338:
much happy until the article had tons of trophys and copyvio images and all glitters. I and few more editors cleaned the resume and in that process added some "negative" aspects to the biography which prominently featured in top google hits about Saraf. Its since then that we have seen sock traffic removing this content. I have lost my access to OTRS for inactivity and wanted to ask
414:
I removed it because it's not really about her and I think that BLP need to be treated with caution. Sorry you've had issues with socks, but in other discussions of BLP where "criminal" issues came up, they were to be treated very carefully. If the consensus is keep that info in, I understand, since
337:
I dont see why so called "criminal" implications should be removed. She was a named accused by SEBI and being founder and what-not of Vu these things should be mentioned. Btw, if you guys have not been through the history then let me put it her that the subject and her paid editors seemed to be very
570:
Brought here by
SwisterTwister's ping, I see no reason to change the rationale I expressed at the first AfD nomination. Like it or loathe it, she passes GNG. I don't recall any objections from the subject in rosier times (ie: before the various recent allegations), although it did appear that there
314:
In addition, I think the article needs to be re-evaluated for the tags on the top of the article. I don't see any evidence of personal research. I've tried to address the copyedit issues and as per BLP I think I'm removing the somewhat "criminal" implication of Vu tech at the bottom.
597:
593:
589:
530:
I believe as the article seems currently convincing but I'm also willing to change if others show and think otherwise as frankly I'm not entirely saying keep. Notifying the only considerably still active 1st AfDers
183:
429:
Fair. The content issue can be discussed on the talk page sometime. But I see no policy based reason from anyone here and as no reason from OTRS can be divulged I see no reason to keep the AfD going.
82:
650:
The subject of the article has requested the article is deleted and the request has been received from an e-mail that can be verified as coming from the person who they claim to be.
259:
136:
177:
473:- the only notability is that she is a woman ("Woman Leadership Award"). Otherwise the person is an average executive. 22:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC) (missed sig:
699:
276:
77:
143:
711:
2010 story. So let's drop the notability issue once and for all, and start getting this article in shape, messy. Those who have time that is. --
448:
361:
396:
Cant advise further other than that they requested it be deleted, they haven't given permission for their specifics to be released.
506:
You are confusing wikipedia and real life. Not to say that I am entitled to my opinion, based on what is written in sources cited.
109:
104:
732:
715:
692:
663:
638:
609:
580:
562:
515:
501:
482:
453:
424:
409:
391:
366:
324:
305:
285:
268:
250:
232:
113:
61:
17:
659:
405:
387:
228:
198:
96:
165:
216:
751:
497:
420:
320:
301:
40:
557:
444:
357:
159:
296:
The article needs copyedit, but the sources are good and I've added a few more. She passes GNG completely.
155:
747:
634:
605:
511:
478:
281:
264:
36:
507:
474:
728:
493:
416:
316:
297:
205:
552:
544:
434:
373:
347:
246:
191:
53:
704:
687:
655:
401:
383:
224:
100:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
746:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
378:
I'll have to chek if we can release that and I'll get back to you when I can advise further.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
645:
630:
601:
576:
540:
723:: being the first nominee myself have seen sources have grown with time , so no doubt KEEP
724:
712:
548:
171:
242:
682:
651:
620:
532:
397:
379:
341:
220:
92:
67:
56:
130:
708:
572:
536:
492:
Response to "unsigned" she's notable for WP:GNG, not because she's a woman CEO.
571:
was some COI editing going on. People can't have it both ways. -
740:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
346:
if the OTRS mentions any reason for deletion of the article. §§
705:
Leading ladies:They're the 25 power women of the country
126:
122:
118:
190:
260:
83:
Articles for deletion/Devita Saraf (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
754:). No further edits should be made to this page.
627:Request from subject article received at OTRS
204:
8:
675:Please refer to my comments at the prior AfD
275:Note: This debate has been included in the
258:Note: This debate has been included in the
277:list of India-related deletion discussions
274:
257:
214:Request from subject article received at
75:
7:
74:
588:This discussion should be closed.
