Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Gamergate controversy - Knowledge

Source 📝

217:
of biographic articles, isn´t consistent if it describes the gamergate movement or the controversy of accusations to members of said movement and generally is written very subjectively. Due to the controversity and unverificablity of accusations to the movement and the constant misuse of the article
166: 197:
Hashtag campaigns aren´t significant enought to warrant an article, the article itself is very subjective, repeats itself alot, uses emotionally loaded language, treats unverified and/or
218:
as a political battleground by activists, there isn´t really any hope that this article would stay decent even if somebody managed to somehow get this mess of an article in control.
160: 119: 92: 87: 96: 126: 79: 181: 148: 17: 209:, uses loaded quotes from random people who have no relevance to the subject or the sentence in any way, infringes the 142: 227: 61: 83: 138: 245: 40: 188: 241: 223: 210: 75: 67: 36: 219: 202: 174: 154: 214: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
240:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
201:
claims as self-evident, uses biased sources using loaded language themselves, infringes
206: 113: 198: 53: 234:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109: 105: 101: 173: 52:. Editor cannot nominate article per restrictions. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 248:). No further edits should be made to this page. 187: 8: 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 228:17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 62:17:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 265: 237:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 76:Gamergate controversy 68:Gamergate controversy 215:accusation guideline 256: 239: 192: 191: 177: 129: 117: 99: 58: 34: 264: 263: 259: 258: 257: 255: 254: 253: 252: 246:deletion review 235: 134: 125: 90: 74: 71: 56: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 262: 260: 251: 250: 195: 194: 131: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 261: 249: 247: 243: 238: 232: 231: 230: 229: 225: 221: 216: 212: 211:victimisation 208: 204: 203:WP:NOTSCANDAL 200: 199:unverifieable 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 132: 128: 124: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 60: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 236: 233: 196: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 122: 54: 49: 47: 31: 28: 220:Popcor11235 161:free images 50:speedy keep 242:talk page 37:talk page 244:or in a 120:View log 39:or in a 207:WP:SOAP 167:WP refs 155:scholar 93:protect 88:history 139:Google 97:delete 182:JSTOR 143:books 127:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 16:< 224:talk 213:and 205:and 175:FENS 149:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 55:Neil 189:TWL 118:– ( 226:) 169:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 222:( 193:) 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 133:( 130:) 123:· 116:) 78:( 57:N

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
NeilN
17:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Gamergate controversy
Gamergate controversy
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
unverifieable
WP:NOTSCANDAL
WP:SOAP

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.