Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Detroit Tigers minor league players (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source πŸ“

2060:) we've never developed a workable consensus about which minor league players merit articles. In this context, I think these lists of minor league players have been an excellent move toward compromise. On the one hand, they recognize that there is encyclopedic interest in minor league players and coverage is available from reliable sources. On the other hand, they also recognize that permanent biographies are not needed for most players who don't go on to reach the major leagues or achieve other notable career distinctions. The player's name remains on the list while he's playing for the organization, and then the name is dropped. Because discussion of the players on these lists is limited to their role as ballplayers, it avoids the 2052:- Minor league baseball players have always been in the gray area of Knowledge notability guidelines. On the one hand, their names and accounts of their games appear in reliable sources and they are paid for playing, making them "professional athletes." On the other hand, baseball's minor leagues are primarily developmental in nature; their main objective is to take a large group of prospects and develop a small percentage of them to be capable of playing at the major league level. Consequently, many minor league baseball players are little known outside of their small circle of fans, generally located in the smaller cities and towns where they play. Many of them have very short and non-memorable careers, leading to 2419:- I believe that the articles can maintained properly, and is a quick and easy tool to located information. Sure the players are not notable when looked at individually, but the teams are notable, in fact most minor league teams have pages. If you are going to have minor league team articles, makes sense to include the players in some fashion. With most players likely to never get above redlink, a team's player template is not realistic. 2276:: Is this a joke? I have not read one good argument for a delete. Each article serves a major purpose: i.e. a comprehensive guide to each teams minor league players. It is convienent for those who want to see an organizations players, managers, and coaches all at once (opposed to navigating through 6+ minor league articles per team to find that same info). 1960:
The teams within the farm system are notable, and this is preferable to individual articles about each minor league team's rosters. So there are red-link names on there? Big frickin' deal. There is no rule that all of the persons mentioned on a page have to have their own page. While I think most
2325:
As said before, the lists of each club's farm system teams can easily be rolled into the parent club's article. Leaving us once again with a list of names that would not pass muster in any other article. They wouldn't be acceptable for inclusion in calendar year articles. They wouldn't be acceptable
2205:
But if an article was written about your place of work, there is no reason why the mere mention of your name within that article whould be prohibited-- and it has absolutely nothing to do with whether you are notable enough to merit your own separate page. Knowledge is not censored, and so long as
1488:
For all intents and purposes, this and every other "X minor league players" is really nothing but a list of redlinked names, who will remain redlinked until they make a major league appearance. The general consensus for minor league ballplayers, especially those below AA level, is that they are not
2297:
1. A lot of the discussion is about redlinks. Keep in mind, Knowledge is all about links. The "What links here" function is a major tool to an article (either a red- or blue-linked one). Since this tool operates the same regardless if a link is red or blue, it is especially useful with redlink
1763:
The subject of minor league players within a Major League organization is certainly notable. The rosters have been maintained and kept up to date, that is not a problem. These pages allow an easy way to see all the players within a baseball organization in an easy location. This is both useful and
2233:
I have no problem with a redlinked name, and would prefer that to removing wikilink, for the simple reason that the second an article is written, it becomes blue-linked. There is no reason to remember to go back and re-link it. The only potential problem is that for every one major league player,
1853:
I don't really have a problem with these. The players themselves may not merit individual articles, but the rosters are good information to have. There are plenty of people who want to keep track of up-and-coming players. The rosters for these teams are usually listed in newspapers when they are
1800:
That is a completely ridiculous comment. The farm system of a major league baseball team is far more notable than a list of cities where it rained... Not only are there plenty of reliable sources for this information, there are also plenty of people who actively seek out this information and the
2361:
You misunderstand. I meant listing the minor league teams sans rosters. And I repeat. The same guys are not worthy of individual articles, and adding their names to their high school or college alumni lists would be immediately reverted. Same goes for adding their birthdays to the date and year
1596:
Then we should have one for the Yankees, Orioles, Rays, Dodgers, Giants, Twins, Red Sox, Blue Jays, Padres, Rockies, Diamondbacks, Royals, Tigers, Indians, White Sox, Athletics, Angels, Rangers, Mariners, Braves, Reds, Cubs, Brewers, Mets, Marlins, Nationals, Cardinals, Phillies, Astros, and
1940:
Even if the only thing on these pages is the rosters it makes them worthwhile. This is the only place you can see all the rosters of one organization on the same page. The only alternative would be to put them on the pages of the Major League team, and that just makes those pages longer.
