375:
Being a good article has nothing to do with notability. In fact it suggests that what we see is what we get (i.e. there are unlikely to be any more good sources out there to demonstrate GNG). How long it has been here is irrelevant, but it has been tagged with a notability and reliable sources tag
358:- the article is listed as a good article, and hasn't hurt anyone for ~6 years. Both of these create a presumption for inclusion, and I haven't seen anything to rebut that presumption. Being a single from a significant artist is also strongly in the article's favor. Passes WP:GNG.
161:
338:
216:
376:
for nearly two years so I am not the first to question its notability. Can you show a reliable source that gives significant independent coverage of the single (requirement of
114:
155:
52:. Its well established that a good article still needs to meet inclusion standards and in this case the demolition of the sourcing has not been refuted,
305:
480:
275:
121:
251:
245:
17:
269:
562:
87:
82:
176:
91:
143:
293:
548:
419:
582:
396:. That is weak at the best of time, but especially as some of those singles should probably be deleted as well.
359:
224:
74:
40:
311:
558:
137:
578:
36:
263:
384:. I have gone through all the independent sources in the article and not found anything. It fails the
220:
133:
239:
565:
533:
515:
494:
466:
440:
408:
389:
366:
347:
342:
329:
228:
208:
169:
78:
56:
287:
183:
491:
405:
326:
205:
70:
62:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
577:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
193:
529:
511:
476:
462:
385:
381:
299:
192:
Tagged for notability for over a year. Charted 193 in South Korea so doesn't really meet
281:
431:
475:
Can you please have a closer look at those refs. The number is less than you think as
149:
393:
377:
483:
397:
318:
257:
197:
53:
108:
525:
507:
458:
479:
and most of the others consist of a sentence or two. The best ref is an
453:, we're just into the realms of what constitutes significant coverage,
296:
Album review - (see "Good Hit") used when describing generic songs
272:
Album review with small mention of Good Hit alongside other songs
573:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
455:
there are a large number of weak refs leading me to a weak keep
390:
We don't presumed every significant artists singles are notable
551:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
422:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
317:
Standard coverage for any song released by any major artist.
104:
100:
96:
477:
album reviews don't count towards a singles notability
168:
339:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
290:
Album review - "Inaptly named Good Hit" only mention.
217:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
557:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ā
428:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
308:
About another song - Good Hit gets a short sentence
260:Album review with Good hit mentioned by name only.
394:that the other singles on the record have singles
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
585:). No further edits should be made to this page.
337:Note: This discussion has been included in the
215:Note: This discussion has been included in the
278:Probably best source. Paragraph about the song.
254:RS? Tiny article saying video has been released
248:Tiny article saying that new single has arrived
242:Tiny article saying that new single coming soon
506:the refs are a bit weaker than at first look.
392:. The only argument I can think of to keep is
266:Tiny article offering "sneak peak" at Good Hit
182:
8:
314:Apparantly ]she is "super hot" in the video
336:
214:
7:
499:I've had another look and switch to
284:Album review - 2 sentences on song
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
520:On third reflection, now a
602:
409:18:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
367:14:28, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
348:12:46, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
330:09:20, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
229:08:52, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
209:07:54, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
57:15:16, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
566:13:05, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
534:11:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
516:11:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
495:10:46, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
467:10:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
441:09:38, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
382:Album reviews don't count
575:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
388:so must rely on GNG.
362:ā” Šl Cid of įŗalencia
568:
443:
439:
350:
231:
593:
556:
554:
552:
438:
436:
429:
427:
425:
423:
364:
345:
187:
186:
172:
124:
112:
94:
34:
601:
600:
596:
595:
594:
592:
591:
590:
589:
583:deletion review
569:
547:
545:
444:
432:
430:
418:
416:
360:
343:
221:The Mighty Glen
129:
120:
85:
69:
66:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
599:
597:
588:
587:
555:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
470:
469:
426:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
370:
369:
352:
351:
333:
332:
315:
309:
303:
297:
291:
285:
279:
273:
267:
261:
255:
249:
243:
233:
232:
190:
189:
126:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
598:
586:
584:
580:
576:
571:
570:
567:
564:
560:
553:
550:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:
517:
513:
509:
505:
503:
498:
497:
496:
493:
490:
489:
488:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
471:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
450:
446:
445:
442:
437:
435:
424:
421:
410:
407:
404:
403:
402:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
374:
373:
372:
371:
368:
365:
363:
357:
354:
353:
349:
346:
340:
335:
334:
331:
328:
325:
324:
323:
316:
313:
310:
307:
304:
302:Same as above
301:
298:
295:
292:
289:
286:
283:
280:
277:
274:
271:
268:
265:
262:
259:
256:
253:
250:
247:
244:
241:
238:
237:
236:
230:
226:
222:
218:
213:
212:
211:
210:
207:
204:
203:
202:
195:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
123:
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
574:
572:
546:
521:
501:
500:
486:
485:
454:
448:
447:
433:
417:
400:
399:
361:
355:
321:
320:
234:
200:
199:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
117:
49:
47:
31:
28:
356:Strong Keep
312:MTV Romania
294:Digital Spy
156:free images
434:Sandstein
276:Buzzworthy
235:Ref check
579:talk page
449:Weak keep
270:Billboard
252:Softpedia
194:WP:NSONGS
37:talk page
581:or in a
549:Relisted
481:MTV blog
420:Relisted
344:MT Train
306:LA times
282:Popcrush
258:Allmusic
115:View log
71:Good Hit
63:Good Hit
39:or in a
502:neutral
451:Neutral
300:AV club
162:WPĀ refs
150:scholar
88:protect
83:history
54:Spartaz
563:(talk)
522:delete
492:(talk)
406:(talk)
386:WP:SNG
378:WP:GNG
327:(talk)
264:Rap up
246:Latina
240:defpen
206:(talk)
134:Google
92:delete
50:delete
526:Szzuk
508:Szzuk
459:Szzuk
288:Slant
177:JSTOR
138:books
122:Stats
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
530:talk
512:talk
487:corn
463:talk
401:corn
322:corn
225:talk
201:corn
170:FENS
144:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
559:PMC
484:AIR
398:AIR
380:)?
319:AIR
198:AIR
184:TWL
113:ā (
561:ā
532:)
524:.
514:)
504:,
465:)
457:.
341:.
227:)
219:.
196:.
164:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
528:(
510:(
461:(
223:(
188:)
180:Ā·
174:Ā·
166:Ā·
159:Ā·
153:Ā·
147:Ā·
141:Ā·
136:(
128:(
125:)
118:Ā·
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.