258:, especially considering it just launched. Sourcing is not sufficient - first source cited is a short review from a magazine club that promotes new magazines (ie quite a narrow audience), and the second is a one-man blog about graphic design in football (again, narrow audience, and hardly a reliable indicator of notability). The other two articles are about
364:
None of the sources you added are sufficient to support a claim of notability. All of them are are trivial mentions in articles about other subjects. Kyle Harman-Turner's website is not reliable for a claim of notability, because he works for them. I'm sorry, but this is why I think new editors
216:
463:
that Gaffer interviewed them. None of the sources you provide support a claim to notability under the GNG, and nothing you've shown indicates that Gaffer meets any of the bullet points of NPERIODICAL. ♠
455:
If you had read and understood the GNG, you would understand why simply being mentioned is not significant/in-depth coverage. Significant coverage that meets GNG would be an article that's
427:
409:
365:
should not be starting out creating new articles right off the bat - you need to get familiar with our sourcing and notability guidelines first. Please start with the two I linked above -
210:
289:
433:
308:
169:
327:
402:
it reads more like a guideline for academic periodicals than sports or cultural magazine. The magazine has been quoted by other reliable media like The
Guardian
116:
424:
101:
403:
421:
430:
248:
176:
142:
137:
412:
146:
436:
398:, the sources (except the Kyle Harman-Turner's website) are "Significant coverage", "Reliable" and also "Independent of the subject". For
129:
231:
198:
96:
89:
17:
418:
415:
487:
per nomination. None of the references demonstrate that the magazine is notable in its own right. At best, it's a case of
406:
468:
382:
335:
316:
297:
278:
192:
439:
110:
106:
66:
188:
538:
40:
521:
517:
500:
471:
450:
385:
355:
338:
319:
300:
281:
71:
238:
464:
378:
331:
312:
293:
274:
133:
534:
441:
and many more if you search on Google. Why would these media quote the magazine if it were not notable?
399:
370:
255:
36:
125:
77:
346:
I have improved the article. Could you please check if it now meets the required guidelines? Regards,
513:
446:
351:
224:
204:
496:
259:
488:
390:
Thank you for the guideline links. I have already read these and I still believe it meets the
85:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
533:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
509:
62:
442:
347:
492:
395:
391:
366:
270:
374:
163:
53:
269:
On a search, I found nothing more to indicate that this magazine would meet
508:
per nomination. Zero material RS for notability/nothing remotely meeting
459:
Gaffer as a magazine, not an article about some other person that
529:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
251:
for some of the background on the creation of this article.
159:
155:
151:
223:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
541:). No further edits should be made to this page.
326:Note: This discussion has been included in the
307:Note: This discussion has been included in the
288:Note: This discussion has been included in the
290:list of Journalism-related deletion discussions
309:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
237:
8:
328:list of England-related deletion discussions
117:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
325:
306:
287:
266:. It's hardly indicative of notability.
249:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/GAFFER
262:and briefly mention him appearing in
7:
24:
102:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
396:general notability guideline
392:general notability guideline
367:general notability guideline
273:or the SNG for magazines. ♠
254:Zero indication this meets
92:(AfD)? Read these primers!
558:
400:notability for periodicals
371:notability for periodicals
522:18:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
420:, Manchester Evening News
72:20:11, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
531:Please do not modify it.
501:10:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
472:18:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
451:18:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
426:, Yorkshire Evening Post
386:19:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
356:17:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
339:21:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
320:21:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
301:21:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
282:21:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
90:Articles for deletion
417:, Evening Standard
260:Callum Hudson-Odoi
435:, Hull Daily Mail
408:, The Independent
341:
322:
303:
126:Gaffer (magazine)
107:Guide to deletion
97:How to contribute
78:Gaffer (magazine)
549:
429:, Liverpool Echo
375:reliable sources
373:, and look over
242:
241:
227:
179:
167:
149:
87:
58:
34:
557:
556:
552:
551:
550:
548:
547:
546:
545:
539:deletion review
184:
175:
140:
124:
121:
84:
81:
70:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
555:
553:
544:
543:
525:
524:
514:Britishfinance
503:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
414:, The Athletic
359:
358:
343:
342:
323:
304:
256:WP:NPERIODICAL
245:
244:
181:
120:
119:
114:
104:
99:
82:
80:
75:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
554:
542:
540:
536:
532:
527:
526:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
504:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
483:
482:
473:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:
452:
448:
444:
440:
437:
434:
431:
428:
425:
422:
419:
416:
413:
410:
407:
404:
401:
397:
393:
389:
388:
387:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
363:
362:
361:
360:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:
340:
337:
333:
329:
324:
321:
318:
314:
310:
305:
302:
299:
295:
291:
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
276:
272:
267:
265:
261:
257:
252:
250:
240:
236:
233:
230:
226:
222:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
190:
187:
186:Find sources:
182:
178:
174:
171:
165:
161:
157:
153:
148:
144:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:
118:
115:
112:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
93:
91:
86:
79:
76:
74:
73:
68:
64:
59:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
530:
528:
505:
484:
460:
456:
432:, Sky Sports
405:, The Mirror
268:
263:
253:
246:
234:
228:
220:
213:
207:
201:
195:
185:
172:
83:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
423:, The Metro
211:free images
67:revolutions
493:~dom Kaos~
489:WP:TOOSOON
377:as well. ♠
535:talk page
510:WP:SIGCOV
443:Serankail
438:, The Sun
348:Serankail
247:See also
37:talk page
537:or in a
461:mentions
170:View log
111:glossary
39:or in a
411:, Vogue
217:WP refs
205:scholar
143:protect
138:history
88:New to
63:spin me
506:Delete
485:Delete
469:(talk)
394:. For
383:(talk)
336:(talk)
317:(talk)
298:(talk)
279:(talk)
271:WP:GNG
264:Gaffer
189:Google
147:delete
50:delete
457:about
232:JSTOR
193:books
177:Stats
164:views
156:watch
152:links
56:78.26
16:<
518:talk
497:talk
447:talk
369:and
352:talk
225:FENS
199:news
160:logs
134:talk
130:edit
465:PMC
379:PMC
332:PMC
330:. ♠
313:PMC
311:. ♠
294:PMC
292:. ♠
275:PMC
239:TWL
168:– (
520:)
512:.
499:)
491:.
467:♠
449:)
381:♠
354:)
334:♠
315:♠
296:♠
277:♠
219:)
162:|
158:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
65:/
52:.
516:(
495:(
445:(
350:(
243:)
235:·
229:·
221:·
214:·
208:·
202:·
196:·
191:(
183:(
180:)
173:·
166:)
128:(
113:)
109:(
69:)
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.