:
272:
208:
445:
348:
264:
156:
115:
417:
413:
397:
369:
260:
85:
356:
255:
This is an obvious search term for a variety of possible targets including
501:
462:
479:
409:
328:
256:
77:
69:
518:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
437:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
359:"?) IMO, deletion would be grossly premature at this poin
111:
107:
103:
175:
443:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
532:). No further edits should be made to this page.
331:, eventually-to-be-long-forgotten?) seed of the
189:
8:
320:to a future deletion proposal that can
392:. I see no reason to delete this. --
7:
24:
199:This article reads mostly like a
412:. I would have said redirect to
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
511:04:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
492:18:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
471:05:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
452:21:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
426:10:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
401:23:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
309:06:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
289:23:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
248:01:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
227:00:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
64:08:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
549:
347:is realistic? Is Tess in
521:Please do not modify it.
380:, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
318:Keep, without prejudice
333:Encyclopedia Galactica
275:is preferable per our
345:The Devil Wears Prada
201:dictionary definition
53:CambridgeBayWeather
269:personal assistant
203:, with a bunch of
454:
338:
305:
223:
540:
523:
448:
442:
440:
438:
390:WP:WORDISSUBJECT
324:
307:
303:
298:
244:
242:
225:
221:
216:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
34:
548:
547:
543:
542:
541:
539:
538:
537:
536:
530:deletion review
519:
455:
446:
433:
431:
300:
294:
218:
212:
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
546:
544:
535:
534:
514:
513:
494:
473:
441:
430:
429:
428:
403:
382:
381:
367:
314:
313:
312:
311:
277:editing policy
250:
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
57:Uqaqtuq (talk)
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
545:
533:
531:
527:
522:
516:
515:
512:
508:
504:
503:
498:
495:
493:
489:
485:
481:
477:
474:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
456:
453:
450:
449:
439:
436:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
404:
402:
399:
395:
391:
386:
383:
379:
375:
371:
365:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
336:
334:
330:
323:
319:
316:
315:
310:
306:
297:
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
251:
249:
246:
245:
243:Esquivalience
238:
234:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
215:
210:
206:
205:random trivia
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
58:
54:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
520:
517:
500:
496:
475:
458:
444:
432:
405:
384:
377:
363:
360:
349:Working Girl
340:
326:
321:
317:
265:aide de camp
252:
240:
232:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
49:
47:
31:
28:
484:Chunky Rice
394:Paid Editor
273:alternative
163:free images
414:Errand boy
398:User:009o9
296:This, that
261:errand boy
253:Keep/merge
237:WP:NOTDICT
214:This, that
61:Sunasuttuq
526:talk page
378:& :47
357:mail room
302:the other
281:Andrew D.
220:the other
37:talk page
528:or in a
476:Redirect
435:Relisted
406:Redirect
122:View log
39:or in a
480:courier
447:MBisanz
410:Courier
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
459:Delete
418:Michig
376:08:40
353:9 to 5
341:formal
329:Asimov
304:(talk)
257:gopher
233:Delete
222:(talk)
209:WP:GNG
141:Google
99:delete
507:talk
497:Keep.
370:Jerzy
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
78:Gofer
70:Gofer
16:<
488:talk
467:talk
422:talk
385:Keep
335:. --
299:and
285:talk
235:per
217:and
211:. —
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
50:Keep
502:DGG
478:to
463:SJK
408:to
396:--
191:TWL
120:– (
509:)
490:)
469:)
424:)
368:--
287:)
279:.
267:,
263:,
259:,
239:.
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
59:,
55:,
505:(
486:(
465:(
420:(
374:t
372:•
364:t
361:g
337:)
325:(
283:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.