146:. The article would be of interest to readers looking for sources on both sides of the debate, as well as to those who had come across his name – perhaps because of the letter – and wanted to know a little more about him. It's thin at the moment, so stick a stub template on it, or expand it. (I think that he's wrong, but what does that have to do with it?) And if Knowledge (XXG) only had articles on people that the average VfD addict agreed to be “notable” it would be limited to dead people, software gurus, and comic-book writers.
93:. Article does not establish notability, as it stands it's a quote from a letter to the editor. Not sure he passes the average professor test. Nearly every professor has been published in journals in their field; you don't stay a professor if you don't. -
80:, Google Test turns up a number of David Douglass's, most of which are however not the man in question. I am assuming though he is the Professor of Physics & Experimental Condensed Matter Physics at Rochester University, homepage here
158:
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.
54:
A physicist who once wrote a letter to the Wall Street
Journal. Apparently, he doesn't believe in global warming. If he is for some reason notable in his lack of belief (or for some other reason), the article should say so.
56:
117:
deserve some mention, as well as expanding his bio. He's certainly a notable dissenter. I've done a little bit of cleanup on the article, and I will do some more in a few hours. --
83:. Has had a number of his works published in physics and climate journals. His research has created a stir in global warming circles. I'm voting a keep on this one.
17:
31:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
131:
and expand. Open scientific debate is very important, and the loyal opposition should get a fair hearing.
132:
81:
122:
41:
59:
reveals some hits (possibly not for the same person), but nothing that appears very noteworthy.
114:
27:
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below.
147:
118:
84:
48:
38:
94:
71:
60:
104:
70:. I got a letter published in the newspaper too. Can I have my own article?
113:and expand. I do not agree with Douglass, but his
103:. Current article does not establish notability.
138:User since Feb 3, edits to only two articles.
8:
35:Keep 4, Delete 3. No consensus. Keep.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
33:The result of the debate was
161:Please do not edit this page
29:This page is no longer live.
178:
63:00:45, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
44:03:40, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
135:22:48, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
97:22:54, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
87:03:58, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
74:03:32, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
154:22:31, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
125:06:34, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
107:04:54, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
169:
151:
177:
176:
172:
171:
170:
168:
167:
166:
165:
149:
52:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
175:
173:
156:
155:
141:
140:
139:
126:
108:
98:
88:
75:
51:
49:David Douglass
46:
32:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
174:
164:
162:
153:
145:
142:
137:
136:
134:
130:
127:
124:
120:
116:
112:
109:
106:
102:
99:
96:
92:
89:
86:
82:
79:
76:
73:
69:
66:
65:
64:
62:
58:
50:
47:
45:
43:
40:
36:
30:
19:
160:
157:
148:Mel Etitis (
143:
133:69.212.36.88
128:
115:publications
110:
100:
90:
77:
67:
53:
34:
28:
26:
150:Μελ Ετητης
119:Viriditas
85:Megan1967
39:AllyUnion
95:R. fiend
72:Gamaliel
57:Googling
61:Tuf-Kat
105:Edeans
101:Delete
91:Delete
68:Delete
42:(talk)
16:<
144:Keep
129:Keep
123:Talk
111:Keep
78:Keep
163:.
121:|
37:--
152:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.