78:Articles for deletion/Devita Saraf
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
677:. I offer the same reluctant
733:12:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
716:06:06, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
693:17:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
664:16:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
639:11:58, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
610:11:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
581:03:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
563:02:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
516:18:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
502:18:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
483:18:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
454:07:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
425:18:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
410:17:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
392:16:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
367:03:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
325:19:17, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
306:18:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
286:17:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
269:17:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
251:16:51, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
233:16:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
62:08:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
771:
743:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
625:What do you mean by
698:Keep: As in prior
452:
365:
288:
271:
762:
745:
690:
685:
649:
624:
560:
555:
442:
377:
355:
345:
284:
267:
241:as not notable.
219:
209:
208:
194:
146:
134:
116:
59:
34:
770:
769:
765:
764:
763:
761:
760:
759:
758:
752:deletion review
741:
688:
683:
643:
618:
558:
553:
494:Megalibrarygirl
417:Megalibrarygirl
371:
339:
317:Megalibrarygirl
298:Megalibrarygirl
280:
263:
215:
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
71:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
768:
766:
757:
756:
736:
735:
718:
695:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
613:
612:
583:
565:
554:SwisterTwister
545:Dharmadhyaksha
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
487:
486:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
437:Dharmadhyaksha
415:it's sourced.
394:
374:Dharmadhyaksha
350:Dharmadhyaksha
330:
329:
328:
327:
309:
308:
290:
289:
272:
254:
253:
212:
211:
148:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
767:
755:
753:
749:
744:
738:
737:
734:
730:
726:
722:
719:
717:
714:
710:
706:
702:
701:
696:
694:
691:
686:
680:
676:
673:
672:
665:
661:
657:
653:
647:
642:
641:
640:
636:
632:
628:
622:
617:
616:
615:
614:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
584:
582:
578:
574:
569:
566:
564:
561:
556:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
529:
525:
524:
517:
513:
509:
505:
504:
503:
499:
495:
491:
490:
489:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
469:
468:
455:
450:
446:
440:
439:
438:
432:
428:
427:
426:
422:
418:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
393:
389:
385:
381:
375:
370:
369:
368:
363:
359:
353:
352:
351:
343:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
326:
322:
318:
313:
312:
311:
310:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
291:
287:
283:
282:North America
278:
273:
270:
266:
265:North America
261:
256:
255:
252:
248:
244:
240:
237:
236:
235:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
742:
739:
720:
697:
678:
674:
626:
585:
567:
527:
470:
436:
435:
430:
349:
348:
293:
238:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
93:Devita Saraf
68:Devita Saraf
49:
47:
31:
28:
709:India Today
646:Marvel Hero
631:Marvel Hero
602:Marvel Hero
586:Strong Keep
541:RegentsPark
508:Staszek Lem
475:Staszek Lem
294:Strong Keep
178:free images
725:Shrikanthv
713:Ekabhishek
549:Ekabhishek
526:Tentative
748:talk page
471:Weak Keep
433:it is. §§
243:Legacypac
54:consensus
37:talk page
750:or in a
652:Amortias
621:Amortias
533:Timtrent
398:Amortias
380:Amortias
342:Amortias
221:Amortias
137:View log
58:Philg88
39:or in a
184:WP refs
172:scholar
110:protect
105:history
689:Faddle
684:Fiddle
573:Sitush
537:Sitush
239:Delete
156:Google
114:delete
52:. Per
449:Edits
362:Edits
199:JSTOR
160:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
729:talk
721:Keep
679:keep
635:talk
606:talk
577:talk
568:Keep
559:talk
547:and
528:Keep
512:talk
498:talk
479:talk
445:Talk
431:Keep
421:talk
358:Talk
321:talk
302:talk
247:talk
217:OTRS
192:FENS
166:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
50:keep
703:: "
700:AFD
551:.
441:§§
354:§§
206:TWL
135:– (
731:)
707:"
681:.
662:)
658:)(
637:)
629:?
608:)
600:.
596:,
592:,
579:)
543:,
539:,
535:,
514:)
500:)
481:)
447:/
423:)
408:)
404:)(
390:)
386:)(
360:/
323:)
304:)
279:.
262:.
249:)
231:)
227:)(
186:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
727:(
660:C
656:T
654:(
648::
644:@
633:(
623::
619:@
604:(
598:3
594:2
590:1
575:(
510:(
496:(
485:)
477:(
451:}
443:{
419:(
406:C
402:T
400:(
388:C
384:T
382:(
376::
372:@
364:}
356:{
344::
340:@
319:(
300:(
245:(
229:C
225:T
223:(
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
140:·
133:)
95:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.