1719:
Right, but I don't think that's the issue here, especially when there are only five or six players listed on each article. If you're referring to the full rosters, those are just transcluded templates. They're kept pretty up-to-date themselves at least the Tigers rosters are. β€”
2000:
There are plenty of other places outside Knowledge for those interested in such things to keep track of these guys. Those people already go there. Knowledge is for after they've made a name for themselves. The players on these lists have not, and a good many of them never will.
1666:
This information is likely to change much more frequently than editors will realistically keep up with it, given the transitive nature of minor league baseball. These pages are not particularly encyclopedic and likely to reflect poorly on the overall accuracy of
2469:)? Also, please do not remove red links; they may not look good but they help to build our encyclopedia. Even our featured articles and featured lists have them; there is no good reason to delink them (unless the subjects are truly and always will non-notable). 1742:
players within the organization (major and minor) would be more maintainable as you're not moving as much around amongst lists unless, obviously, trades occur, players are released, or free agents sign with a new team. With that being said, I am leaning towards
2402:- Maintained properly, I believe the creation of these pages provides good information on the top prospects in each organizations minor league affiliates. While the players themselves may not be notable enough to merit a page, the group as a whole does. 1537:
They're not notable enough on they're own. Why do we need an entire list of non-notables? A guy who never makes beyond AA ball will never get an article. That redlink will always be a redlink. Isn't it a general rule to avoid lists of redlinked names?
86: 81: 1983:. I agree that there are plenty of Wikipedians who would maintain this type of rise-and-fall of players. Worthy good-faith attempt to throw this one out, but it looks like the closing umpire is going to have to call this one "safe at second base". 2448:
enough. Common sense actually says the opposite of what you state: All of these players earn a living playing baseball full time. That is professional, no matter how you wish to rationalize the difference between the major and minor leagues.
2440:"They are professional per WP:ATHLETE only in the most technical sense. Common sense says they are not professional enough for inclusion." is a patently ridiculous statement by the nominator. You are confusing your opinion of whether they are 2301:
2. If this deletion discussion is once agaaaain about the (non)notability of minor league players, then the individual roster templates should be nominated for deletion. This is not the forum for that - this is something different.
1854:
unveiled, which shows that there is interest in this level of detail. If a player doesn't seem notable, just remove the brackets around his name. Maintenance shouldn't be a problem, unless the baseball editors suddenly go on strike.
2376:
Most of the listed players are not notable enough for standalone articles but many are. And there is no problem with the ones without an article being included in these lists, since the rosters they are included in are notable.
1815:
Please observe ]. I said my comment was oversimplified. Knowledge is an encyclopedia, not a "current-status-of" resource. We don't have an article "Today's NBC TV schedule, even though people look things like that up.
585: 580: 2234:
there are about 11 minor league players, and so the list will eventually become huge, assuming nobody will be deleted from the list and people will only be added. My initial thought was to keep, but I'm now thinking
589: 572: 76: 1925:. I feel the purpose of these articles will just be a repository for obviously non-notable people until they make the majors. Finding places to put non-notables is exactly what wikipedia shouldn't be doing. 2343:
Adding these rosters to the Major League club would make those already lengthy articles even longer. These guys play before thousands of fans at minor league parks, they are more notable than high school
1515:- Individual players on a list don't need to be notable themselves. Why is a list of redlinked names a problem? If this was regarding individual player articles, then my opinion may be much different. 2031:
Which could easily be merged into a short "farm system" section of the respective teams. These articles are no more than lists of players who for the most part will never have an individual article.
907: 902: 1459: 1454: 1275: 1270: 953: 948: 911: 1578:
After thinking about it, the minor league players themselves are not notable (for the most part), but the subject of Minor League Baseball Players in the Detroit Tigers Organization is notable. β€”
1871:
per Spanneraol. If there's a better way to discuss the state of minor league organizations I'm all ears. As an aside why do the Tigers keep getting singled out? Is the nominator a Cleveland fan?
