Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Doris Egbring-Kahn (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

304:'s adjudication. I presumed there were at least a couple or so relistings, but the lack of more responses indicate to me at any rate a strong lack of community interest. The question of whether an AFD should be closed as "no consensus" if there is one keep vote and one delete vote varies depending on circumstances and admins, so perhaps there should be a more consistent approach. But, anyway, leaving this illiterate stub is just something that I feel strongly against. It should be sent back to the article creator's sandbox for improvement. 273:
had two participants other than from the nominator, but after two relistings, the overall input was inadequate for a consensus to be determined. This counters the notion of "Complete lack of community interest confirms non-notability" stated in the nomination herein. Furthermore, lack of input at AfD
379:
as a clear delete as both this and her listed filmography clearly show minor works and nothing amounting to actual substance since her works are so few, there's simply nothing else because there's no significance as an actress, and given she was only a rarely occasional actress, that's all there is.
323:
I have no opinion as yet on notability, but must point out that most of the claimed illiteracy could be fixed simply by moving a date, which I have done. It takes far less effort to fix such things than to whinge about them. The phrase "the Grandma" should also be changed to either "the grandma" or
425:
So while you try to blame and shame the wrong editor "to end re-nominations by the same editor" -- something which, as I said, I have done maybe a handful of times to my recollection since 2005 -- which is why I didn't even know about
180: 79: 410:-- better editors than you have tried to get me blackballed. I very rarely renominate articles which survive AFDs. Since 2005, I can't remember doing so more than a handful of times, most recently 232: 133: 174: 297: 270: 74: 214:
this illiterate stub was AFDed once and closed and no consensus. Intolerable result which must be rectified. Complete lack of community interest confirms non-notability.
422:). Incidentally, one (1) keep vote and one (1) delete vote after several relistings indicate a serious lack of community interest and the AFD should have succeeded. 568:
Per what I said last time. Sad thing is that the actress was at her prime a stage actress, therefore sources about the bulk of her work will be print, not online.
249: 140: 342: 448:
I'm redacting my comment because the purpose was a goal of improving the quality of AfD nominations.  I don't plan to further respond in this AfD.
106: 101: 110: 493: 325: 93: 577: 558: 531: 499: 457: 443: 398: 371: 354: 333: 314: 284: 258: 241: 224: 58: 195: 162: 17: 350: 516: 156: 540: 470: 596: 554: 453: 367: 40: 488: 434: 393: 305: 215: 152: 411: 329: 97: 346: 202: 592: 301: 280: 254: 237: 54: 36: 573: 550: 449: 407: 363: 527: 511: 483: 480: 430:-- perhaps you should concentrate on those who are genuinely abusing the procedures and protocols. 381: 188: 89: 64: 168: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
591:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
427: 569: 519: 523: 419: 415: 127: 275: 414:
and only when, as in this case and the Nelson case, I felt strongly (see
274:
discussions has no bearing whatsoever upon whether or not a topic is
585:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
300:
had one trivial comment and one keep vote. I meant no insult to
509:
based on the 7-paragraph profile about her in 26 February 2011
324:"Grandma". Maybe the nominator would like to make that choice? 543:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
473:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
233:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
80:
Articles for deletion/Doris Egbring-Kahn (2nd nomination)
