265:
of wikipedia articles for producing, arranging, and recording, but no article existed for him. In the case of Conway Twitty, wikipedia articles did already exist for his predecessor Owen
Bradley, and the producer that followed him Ron Chancey. Based on this, and the numerous references to his name in Knowledge, I created the article. The article was initially rejected due to a lack of external references, so once I added the eight external references, I re-submitted it for review. At the time, the review process seemed to be substantially backlogged, so after a week of waiting, I moved it into production given the only objection in the initial refusal was references. I've attempted to source references from a range of websites, included photographic evidence then and now. I would assume that wikipedia would want to have information as complete as possible on every subject, and there are literally hundreds of search results available on Google and Yahoo search associating David Barnes with Conway Twitty, Nat Stuckey, Margo Smith and others such as Mo Bandy and Roy Clark, I chose only some of the most complete. If you can make constructive suggestions on how to improve the article, we would certainly do all we can to comply. Thanks!
343:
published materials that are available on the web, but to this point I was primarily attempting to provide information and background to support other existing pages on
Knowledge that reference his name. What is the best way to provide that additional information - should I provide it here, update the article, or simply provide a list of offline sources by e-mail? Should I also provide the additional background information? For example, Conway's son, Michael Twitty (currently in branson) recoreded one of his song's on his most recent album and it is available for download on itunes and amazon.com, but writer information for the album is not published on the web, you'd have to buy the album and read the liner notes for example. I'll provide whatever is useful in whatever format makes the most sense. Thanks!
307:
the biographical information outside the fact that you submitted it yourself. Word of mouth is not a source, nor is "but I'm related to David Barnes". The current sources are merely directory listings that only say that he produced such and such, and one of them is a personal blog which is generally
264:
In reference to the above, I am user
Davbarne, and in regards to the COI, I am related to the producer and am responsible for monitoring references to him on the web including Youtube, Knowledge, ASCAP.com, Billboard, etc. I created the article because I found his name referenced in literally dozens
550:
Based on the above, I created a page for Mr. Barnes and provided information in support of the articles referenced above, so that if someone reading those articles wanted to click on the David Barnes in those articles, they could. If it does not make sense to provide the added level of backgound on
522:
Given that I'm a frequent user and new contributer to
Knowledge, I certainly want to comply to whatever rules, regulations, and standards of notoriety support the integrity of the site and its content. As I indicated earlier in the thread, what prompted the article creation was numberous references
543:
When I reviewed these articles, I noticed that Mr. Barnes predecessor as a producer (Owen
Bradley) has a page, and his successor (Ron Chancey) also has a page. In the case of Ron Chancey's wikipedia page below, it is essentially a one line description and a pointer to a defunct web page that is no
342:
I believe I can provide a list of offline publications, some of which are cataloged in an online format, but not the content of the article that provide biograhical information on him. I do have a greater amount of biographical information available on David Barnes, along with other links to other
551:
Mr. Barnes for someone visiting the above referenced articles, the article can be deleted. I don't believe providing this information to the public in this format detracts from the information base of
Knowledge, but I will defer to the better judgment of the most frequest editors/admins. Thanks!
187:
Asserts notability as a producer, but I can't find any biographical sources. It's entirely possible for a producer to work with notable artist but not be notable himself — there is literally NO biographical info to be found anywhere, and I've searched high and low with various keywords. "David
393:. I know who Michael Twitty is, but it wouldn't be a relevant mention since Michael himself doesn't have an article and isn't likely to. Just add the newspaper/magazine references yourself to the article by citing the newspaper name, article name, writer and date.
156:
544:
longer registered is seems. There is far less information on the web and in publication on Mr. Chancey than available on Mr. Barnes, so in the spirit of understanding "Why does that page exist if this page should not?"
188:
Barnes" + "Conway Twitty" turned up only Barnes' name being listed in directories. "David Barnes" + "Nat
Stuckey" turned up no results, as did "David Barnes" + "Margo Smith". There is NOTHING on this guy. Notability is
320:
from working with otherwise notable people. I will grant that his production career being back in the pre-Internet days might limit things some, but if you know of any newspapers/books/magazines that gave
242:
150:
117:
90:
85:
410:
Thanks for your guidance. I'm assembling a more thorough biography and references this week and will begin updating the article by the end of this week.
94:
77:
590:
398:
330:
229:
214:
171:
138:
581:
There still aren't any substantial sources. The amount of information is irrelevant; the content of other articles is irrelevant. See
287:
224:
ETA: The article was also created out of process, as the user moved it from AFC to article space even after it was declined at AFC.
312:— not just the single lines in directory listings, as is the case now. It's okay if the sources are offline, as long as they give
485:
195:
Also it should be noted that the article is currently sourced entirely to blogs and commercial listings for albums, and a user
17:
618:
567:
426:
359:
281:
206:
132:
128:
622:
594:
571:
516:
497:
460:
430:
402:
363:
334:
316:
mention that amounts to more than just "David Barnes produced X", and ideally, biographical info on him. Notability is
295:
257:
233:
218:
59:
582:
178:
81:
638:
308:
not considered a reliable source. Another source is just you being name-dropped in an ad. The sources have to be
36:
637:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
73:
65:
491:
317:
291:
189:
144:
456:
387:
606:
555:
479:
414:
347:
269:
253:
610:
559:
418:
351:
273:
196:
164:
614:
563:
422:
377:
355:
277:
200:
192:, so if you say "keep, he worked with notable singers", I'll have to trout some sense into you.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
452:
441:
585:. As I said, the only sources I've found are one-line mentions, which are not sufficient.