1463: 1367: 1362: 1279: 1229: 1224: 957: 1371: 1233: 1183: 1178: 894: 493: 488: 1446: 1262: 1187: 1137: 1132: 940: 631: 626: 497: 447: 442: 401: 396: 355: 350: 171: 166: 2064:
concerns that afflict stand-alone articles. Merging of stand-alone biographies to these lists has been a consensus solution in a number of AfD discussions (for example, see discussions of
1413: 1408: 1354: 1321: 1316: 1216: 1141: 677: 672: 635: 451: 405: 359: 263: 258: 175: 2112:- BRMo said it perfectly. Articles such as these seem to be the best compromise between haveing stand-alone player articles and not providing any information about these players at all. - 1417: 1325: 1170: 1045: 1040: 815: 810: 681: 539: 534: 480: 267: 1124: 1091: 1086: 1049: 819: 769: 764: 618: 576: 543: 434: 388: 342: 309: 304: 217: 212: 158: 114: 109: 2298:
articles because it provides an inventory of the frequency of that article within other articles. This can help determine if it is time for a redlinked article to be created or not.
1400: 1308: 1095: 861: 856: 773: 723: 718: 664: 313: 250: 221: 118: 1032: 999: 994: 865: 802: 727: 526: 2057: 1078: 1003: 756: 296: 204: 101: 848: 710: 986: 568: 147: 2252:
It has already been established that the Baseball WikiProject is updating and maintaining to a suitable standard, so I'm not sure your delete is totally justified.
2073: 898: 2065: 1450: 1266: 944: 1358: 1220: 2570: 2542: 2520: 2497: 2478: 2456: 2432: 2411: 2386: 2371: 2353: 2335: 2311: 2285: 2266: 2247: 2215: 2191: 2173: 2138: 2121: 2104: 2089: 2040: 2026: 2010: 1992: 1950: 1935: 1913: 1896: 1878: 1863: 1839: 1825: 1810: 1790: 1773: 1755: 1729: 1711: 1694: 1677: 1652: 1635: 1613: 1587: 1566: 1547: 1529: 1506: 59: 1884: 1174: 484: 2069: 1128: 622: 438: 392: 346: 162: 1404: 1312: 890: 668: 254: 1442: 1258: 1036: 936: 806: 530: 1350: 1212: 1082: 760: 300: 208: 105: 2362:
articles. Near-instant reversion as not notable. Put these names anywhere in Knowledge but here, and they'll be reverted. It's a double standard.
1166: 852: 714: 476: 1973:
in order to satisfy someone's notions about notability, it does not matter to me whether the "non-notable" players have their names displayed in
1120: 990: 614: 430: 384: 338: 154: 1396: 1304: 660: 246: 1028: 798: 522: 2556:
notable. In order that we don't have so many unnecessary pages that will face deletion themselves, we should maintain all of these pages.
1074: 752: 292: 200: 97: 65: 2156: 844: 706: 2056:
concerns. There have been many AfD fights over biographies of minor league players, and despite several attempts (for example, see
982: 2160: 1821: 1786: 17: 2017:
The articles aren't really about the players but about the farm system of the major league team, which is a notable subject.
1629: 1607: 1685:
Players don't change between minor league organizations that often...probably just as often as Major League players do. β€”
2552:. I don't know if the players, especially the minor minor leaguers would merit pages on their own however as a unit they 2525:
Actually the consensus from the baseball project is that minor leaguers, and especially deep-minors minor leaguers, are
2187: 1835: 1817: 1782: 1707: 1673: 2485: 1599:
Just having one for a bunch of non-notable players except for the AAAers in the Tigers organization is nonsense.--
2585: 36: 2584:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1643:
Yes, this is for all of them, not just the Tigers. A Yankee prospect in A ball isn't notable enough, either.
2516: 2152: 1781:. Not encyclopedic. To oversimplify, no more appropriate than "list of cities where it rained yesterday." 2563: 2183: 2117: 1831: 1703: 1669: 1830:
Retracting my comment because it appears that the Baseball WikiProject can sufficiently handle upkeep.
2349: 2022: 1946: 1904:
Don't kick yourself. The Tigers just got pulled into the line of fire first. They're all tagged now.
1806: 1769: 1552:
Then remove the wikilinks! There are plenty of lists out there that don't link to every single item.
2303: 2277: 1764:
notable. The baseball project is actively maintaining these pages, they should definitely be kept.
2538: 2407: 2367: 2331: 2307: 2281: 2260: 2211: 2036: 2006: 1988: 1909: 1875: 1648: 1560: 1543: 1523: 1502: 2512: 2507:
These should be deleted and indivdual pages made for the players. They are obviously notable per
2493: 2474: 2453: 2427: 2326:
to list as alumni from their high schools or colleges. What makes them any more acceptable here?