123: 119: 115: 187: 549:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 479:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 432:Please include this reply in your "evidence file". 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 599:). No further edits should be made to this page. 201: 8: 518:, plus her long list of credits as noted in 341:Note: This debate has been included in the 250:list of Germany-related deletion discussions 248:Note: This debate has been included in the 231:Note: This debate has been included in the 343:list of Women-related deletion discussions 340: 247: 230: 75:Articles for deletion/Doris Egbring-Kahn 72: 7: 71: 24: 515:, which I cited in the prior AfD 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 578:12:22, 25 January 2017 (UTC) 559:07:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC) 532:16:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 500:04:38, 10 January 2017 (UTC) 59:12:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC) 458:15:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC) 444:18:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 399:04:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 372:01:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC) 355:20:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC) 334:19:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC) 315:05:13, 3 January 2017 (UTC) 285:04:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC) 259:04:34, 3 January 2017 (UTC) 242:04:34, 3 January 2017 (UTC) 225:04:17, 3 January 2017 (UTC) 616: 588:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 412:Chris Nelson (director) 298:previous AfD discussion 271:previous AfD discussion 302:@User:Northamerica1000 70:AfDs for this article: 512:Berliner Morgenpost 90:Doris Egbring-Kahn 65:Doris Egbring-Kahn 561: 522:'s keep !vote. -- 502: 357: 347:Shawn in Montreal 261: 244: 607: 590: 548: 546: 544: 496: 491: 486: 478: 476: 474: 441: 408:@Unscintillating 396: 391: 312: 283: 269:– Actually, the 257: 240: 222: 206: 205: 191: 143: 131: 113: 57: 34: 615: 614: 610: 609: 608: 606: 605: 604: 603: 597:deletion review 586: 562: 551:Spirit of Eagle 539: 537: 503: 494: 489: 484: 469: 467: 450:Unscintillating 438:Quis separabit? 435: 394: 382: 364:Unscintillating 309:Quis separabit? 306: 279: 253: 236: 219:Quis separabit? 216: 148: 139: 104: 88: 85: 68: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 613: 611: 602: 601: 581: 580: 547: 536: 535: 534: 477: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 423: 402: 401: 374: 359: 358: 337: 336: 320: 319: 318: 317: 288: 287: 263: 262: 245: 209: 208: 145: 84: 83: 82: 77: 69: 67: 62: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 612: 600: 598: 594: 589: 583: 582: 579: 575: 571: 567: 564: 563: 560: 556: 552: 545: 542: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 514: 513: 508: 505: 504: 501: 497: 492: 487: 482: 475: 472: 459: 455: 451: 447: 446: 445: 442: 440: 439: 433: 429: 424: 421: 417: 413: 409: 406: 405: 404: 403: 400: 397: 392: 389: 385: 378: 375: 373: 369: 365: 361: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 339: 338: 335: 331: 327: 326:86.17.222.157 322: 321: 316: 313: 311: 310: 303: 299: 296:actually the 295: 292: 291: 290: 289: 286: 282: 281:North America 277: 272: 268: 265: 264: 260: 256: 255:North America 251: 246: 243: 239: 238:North America 234: 229: 228: 227: 226: 223: 221: 220: 213: 204: 200: 197: 194: 190: 186: 182: 179: 176: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 154: 151: 150:Find sources: 146: 142: 138: 135: 129: 125: 121: 117: 112: 108: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 86: 81: 78: 76: 73: 66: 63: 61: 60: 56: 55:North America 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 587: 584: 565: 538: 510: 506: 468: 437: 436: 431: 387: 383: 376: 308: 307: 293: 266: 218: 217: 211: 210: 198: 192: 184: 177: 171: 165: 159: 149: 136: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 175:free images 570:Agathoclea 520:Agathoclea 593:talk page 524:Arxiloxos 507:Weak keep 428:WP:BEFORE 294:Commment: 37:talk page 595:or in a 541:Relisted 471:Relisted 134:View log 39:or in a 481:King of 276:notable 267:Comment 212:Delete: 181:WP refs 169:scholar 107:protect 102:history 390:wister 386:wister 377:Delete 153:Google 111:delete 196:JSTOR 157:books 141:Stats 128:views 120:watch 116:links 16:< 574:talk 566:Keep 555:talk 528:talk 454:talk 420:BOLD 418:and 395:talk 368:talk 351:talk 330:talk 189:FENS 163:news 124:logs 98:talk 94:edit 416:IAR 362:. 203:TWL 132:– ( 52:. 576:) 557:) 530:) 498:♠ 456:) 370:) 353:) 345:. 332:) 278:. 252:. 235:. 183:) 126:| 122:| 118:| 114:| 109:| 105:| 100:| 96:| 572:( 553:( 526:( 495:♣ 490:♦ 485:♥ 452:( 388:T 384:S 366:( 349:( 328:( 207:) 199:· 193:· 185:· 178:· 172:· 166:· 160:· 155:( 147:( 144:) 137:· 130:) 92:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
North America
12:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Doris Egbring-Kahn
Articles for deletion/Doris Egbring-Kahn
Articles for deletion/Doris Egbring-Kahn (2nd nomination)
Doris Egbring-Kahn
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Quis separabit?

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.