473:
249:
512:
507:- I cannot find significant coverage about this individual to establish notability. --
55:
602:
Ok - thanks for the input. I'm in favor based on the above of deleting the article.
111:
535:
304:
532:
529:
444:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
508:
50:
526:
523:
to David Barnes (producer) in other
Knowledge articles including:
631:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
545:
538:
243:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
107:
103:
99:
163:
451:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
536:http://en.wikipedia.org/I%27d_Love_to_Lay_You_Down
209:) created the article, so there is very high COI.
533:http://en.wikipedia.org/I_May_Never_Get_to_Heaven
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
641:). No further edits should be made to this page.
530:http://en.wikipedia.org/Happy_Birthday_Darlin%27
177:
8:
527:http://en.wikipedia.org/Don%27t_Take_It_Away
241:Note: This debate has been included in the
325:information on HIM, then that should fly.
240:
373:The newspaper articles can be cited with
7:
546:http://en.wikipedia.org/Ron_Chancey
539:http://en.wikipedia.org/Nat_Stuckey
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
284:) 16:01, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
303:There's currently no way to
623:14:36, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
595:21:55, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
572:21:12, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
517:16:56, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
498:01:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
461:01:01, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
431:17:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
403:17:02, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
364:13:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
335:23:02, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
296:16:11, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
258:04:32, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
234:03:43, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
219:02:57, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
60:18:17, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
658:
383:, magazine articles with
634:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
74:David Barnes (producer)
66:David Barnes (producer)
583:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
593:and a clue-bat •
401:and a clue-bat •
333:and a clue-bat •
232:and a clue-bat •
217:and a clue-bat •
44:The result was
626:
609:comment added by
575:
558:comment added by
463:
434:
417:comment added by
367:
350:comment added by
286:
272:comment added by
260:
246:
649:
636:
625:
603:
588:
587:Ten Pound Hammer
574:
552:
494:
488:
482:
476:
450:
446:
433:
411:
396:
395:Ten Pound Hammer
392:
386:
382:
376:
366:
344:
328:
327:Ten Pound Hammer
285:
266:
247:
227:
226:Ten Pound Hammer
212:
211:Ten Pound Hammer
182:
181:
167:
115:
97:
34:
657:
656:
652:
651:
650:
648:
647:
646:
645:
639:deletion review
632:
604:
586:
553:
492:
486:
480:
474:
439:
412:
394:
390:
384:
380:
374:
345:
326:
267:
225:
210:
190:WP:NOTINHERITED
124:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
655:
653:
644:
643:
600:
599:
598:
597:
520:
519:
501:
500:
466:
465:
464:
448:
447:
436:
408:
407:
406:
405:
340:
339:
338:
337:
262:
261:
237:
236:
185:
184:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
654:
642:
640:
635:
629:
628:
627:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
596:
592:
584:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
548:
547:
541:
540:
537:
534:
531:
528:
524:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
502:
499:
495:
489:
483:
477:
471:
470:Speedy delete
468:
467:
462:
458:
454:
449:
445:
443:
438:
437:
435:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
404:
400:
389:
379:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
336:
332:
324:
319:
318:not inherited
315:
311:
306:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
293:
289:
283:
279:
275:
271:
259:
255:
251:
244:
239:
238:
235:
231:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
208:
205:
202:
198:
193:
191:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
633:
630:
605:— Preceding
601:
554:— Preceding
549:
542:
525:
521:
504:
469:
440:
413:— Preceding
409:
388:cite journal
346:— Preceding
341:
322:
313:
309:
288:173.37.200.6
268:— Preceding
263:
203:
194:
186:
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
453:Ron Ritzman
310:substantial
151:free images
591:his otters
475:nymets2000
399:his otters
331:his otters
250:Tom Morris
230:his otters
215:his otters
378:cite news
323:extensive
619:contribs
611:Davbarne
607:unsigned
568:contribs
560:Davbarne
556:unsigned
442:Relisted
427:contribs
419:Davbarne
415:unsigned
360:contribs
352:Davbarne
348:unsigned
282:contribs
274:Davbarne
270:unsigned
207:contribs
197:Davbarne
118:View log
157:WP refs
145:scholar
91:protect
86:history
505:Delete
314:direct
305:verify
129:Google
95:delete
46:delete
172:JSTOR
133:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
615:talk
564:talk
513:talk
509:Whpq
457:talk
423:talk
356:talk
292:talk
278:talk
254:talk
201:talk
165:FENS
139:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
48:. —
472:A7
179:TWL
116:– (
621:)
617:•
589:,
570:)
566:•
515:)
496:)
459:)
429:)
425:•
397:,
391:}}
385:{{
381:}}
375:{{
362:)
358:•
329:,
294:)
280:•
256:)
245:.
228:,
213:,
159:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
613:(
562:(
511:(
493:l
490:/
487:c
484:/
481:t
478:(
455:(
421:(
354:(
290:(
276:(
252:(
248:—
204:·
199:(
183:)
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
123:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.