2243: 1892: 1859: 1752: 1725: 1690: 1583: 2206:
the subject of the article is notable enough for its own page, the content is up to all of us.
2182:- I am a professional (my occupation) but that doesn't make me notable for a Knowledge article. 1966: 2530: 2508: 2466: 2382: 2164: 2147: 2134: 1490: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
2557: 2113: 1979: 1497:
for inclusion. Consider this a blanket nomination for every MLB team's minor leaguer list.
2345: 2101: 2053: 2018: 1942: 1802: 1765: 2534: 2403: 2363: 2327: 2254: 2207: 2168: 2085: 2080:. (By the way, I agree that the wikilinks should be removed for the redlinked names.) 2032: 2002: 1984: 1926: 1905: 1872: 1644: 1554: 1539: 1517: 1498: 2489: 2470: 2450: 2422: 2239: 2077: 2061: 1888: 1855: 1721: 1686: 1622: 1621:
Whoops didn't realize there were for all the other teams, so then maybe delete all.--
1600: 1579: 55: 1801:
purpose of an encyclopedia is to provide information for people who are seeking it.
2378: 2130: 1480: 1434: 1388: 1342: 1296: 1250: 1204: 1158: 1112: 1066: 1020: 974: 928: 882: 836: 790: 744: 698: 652: 606: 560: 514: 468: 422: 376: 330: 284: 238: 192: 135: 1751:
to be a better way to manage lists of MLB players than this method, no offense.
2511:
since they are all professional and are all discussed in third party sources.
2098: 1493:
only in the most technical sense. Common sense says they are not professional
2081: 1970: 48:. My own opinion might be to delete, but I see the consensus is otherwise 87:
Articles for deletion/Detroit Tigers minor league players (3rd nomination)
82:
Articles for deletion/Detroit Tigers minor league players (2nd nomination)
50: 2578:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1489:
notable enough to warrant inclusion. They are professional per
2484:
I wouldn't oppose a merge into something along the lines of
2465:
How can they be paid but not professional (unless they are
77:
Articles for deletion/Detroit Tigers minor league players
2076:). I think these lists are compatible with Knowledge's 1702:- but they do move up and down within an organization. 1476: 1472: 1468: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1016: 1012: 1008: 970: 966: 962: 924: 920: 916: 878: 874: 870: 832: 828: 824: 786: 782: 778: 740: 736: 732: 694: 690: 686: 648: 644: 640: 602: 598: 594: 556: 552: 548: 510: 506: 502: 464: 460: 456: 418: 414: 410: 372: 368: 364: 326: 322: 318: 280: 276: 272: 234: 230: 226: 188: 184: 180: 142: 131: 127: 123: 1883:
I think it was my fault. I mentioned this article in
2058:
Knowledge:WikiProject Baseball/Notability guidelines
2529:notable, in spite of the professional provision of 569:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim minor league players 1961:of us would fight any attempt by someone to turn 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 2588:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 891:Philadelphia Phillies minor league players 1443:San Francisco Giants minor league players 1259:Arizona Diamondbacks minor league players 937:Washington Nationals minor league players 1351:Los Angeles Dodgers minor league players 1213:St. Louis Cardinals minor league players 1167:Pittsburgh Pirates minor league players 477:Kansas City Royals minor league players 74: 2236:delete all as too unwieldy to maintain 1121:Milwaukee Brewers minor league players 615:Oakland Athletics minor league players 431:Cleveland Indians minor league players 385:Chicago White Sox minor league players 339:Toronto Blue Jays minor league players 155:Baltimore Orioles minor league players 1397:San Diego Padres minor league players 1305:Colorado Rockies minor league players 661:Seattle Mariners minor league players 247:New York Yankees minor league players 7: 1029:Cincinnati Reds minor league players 799:Florida Marlins minor league players 523:Minnesota Twins minor league players 1075:Houston Astros minor league players 753:Atlanta Braves minor league players 293:Tampa Bay Rays minor league players 201:Boston Red Sox minor league players 98:Detroit Tigers minor league players 72: 66:Detroit Tigers minor league players 2146:- They are professional players.-- 845:New York Mets minor league players 707:Texas Rangers minor league players 24: 2129:- per BRMo, Zagalejo and others. 