261:
258:
339:
I would change my !vote to a keep if there were acceptable sources and a genuine intention to deal with the issues of the article. Reverting to a version from August 2009, which has multiple issues and a circular ref tag that points back to the very same article, does not encourage optimism. What do
375:
caste, I will happily withdraw the deletion nomination. I just think that if the only thing we can reliably says is, "Group X exists", then we shouldn't have an article on it; instead, we should just include it in a list or in prose somewhere else in another article.
195:
This article has not now nor has it had reliable sources for quite a long time. The group may exist, but existence is not sufficient to have an article. I can't find anything other than passing references--certainly not enough for an article.
366:
all spring to mind (not in the sense that they are in any way similar, but in the sense that they are obviously very important books/traditions in the history of the world (in very different ways), but that none of them meet
Knowledge's
214::for lack of reliable sources. I've googled for some too, but find nothing. It's also rather disruptive to have reversions to 3-year-old versions that bear 4-year-old cleanup tags that have already been cleaned up once before. --
164:
371:. And in relation to what Stfg says, if anyone can actually provide enough information from reliable sources to write even a 3 line stub that shows why this group is independently notable from the greater
323:, too, for deletion. How can it be considered an important book if it has stuff on non-notable social groups? Anyway, I'm, all right even if the consensus is in favour of deletion.-
119:
158:
232:
124:
92:
87:
96:
354:
In reference to the above point form
Ravichandar84, the fact that something has a Knowledge article does not make it a reliable source.
319:
269:
79:
179:
17:
146:
299:: What do those sources say? If all they are is the Gurrakhul being in a list of other clans, that's not enough to satisfy
435:
303:. And Thurston is somewhere near the opposite of a reliable source for caste matters (heck, for almost anything).
140:
481:
40:
462:
441:
410:
385:
349:
334:
312:
287:
246:
223:
205:
61:
136:
329:
282:
83:
274:
186:
477:
57:
36:
75:
67:
406:
454:
458:
172:
381:
324:
308:
277:
201:
152:
242:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
476:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
420:
53:
402:
345:
264:
219:
377:
304:
300:
197:
368:
238:
113:
340:
the other sources say? What are the prospects for genuine article improvement? --
363:
355:
423:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
257:
There are certainly reliable sources on the subject notable among them being
341:
215:
372:
276:. Nevertheless, I do agree that the article requires some cleaning up.-
359:
470:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
171:
430:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
484:). No further edits should be made to this page.
233:list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions
185:
8:
231:Note: This debate has been included in the
263:. There is also a detailed description in
230:
317:Well, in that case, you ought to tag
7:
453:only one mention in google scholar.
320:Castes and Tribes of Southern India
270:Castes and Tribes of Southern India
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
463:18:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
442:09:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
411:10:39, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
386:12:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
62:11:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
350:09:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
335:08:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
313:15:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
288:14:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
247:13:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
224:08:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
206:05:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
501:
369:reliable source guidelines
473:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
401:serious WP:GNG failure
48:The result was
444:
249:
236:
76:Gurukkal brahmins
68:Gurukkal brahmins
492:
475:
438:
432:CharlieEchoTango
429:
425:
327:
280:
237:
190:
189:
175:
127:
117:
99:
34:
500:
499:
495:
494:
493:
491:
490:
489:
488:
482:deletion review
471:
436:
418:
332:
325:
285:
278:
132:
123:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
498:
496:
487:
486:
466:
465:
447:
446:
445:
427:
426:
415:
414:
413:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
352:
330:
291:
290:
283:
265:Edgar Thurston
251:
250:
227:
226:
193:
192:
129:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
497:
485:
483:
479:
474:
468:
467:
464:
460:
456:
452:
449:
448:
443:
439:
433:
428:
424:
422:
417:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
396:
387:
383:
379:
374:
370:
365:
361:
357:
353:
351:
347:
343:
338:
337:
336:
333:
328:
322:
321:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
295:
294:
293:
292:
289:
286:
281:
275:
272:
271:
266:
262:
259:
256:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
234:
229:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
472:
469:
450:
431:
419:
398:
331:My Tea Kadai
318:
296:
284:My Tea Kadai
268:
254:
211:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
159:free images
54:Mark Arsten
403:Shrikanthv
364:Casablanca
356:Mein Kampf
478:talk page
455:SalHamton
239:• Gene93k
37:talk page
480:or in a
421:Relisted
378:Qwyrxian
305:Qwyrxian
297:Question
198:Qwyrxian
120:View log
39:or in a
437:contact
373:Brahmin
165:WP refs
153:scholar
93:protect
88:history
451:Delete
399:Delete
362:, and
301:WP:GNG
273:. See
212:Delete
137:Google
97:delete
50:delete
360:Bible
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
459:talk
407:talk
382:talk
346:talk
342:Stfg
326:Ravi
309:talk
279:Ravi
260:and
255:Keep
243:talk
220:talk
216:Stfg
202:talk
173:FENS
147:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
267:'s
187:TWL
122:•
118:– (
461:)
440:)
409:)
384:)
358:,
348:)
311:)
245:)
235:.
222:)
204:)
167:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
457:(
434:(
405:(
380:(
344:(
307:(
241:(
218:(
200:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.