522:
while I recognize that we should consider WP:ATD when possible, I don't think this would be it. This sort of re-direct invites creating re-direct for every retail outlet, organization etc into "organizations in abc, companies in abc, collective in abc". In some cases, deletion is more appropriate and
206:
441:. There are lots and lots of event venues in the world and overwhelming majority of them are not notable. Existence is not notability. Freedom Press has been discussed at least once.
200:
270:
332:
standards. The
Freedom News source is a very good question, because that was the only source that wrote directly about the Glasgow Autonomous Space. As I noticed, it has a
163:
336:
of its own, but it is a website and biannual paper with a circulation of about 1,000. On the other hand, it's a very long-established newspaper, dating all the way back to
442:
483:
309:
In any case, I've searched quite exhaustively, and can find no other significant sources. If deletion is the right choice given the sources available now, so be it.
278:
274:
136:
131:
388:
Ah, so you think the
Glasgow Times article fails notability? (I'm not trying to save this article, just want to get a better understanding for the future)
140:
110:
95:
123:
459:
I wish self-organized spaces were run of the mill! I accept that it fails notability now, however. Thanks for bringing my attention to the essay.
266:
221:
188:
90:
83:
17:
328:
Thank you, Douginamug, I hate that sinking feeling when a subject that I personally find interesting proves not to meet the
182:
127:
553:
532:
510:
470:
454:
426:
422:
399:
379:
375:
353:
323:
290:
258:
65:
443:
Knowledge:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_223#Are_left-anarchist_sources_reliable_for_an_article_on_such_a_group?
333:
167:
104:
100:
178:
59:
570:
40:
228:
119:
71:
418:
385:
371:
52:
and there is a valid argument against the redirect, so I have not done so despite it being a potential AtD
349:
254:
566:
54:
36:
194:
465:
394:
329:
318:
528:
450:
286:
214:
302:
As I published, I was aware that notability might be an issue, but chose to be bold. Although the
549:
367:
306:
source seems to provide significant coverage, I presume it fails in reliability or independence?
345:
299:
250:
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
565:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
445:
The narrower the intended audience, the less relevant something is for general notability.
242:
460:
389:
341:
337:
313:
340:. I would invite others to opine as to whether that is enough to meet the standards of
524:
504:
446:
438:
434:
282:
545:
491:
487:
414:
246:
499:
495:
238:
157:
362:
is a significant source, there's still the matter that this would be the
366:
significant source, failing the significant coverage requirement in
237:
While this centre does many laudable things, I could only find one
561:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
153:
149:
145:
213:
484:Self-managed social centres in the United Kingdom
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
573:). No further edits should be made to this page.
265:Note: This discussion has been included in the
312:Thanks for keeping wikipedia encyclopedic! :)
249:, not enough to support a claim of notability
227:
8:
111:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
264:
7:
24:
269:lists for the following topics:
96:Introduction to deletion process
486:, where it is mentioned, as an
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
358:I think even in the case that
1:
554:16:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
533:01:43, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
511:00:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
471:12:13, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
455:17:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
427:03:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
400:12:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
380:03:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
354:19:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
324:14:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
291:09:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
259:03:25, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
66:03:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
523:this would be one of them.
86:(AfD)? Read these primers!
590:
413:As discussed above, fails
563:Please do not modify it.
120:Glasgow Autonomous Space
72:Glasgow Autonomous Space
32:Please do not modify it.
488:alternative to deletion
241:that gave the subject
168:edits since nomination
84:Articles for deletion
492:significant coverage
243:significant coverage
500:independent sources
419:Belichickoverbrady
386:Belichickoverbrady
372:Belichickoverbrady
437:venue that fails
334:wikipedia article
293:
101:Guide to deletion
91:How to contribute
581:
509:
507:
468:
397:
321:
267:deletion sorting
232:
231:
217:
161:
143:
81:
64:
62:
57:
34:
589:
588:
584:
583:
582:
580:
579:
578:
577:
571:deletion review
505:
503:
466:
435:Run of the mill
395:
338:Peter Kropotkin
319:
239:reliable source
174:
134:
118:
115:
78:
75:
60:
55:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
587:
585:
576:
575:
557:
556:
538:
537:
536:
535:
514:
513:
476:
475:
474:
473:
429:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
310:
307:
295:
294:
235:
234:
171:
114:
113:
108:
98:
93:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
586:
574:
572:
568:
564:
559:
558:
555:
551:
547:
543:
540:
539:
534:
530:
526:
521:
518:
517:
516:
515:
512:
508:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
478:
477:
472:
469:
464:
463:
458:
457:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
430:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
409:
401:
398:
393:
392:
387:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
325:
322:
317:
316:
311:
308:
305:
301:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:Organizations
268:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:Glasgow Times
244:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
169:
165:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
138:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
85:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
562:
560:
544:per Czar. --
541:
519:
494:in multiple
479:
461:
431:
410:
390:
363:
360:Freedom News
359:
346:Fiachra10003
314:
304:Freedom News
303:
300:Fiachra10003
251:Fiachra10003
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
77:
49:
47:
31:
28:
368:WP:ORGCRITE
201:free images
61:Mississippi
462:DougInAMug
391:DougInAMug
330:notability
315:DougInAMug
567:talk page
525:Graywalls
447:Graywalls
283:Shellwood
37:talk page
569:or in a
546:Grnrchst
542:Redirect
496:reliable
490:. Lacks
480:Redirect
342:WP:NCORP
279:Scotland
275:Politics
164:View log
105:glossary
39:or in a
520:comment
439:WP:NORG
277:, and
207:WP refs
195:scholar
137:protect
132:history
82:New to
432:Delete
415:WP:GNG
411:Delete
245:, the
179:Google
141:delete
50:delete
222:JSTOR
183:books
158:views
150:watch
146:links
16:<
550:talk
529:talk
506:czar
467:talk
451:talk
423:talk
396:talk
376:talk
364:only
350:talk
320:talk
287:talk
255:talk
215:FENS
189:news
154:logs
128:talk
124:edit
56:Star
482:to
229:TWL
162:– (
552:)
531:)
502:.
498:,
453:)
425:)
417:.
378:)
370:.
352:)
344:.
289:)
281:.
273:,
257:)
209:)
166:|
156:|
152:|
148:|
144:|
139:|
135:|
130:|
126:|
548:(
527:(
449:(
421:(
384:@
374:(
348:(
298:@
285:(
253:(
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
160:)
122:(
107:)
103:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.