983:Chicago Cubs minor league players 2078:guidelines for stand-alone lists 1902:Nothing personal, just business 1747:in their current states. There 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 2486:List of minor league players 2605: 2571:18:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 2543:17:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 2521:14:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 2498:03:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 2479:03:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 2457:00:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 2433:13:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 2412:13:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 2387:20:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2372:19:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2354:14:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2336:12:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2312:03:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2286:03:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2267:02:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2248:02:29, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2216:02:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2192:01:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2174:01:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2139:01:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2122:01:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2105:00:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2090:00:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2041:00:47, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 2027:23:40, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 2011:23:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1993:22:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1951:22:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1936:22:28, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1914:12:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC) 1897:22:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1879:22:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1864:21:57, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1840:21:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1826:21:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1811:21:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1791:21:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1774:20:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1756:20:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1730:20:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1712:19:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1695:19:49, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1678:19:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1653:19:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1636:19:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1614:19:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1588:19:12, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1567:19:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1548:19:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1530:19:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 1507:19:06, 20 March 2009 (UTC) 60:00:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 2581:Please do not modify it. 1738:I would think a list of 32:Please do not modify it. 71:AfDs for this article: 1887:and here we areΒ :( β€” 1818:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz 1783:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz 2444:enough with being 44:The result was 2467:Semi-professional 2172: 1634: 1612: 2596: 2583: 2567: 2425: 2265: 2263: 2257: 2184:CopaceticThought 2150: 1933: 1832:CopaceticThought 1704:CopaceticThought 1670:CopaceticThought 1632: 1628: 1625: 1610: 1606: 1603: 1565: 1563: 1557: 1528: 1526: 1520: 1484: 1466: 1438: 1420: 1392: 1374: 1346: 1328: 1300: 1282: 1254: 1236: 1208: 1190: 1162: 1144: 1116: 1098: 1070: 1052: 1024: 1006: 978: 960: 932: 914: 886: 868: 840: 822: 794: 776: 748: 730: 702: 684: 656: 638: 610: 592: 564: 546: 518: 500: 472: 454: 426: 408: 380: 362: 334: 316: 288: 270: 242: 224: 196: 178: 145: 139: 121: 34: 2604: 2603: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2586:deletion review 2579: 2565: 2423: 2274:Strong Keep All 2261: 2255: 2253: 2074:Matthew Mangini 1927: 1630: 1623: 1608: 1601: 1561: 1555: 1553: 1524: 1518: 1516: 1457: 1441: 1411: 1395: 1365: 1349: 1319: 1303: 1273: 1257: 1227: 1211: 1181: 1165: 1135: 1119: 1089: 1073: 1043: 1027: 997: 981: 951: 935: 905: 889: 859: 843: 813: 797: 767: 751: 721: 705: 675: 659: 629: 613: 583: 567: 537: 521: 491: 475: 445: 429: 399: 383: 353: 337: 307: 291: 261: 245: 215: 199: 169: 153: 141: 112: 96: 93: 91: 69: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2602: 