Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Dialga - Knowledge

Source 📝

162:-Yikes, as far as I know the Pokemon franchise is one of the most major and notable videogame-based full media franchises in the history of the industry, and Diamond and Pearl are currently the games in much of that industry's spotlights. Add to that that when the game is released in Japan in a little over a month, Diaruga and Parukia would easily be among the most notable characters especially since they will be on the covers to the game (and being on the cover and representative of the game actually gives them more point than all the other Pokemon creatures), so I think you might not be fully aware of the situation. :( 267:
If Diaruga is nominated for deletion, why not delete every other Diamond and Pearl pokemon while your at it. This is nonsense to nominate a confirmed, and very notable pokemon (Its a lengendary) for deletion. From the information I've seen of Diargua, Diaruga isn't a minor character in the upcoming
210:
All of the characters in the Pokémon series are noteable, and though the article is at this point a stub, it will expand as new information becomes available. Pokémon games and their characters are definitely noteable. This personal vendetta you have is quite bluntly idiotic. Consider that both
406:
nomination: This article may not have much to it now, but that is because it is an article about a future release character. Within about a month, I'm sure that this article will expand and be just as relevent as every other Pokémon article.
180:, sorry but if you nominate one pokemon you might as well nominate all of them. Unless there's something considerably non-notable about this particular one then there isn't really any grounds for deletion.-- 128: 420: 462:. Knowledge is an encyclopedia on every subject, and as long as the article is not nonsensical or about something not notable, it should be kept. -- 390:
the fact that the user also tried to delete Pokémon Diamond and Pearl as well makes me question that this is nomination is in good faith. --
268:
Pokemon games. It's one of the two main lengendary's along with Parukia, like Groudon and Kyogre of the Ruby, Sapphire and Emerald games.
431: 319: 288: 17: 278:
It's on the box art of one of the two DP games. It's a legendary. Even Serebii has it. This seems to be a bad faith nom.
124: 323: 292: 229: 362: 481: 163: 68: 43: 480:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
42:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
238: 463: 449: 23: 92:
Knowledge is not the place to upload information about a minor character in a non-notable videogame.
58: 93: 391: 315: 284: 466: 452: 439: 411: 394: 382: 370: 340: 328: 297: 257: 241: 215: 202: 186: 168: 150: 111: 96: 80: 349: 234: 226: 182: 36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
408: 196: 212: 424: 359: 310: 279: 132: 337: 108: 72: 254: 379: 336:
of course. Horrendously bad faith, this stuff is going to be new every month.
269: 123:
notable fictional character, nomination is from new editor who also nominated
354: 403: 86: 309:
now. I am moving some stuff around to compensate. Please stand by.
253:
of the Pokemon related articles? How about the Pokemon portal? --
474:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
129:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Diamond and Pearl
107:-non-notable? It's Pokemon. Pokemon is very notable. - 249:
as per above. What next, are you going to nominate
46:). No further edits should be made to this page. 484:). No further edits should be made to this page. 348:due to precedent, and dare I say it, passes the 211:Bulbasaur and Torchic are featured articles. 8: 419:Note: This debate has been added to the 24:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Diaruga 7: 378:as per logic and Knowledge policy. 31: 194:per Starblind and precedent. — 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 467:00:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 453:18:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 440:08:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 412:17:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 395:02:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 383:22:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 371:21:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 341:20:51, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 329:20:13, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 298:20:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 258:19:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 242:19:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 216:18:59, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 203:17:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 187:17:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 169:16:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 151:16:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 112:15:38, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 97:15:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 81:06:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 501: 125:Pokémon Diamond and Pearl 477:Please do not modify it. 305:The page is actually at 39:Please do not modify it. 402:: Like I wrote on the 272:19:54, 19 August (UTC) 421:list of CVG deletions 357: 127:for deletion (see 355: 327: 296: 78: 22:(Redirected from 492: 479: 442: 437: 369: 313: 282: 232: 201: 199: 185: 148: 145: 142: 139: 79: 75: 66: 62: 41: 27: 500: 499: 495: 494: 493: 491: 490: 489: 488: 482:deletion review 475: 448:Bad-faith nom. 436: 428: 418: 367: 353: 230: 197: 195: 181: 146: 143: 140: 137: 90: 73: 60: 56: 51:The result was 44:deletion review 37: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 498: 496: 487: 486: 470: 469: 464:67.184.171.198 456: 455: 443: 430: 415: 414: 397: 385: 373: 363: 343: 331: 300: 273: 261: 260: 244: 219: 218: 205: 189: 174: 173: 172: 171: 154: 153: 133:Andrew Lenahan 117: 116: 115: 114: 89: 84: 49: 48: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 497: 485: 483: 478: 472: 471: 468: 465: 461: 458: 457: 454: 451: 450:Ace of Sevens 447: 444: 441: 435: 434: 426: 422: 417: 416: 413: 410: 405: 401: 398: 396: 393: 389: 386: 384: 381: 377: 374: 372: 368: 366: 360: 358: 351: 347: 344: 342: 339: 335: 332: 330: 325: 321: 317: 312: 308: 304: 301: 299: 294: 290: 286: 281: 277: 274: 271: 266: 263: 262: 259: 256: 252: 248: 245: 243: 240: 239: 236: 233: 228: 224: 221: 220: 217: 214: 209: 206: 204: 200: 193: 190: 188: 184: 179: 176: 175: 170: 167: 165: 161: 158: 157: 156: 155: 152: 149: 134: 130: 126: 122: 119: 118: 113: 110: 106: 103: 102: 101: 100: 99: 98: 95: 88: 85: 83: 82: 76: 70: 64: 63: 54: 47: 45: 40: 34: 33: 25: 19: 476: 473: 459: 445: 432: 399: 387: 375: 364: 350:Pokemon test 345: 333: 324:Green Valley 306: 302: 293:Green Valley 275: 264: 250: 246: 237: 222: 207: 191: 177: 166: 159: 136: 120: 104: 91: 59: 52: 50: 38: 35: 446:Speedy keep 409:SaturnYoshi 400:Speedy Keep 388:Speedy Keep 376:Speedy Keep 276:Speedy Keep 247:Speedy Keep 223:Speedy Keep 208:Speedy Keep 198:RevRagnarok 192:Speedy Keep 164:Erik Jensen 121:Speedy Keep 53:speedy keep 225:per Erik. 213:Coltonblue 433:fix me up 425:RandyWang 311:TrackerTV 280:TrackerTV 94:Skarlotte 392:Edgelord 338:Toastypk 320:Castform 289:Castform 109:Sukecchi 303:Comment 255:Robaato 404:Palkia 380:DanPMK 307:Dialga 87:Dialga 270:0-172 183:Andeh 16:< 460:Keep 356:Kinu 352:. -- 346:Keep 334:Keep 265:Keep 235:hway 178:Keep 160:Keep 105:Keep 251:all 144:bli 131:). 438:) 423:. 407:-- 316:CW 285:CW 231:ig 147:nd 141:ar 138:St 135:- 69:tk 65:» 61:ct 55:. 429:/ 427:( 365:c 361:/ 326:) 322:| 318:| 314:( 295:) 291:| 287:| 283:( 227:H 77:) 74:e 71:| 67:( 57:« 26:)

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Diaruga
deletion review
ct
tk
e
06:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Dialga
Skarlotte
15:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Sukecchi
15:38, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Pokémon Diamond and Pearl
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Diamond and Pearl
Andrew Lenahan
16:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Erik Jensen
16:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Andeh
17:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
RevRagnarok
17:48, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Coltonblue
18:59, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
H
ig
hway

19:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Robaato

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.