407:. Mulberry wasn't actively developed since 2007 and became nowadays completely unusable because of its outdated codebase. Most clients with an article have very likely less users than GyazMail and many of them aren't even actively developed anymore. Besides that, Knowledge is an electronic encyclopedia, so there is no need to save paper. Actually I perceive these recurring requests for deletion as aggravating and pointless trolling.
558:. A perfectly reasonable nomination when unsourced, but we now have Macworld reviews from 2005, 2008 and 2013 in the article. They aren't huge, but the are neutral and independent and directly related to the product. A product of this longevity that has been noted and reviewed in independent trade publications repeatedly would appear to safely cross the notability threshold.
302:. I prodded this article a few months ago for being a "non-notable application" but the article's creator claimed in the edit summary when removing the prod, "GyazMail is the only classical native-GUI alternative to Apple Mail that is still actively supportet and developed". That is not enough to prove that something is notable. A
169:
463:
122:
259:
242:
225:
163:
310:
as the second source mentioned only trivially mentions GyazMail. The first source is not significant coverage of the subject so the subject is not notable. -
279:
368:, the clock is still ticking for GyazMail. Also, author Goichi Hirakawa, and his 2003-2017 (14 years) accomplishment compares favorably with that of
584:
583:
There is 2-3 reliable sources have been identified, but the rest seem a bit questionable, so it might not pass the notability guideline as
129:
346:
480:
Two thirds of the mail clients mentioned on
Knowledge are less notable than GyazMail. Do you really want to delete all of them?
459:
17:
458:
The focus should be on the notability of the subject. The arguments used seem very similar to some of the ones listed here
568:
424:
95:
90:
184:
287:
99:
151:
585:
the number of references does not matter when these sources do not meet the requirements for establishing notability
592:
526:
502:
471:
213:
615:
82:
40:
404:
267:
283:
145:
611:
588:
467:
373:
247:
230:
209:
36:
485:
449:
430:
412:
307:
201:
141:
596:
575:
548:
517:
489:
475:
453:
434:
416:
385:
317:
291:
271:
251:
234:
217:
177:
64:
513:
263:
347:
https://www.macworld.com/article/2058525/ditch-maverickss-mail-other-email-apps-you-can-try.html
191:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
610:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
564:
381:
303:
335:
481:
445:
443:
426:
408:
542:
55:
157:
86:
360:. While this one-programmer project has not to-date had the same impact as the late
369:
205:
306:
search only found the sources and , but those sources are not enough to indicate
116:
559:
377:
440:
400:
312:
537:
361:
396:
78:
70:
365:
604:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
529:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
505:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
336:
https://www.macworld.com/article/1132663/gyazmail15.html
112:
108:
104:
176:
462:. Another essay which provides a good point as well:
208:. Also contains little if any encyclopedic content.
535:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
511:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
399:should be deleted. We have also an article about
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
618:). No further edits should be made to this page.
395:. I can't see the point why the article about
260:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
243:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
226:list of Software-related deletion discussions
204:. Article seems to be only original research
190:
8:
278:Note: This debate has been included in the
258:Note: This debate has been included in the
241:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:Note: This debate has been included in the
464:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
280:list of Japan-related deletion discussions
277:
257:
240:
223:
202:Knowledge's General notability guideline
328:
7:
24:
376:'s 1988-2006 range (18 years).
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
65:09:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
597:17:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
576:13:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
549:01:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
518:00:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
490:17:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
476:03:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
454:15:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
435:15:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
417:15:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
386:09:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
318:16:39, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
292:12:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
272:09:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
252:08:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
235:08:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
218:19:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
635:
439:And another two sources:
607:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
405:Mulberry (email client)
423:PS: another reference
460:Subjective importance
573:
571:So let it be done
566:
551:
520:
294:
284:Shawn in Montreal
274:
254:
237:
63:
626:
609:
589:FockeWulf FW 190
569:
565:
545:
540:
534:
532:
530:
510:
508:
506:
468:FockeWulf FW 190
349:
344:
338:
333:
250:
233:
210:FockeWulf FW 190
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
634:
633:
629:
628:
627:
625:
624:
623:
622:
616:deletion review
605:
572:
552:
543:
538:
525:
523:
521:
501:
499:
354:
353:
352:
345:
341:
334:
330:
246:
229:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
632:
630:
621:
620:
600:
599:
578:
570:
533:
522:
509:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
437:
420:
419:
389:
388:
351:
350:
339:
327:
326:
322:
321:
320:
296:
295:
275:
255:
238:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
631:
619:
617:
613:
608:
602:
601:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
579:
577:
574:
567:
563:
562:
557:
554:
553:
550:
547:
546:
541:
531:
528:
519:
516:
515:
514:GeoffreyT2000
507:
504:
491:
487:
483:
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:
455:
451:
447:
444:
441:
438:
436:
432:
428:
425:
422:
421:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
390:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:Keep or Merge
356:
355:
348:
343:
340:
337:
332:
329:
325:
319:
315:
314:
309:
308:WP:NOTABILITY
305:
301:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
276:
273:
269:
265:
264:Coolabahapple
261:
256:
253:
249:
248:North America
244:
239:
236:
232:
231:North America
227:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
606:
603:
580:
560:
555:
536:
524:
512:
500:
392:
370:Steve Dorner
357:
342:
331:
323:
311:
299:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
164:free images
482:Liebeskind
446:Liebeskind
427:Liebeskind
409:Liebeskind
324:References
58:Sandstein
612:talk page
362:Phil Katz
304:WP:BEFORE
37:talk page
614:or in a
527:Relisted
503:Relisted
397:GyazMail
123:View log
79:GyazMail
71:GyazMail
39:or in a
581:Comment
401:Trojitá
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
561:Xymmax
378:Pi314m
374:Eudora
300:Delete
200:Fails
142:Google
100:delete
366:PKZIP
313:KAP03
206:WP:OR
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
593:talk
556:Keep
486:talk
472:talk
450:talk
431:talk
413:talk
403:and
393:Keep
382:talk
288:talk
268:talk
214:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
544:947
466:.
372:'s
364:'s
316:()
192:TWL
121:– (
595:)
587:.
488:)
474:)
452:)
442:,
433:)
415:)
384:)
290:)
282:.
270:)
262:.
245:.
228:.
216:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
52:.
591:(
539:J
484:(
470:(
448:(
429:(
411:(
380:(
286:(
266:(
212:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.