2600: 2591: 2590: 2574: 2573: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2501: 2500: 2460: 2459: 2435: 2414: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2299: 2289: 2288: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2177: 2176: 2141: 2124: 2107: 2092: 2066:Chris Parmelee 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2014: 2013: 1995: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1866: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1794: 1793: 1776: 1758: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1697: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1590: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1486: 1485: 1439: 1393: 1347: 1301: 1255: 1209: 1163: 1117: 1071: 1025: 979: 933: 887: 841: 795: 749: 703: 657: 611: 565: 519: 473: 427: 381: 335: 289: 243: 197: 151: 92: 90: 89: 84: 79: 73: 70: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2601: 2589: 2587: 2582: 2576: 2575: 2572: 2569: 2568: 2561: 2560: 2555: 2551: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2513:Kinston eagle 2510: 2506: 2503: 2502: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2488:or whatever. 2487: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2436: 2434: 2431: 2429: 2428: 2426: 2418: 2415: 2413: 2409: 2405: 2401: 2398: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2360: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2342: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2333: 2329: 2324: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2300: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2291: 2290: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2258: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2232: 2229: 2228: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2175: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2149: 2145: 2142: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2125: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2108: 2106: 2103: 2100: 2096: 2093: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2048: 2047: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2029: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2015: 2012: 2008: 2004: 1999: 1996: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1981: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1959: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1939: 1938: 1937: 1934: 1932: 1931: 1924: 1921: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1877: 1874: 1870: 1867: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1852: 1849: 1848: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1799: 1796: 1795: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1777: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1762: 1759: 1757: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1741: 1737: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1718: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1668: 1663: 1660: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1626: 1620: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1611: 1604: 1598: 1594: 1591: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1574: 1568: 1564: 1558: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1536: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1527: 1521: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1465: 1461: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1419: 1415: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1373: 1369: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1327: 1323: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1281: 1277: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1235: 1231: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1189: 1185: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1143: 1139: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1097: 1093: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1005: 1001: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 964: 959: 955: 950: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 918: 913: 909: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 867: 863: 858: 854: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 821: 817: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 775: 771: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 729: 725: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 683: 679: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 642: 637: 633: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 591: 587: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 545: 541: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 499: 495: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 453: 449: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 407: 403: 398: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 361: 357: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 315: 311: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 269: 265: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 228: 223: 219: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 182: 177: 173: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 149: 144: 137: 133: 129: 125: 120: 116: 111: 107: 103: 99: 95: 94: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 67: 64: 62: 61: 57: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 2580: 2577: 2564: 2558: 2553: 2549: 2526: 2504: 2462: 2461: 2446:professional 2445: 2441: 2437: 2421: 2420: 2416: 2399: 2358: 2340: 2322: 2292: 2273: 2235: 2230: 2179: 2178: 2148:TonyTheTiger 2143: 2126: 2109: 2097:- um, no. 2094: 2049: 1997: 1978: 1974: 1962: 1957: 1929: 1928: 1922: 1901: 1868: 1858: 1850: 1797: 1778: 1760: 1748: 1744: 1739: 1716: 1699: 1682: 1665: 1661: 1640: 1618: 1595: 1592: 1575: 1534: 1512: 1494: 1487: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 2114:NatureBoyMD 2070:Brett Cecil 1923:Weak delete 1885:another AFD 2531:WP:ATHLETE 2509:WP:ATHLETE 2346:Spanneraol 2165:WP:CHICAGO 2019:Spanneraol 1971:blue links 1943:Spanneraol 1803:Spanneraol 1766:Spanneraol 1667:Knowledge. 1662:Delete all 1491:WP:ATHLETE 2535:DarkAudit 2404:Hardnfast 2364:DarkAudit 2328:DarkAudit 2304:Nick22aku 2278:Nick22aku 2256:Jenuk1985 2208:Mandsford 2033:DarkAudit 2003:DarkAudit 1985:Mandsford 1967:red-links 1930:Wizardman 1906:DarkAudit 1873:Mackensen 1645:DarkAudit 1556:Jenuk1985 1540:DarkAudit 1519:Jenuk1985 1499:DarkAudit 2550:Keep All 2490:Dabomb87 2471:Dabomb87 2424:Neonblak 2400:Keep all 2293:Comments 2240:Eauhomme 2144:Keep all 2127:Keep all 2110:Keep all 2095:Keep all 2054:WP:BLP1E 2050:Keep all 1958:Keep all 1889:X96lee15 1856:Zagalejo 1753:MuZemike 1722:X96lee15 1687:X96lee15 1624:Giants27 1602:Giants27 1597:Pirates. 1580:X96lee15 148:View log 2442:notable 2438:comment 2379:Rlendog 2344:alumni. 2323:No joke 2231:Comment 2169:WP:LOTM 2131:Rlendog 1965:of the 1798:Comment 1717:Comment 1700:Comment 1683:Comment 1641:Comment 1619:Comment 1460:protect 1455:history 1414:protect 1409:history 1368:protect 1363:history 1322:protect 1317:history 1276:protect 1271:history 1230:protect 1225:history 1184:protect 1179:history 1138:protect 1133:history 1092:protect 1087:history 1046:protect 1041:history 1000:protect 995:history 954:protect 949:history 908:protect 903:history 862:protect 857:history 816:protect 811:history 770:protect 765:history 724:protect 719:history 678:protect 673:history 632:protect 627:history 586:protect 581:history 540:protect 535:history 494:protect 489:history 448:protect 443:history 402:protect 397:history 356:protect 351:history 310:protect 305:history 264:protect 259:history 218:protect 213:history 172:protect 167:history 115:protect 110:history 2559:Valley 2505:Delete 2102:(talk) 2072:, and 2062:WP:BLP 1969:in to 1876:(talk) 1779:Delete 1745:delete 1593:Delete 1495:enough 1464:delete 1418:delete 1372:delete 1326:delete 1280:delete 1234:delete 1188:delete 1142:delete 1096:delete 1050:delete 1004:delete 958:delete 912:delete 866:delete 820:delete 774:delete 728:delete 682:delete 636:delete 590:delete 544:delete 498:delete 452:delete 406:delete 360:delete 314:delete 268:delete 222:delete 176:delete 143:delete 119:delete 2359:Reply 2341:Reply 2180:Reply 2099:jj137 1998:Reply 1980:r.e.d 1975:black 1535:Reply 1481:views 1473:watch 1469:links 1435:views 1427:watch 1423:links 1389:views 1381:watch 1377:links 1343:views 1335:watch 1331:links 1297:views 1289:watch 1285:links 1251:views 1243:watch 1239:links 1205:views 1197:watch 1193:links 1159:views 1151:watch 1147:links 1113:views 1105:watch 1101:links 1067:views 1059:watch 1055:links 1021:views 1013:watch 1009:links 975:views 967:watch 963:links 929:views 921:watch 917:links 883:views 875:watch 871:links 837:views 829:watch 825:links 791:views 783:watch 779:links 745:views 737:watch 733:links 699:views 691:watch 687:links 653:views 645:watch 641:links 607:views 599:watch 595:links 561:views 553:watch 549:links 515:views 507:watch 503:links 469:views 461:watch 457:links 423:views 415:watch 411:links 377:views 369:watch 365:links 331:views 323:watch 319:links 285:views 277:watch 273:links 239:views 231:watch 227:links 193:views 185:watch 181:links 146:) – ( 136:views 128:watch 124:links 16:< 2566:city 2539:talk 2517:talk 2494:talk 2475:talk 2463:Keep 2454:lute 2451:Reso 2417:Keep 2408:talk 2383:talk 2368:talk 2350:talk 2332:talk 2308:talk 2282:talk 2262:Talk 2244:talk 2212:talk 2188:talk 2135:talk 2118:talk 2086:talk 2082:BRMo 2037:talk 2023:talk 2007:talk 1989:talk 1947:talk 1910:talk 1893:talk 1869:Keep 1851:Keep 1836:talk 1822:talk 1807:talk 1787:talk 1770:talk 1761:Keep 1726:talk 1708:talk 1691:talk 1674:talk 1649:talk 1584:talk 1576:Keep 1562:Talk 1544:talk 1525:Talk 1513:Keep 1503:talk 1477:logs 1451:talk 1447:edit 1431:logs 1405:talk 1401:edit 1385:logs 1359:talk 1355:edit 1339:logs 1313:talk 1309:edit 1293:logs 1267:talk 1263:edit 1247:logs 1221:talk 1217:edit 1201:logs 1175:talk 1171:edit 1155:logs 1129:talk 1125:edit 1109:logs 1083:talk 1079:edit 1063:logs 1037:talk 1033:edit 1017:logs 991:talk 987:edit 971:logs 945:talk 941:edit 925:logs 899:talk 895:edit 879:logs 853:talk 849:edit 833:logs 807:talk 803:edit 787:logs 761:talk 757:edit 741:logs 715:talk 711:edit 695:logs 669:talk 665:edit 649:logs 623:talk 619:edit 603:logs 577:talk 573:edit 557:logs 531:talk 527:edit 511:logs 485:talk 481:edit 465:logs 439:talk 435:edit 419:logs 393:talk 389:edit 373:logs 347:talk 343:edit 327:logs 301:talk 297:edit 281:logs 255:talk 251:edit 235:logs 209:talk 205:edit 189:logs 163:talk 159:edit 132:logs 106:talk 102:edit 56:talk 46:keep 2554:are 2527:not 2161:bio 1977:or 1963:all 1860:^^^ 1749:has 1740:all 51:DGG 2541:) 2533:. 2519:) 2496:) 2477:) 2430:- 2410:) 2385:) 2370:) 2352:) 2334:) 2310:) 2284:) 2259:| 2246:) 2214:) 2190:) 2171:) 2137:) 2120:) 2088:) 2068:, 2039:) 2025:) 2009:) 1991:) 1949:) 1912:) 1895:) 1838:) 1824:) 1809:) 1789:) 1772:) 1728:) 1710:) 1693:) 1676:) 1664:. 1651:) 1586:) 1559:| 1546:) 1522:| 1505:) 1479:| 1475:| 1471:| 1467:| 1462:| 1458:| 1453:| 1449:| 1433:| 1429:| 1425:| 1421:| 1416:| 1412:| 1407:| 1403:| 1387:| 1383:| 1379:| 1375:| 1370:| 1366:| 1361:| 1357:| 1341:| 1337:| 1333:| 1329:| 1324:| 1320:| 1315:| 1311:| 1295:| 1291:| 1287:| 1283:| 1278:| 1274:| 1269:| 1265:| 1249:| 1245:| 1241:| 1237:| 1232:| 1228:| 1223:| 1219:| 1203:| 1199:| 1195:| 1191:| 1186:| 1182:| 1177:| 1173:| 1157:| 1153:| 1149:| 1145:| 1140:| 1136:| 1131:| 1127:| 1111:| 1107:| 1103:| 1099:| 1094:| 1090:| 1085:| 1081:| 1065:| 1061:| 1057:| 1053:| 1048:| 1044:| 1039:| 1035:| 1019:| 1015:| 1011:| 1007:| 1002:| 998:| 993:| 989:| 973:| 969:| 965:| 961:| 956:| 952:| 947:| 943:| 927:| 923:| 919:| 915:| 910:| 906:| 901:| 897:| 881:| 877:| 873:| 869:| 864:| 860:| 855:| 851:| 835:| 831:| 827:| 823:| 818:| 814:| 809:| 805:| 789:| 785:| 781:| 777:| 772:| 768:| 763:| 759:| 743:| 739:| 735:| 731:| 726:| 722:| 717:| 713:| 697:| 693:| 689:| 685:| 680:| 676:| 671:| 667:| 651:| 647:| 643:| 639:| 634:| 630:| 625:| 621:| 605:| 601:| 597:| 593:| 588:| 584:| 579:| 575:| 559:| 555:| 551:| 547:| 542:| 538:| 533:| 529:| 513:| 509:| 505:| 501:| 496:| 492:| 487:| 483:| 467:| 463:| 459:| 455:| 450:| 446:| 441:| 437:| 421:| 417:| 413:| 409:| 404:| 400:| 395:| 391:| 375:| 371:| 367:| 363:| 358:| 354:| 349:| 345:| 329:| 325:| 321:| 317:| 312:| 308:| 303:| 299:| 283:| 279:| 275:| 271:| 266:| 262:| 257:| 253:| 237:| 233:| 229:| 225:| 220:| 216:| 211:| 207:| 191:| 187:| 183:| 179:| 174:| 170:| 165:| 161:| 134:| 130:| 126:| 122:| 117:| 113:| 108:| 104:| 58:) 2562:2 2537:( 2515:( 2492:( 2473:( 2406:( 2381:( 2366:( 2348:( 2330:( 2306:( 2280:( 2242:( 2238:. 2210:( 2186:( 2167:/ 2163:/ 2159:/ 2157:c 2155:/ 2153:t 2151:( 2133:( 2116:( 2084:( 2035:( 2021:( 2005:( 1987:( 1945:( 1908:( 1891:( 1834:( 1820:( 1805:( 1785:( 1768:( 1724:( 1706:( 1689:( 1672:( 1647:( 1631:C 1627:/ 1609:C 1605:/ 1582:( 1542:( 1501:( 1483:) 1445:( 1437:) 1399:( 1391:) 1353:( 1345:) 1307:( 1299:) 1261:( 1253:) 1215:( 1207:) 1169:( 1161:) 1123:( 1115:) 1077:( 1069:) 1031:( 1023:) 985:( 977:) 939:( 931:) 893:( 885:) 847:( 839:) 801:( 793:) 755:( 747:) 709:( 701:) 663:( 655:) 617:( 609:) 571:( 563:) 525:( 517:) 479:( 471:) 433:( 425:) 387:( 379:) 341:( 333:) 295:( 287:) 249:( 241:) 203:( 195:) 157:( 150:) 140:( 138:) 100:( 54:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
DGG
talk
00:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Detroit Tigers minor league players
Articles for deletion/Detroit Tigers minor league players
Articles for deletion/Detroit Tigers minor league players (2nd nomination)
Articles for deletion/Detroit Tigers minor league players (3rd nomination)
Detroit Tigers minor league players
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Baltimore Orioles minor league players
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