Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Dipak Nandy - Knowledge

Source 📝

337:. I'd expect more recognition given the nature of the topic for WP notability to be ascertained. Btw, the topic is not really obscure, and has been highly socially relevant for years. This is a possible re-direct, as a section in daughter's WP page - 169: 251: 271:
Nandy was a very notable person in his time, but not many of the relevant sources are on line. I've improved the article, but the most important sources - the National Archives - are not on line.
288:
Notable British political theorist of the '60s. This stuff is fairly obscure, unless you're looking at the UK left wing of the '60s, but he was important within that.
122: 163: 205: 363:
He wrote 7 books and was the subject of two filmed documentaries. He was appointed by the government as an expert on equal opportunities.
129: 95: 90: 17: 99: 184: 151: 82: 204:
to support this article, with 2 of the 3 pages of search results being WordPress websites. He appears to have written
381: 306: 430: 40: 145: 409: 259: 239: 293: 426: 354: 141: 36: 413: 394: 372: 358: 327: 297: 280: 263: 243: 64: 368: 276: 231: 191: 177: 405: 255: 235: 289: 227: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
425:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
350: 86: 364: 272: 157: 342: 318: 55: 219:
and secondary available about him. Article is also in rough shape style/writing wise.
346: 223: 211:, but they do not appear to have many (if any) reviews of a notable nature. There is 391: 216: 201: 116: 341:. Independently, the subject does not seem to pass notability requirements under 78: 70: 338: 208: 421:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
384:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
309:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
252:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
112: 108: 104: 176: 390:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 315:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 433:). No further edits should be made to this page. 250:Note: This discussion has been included in the 190: 8: 249: 404:Seems notable with proper references. 7: 222:Based on this, he does not satisfy 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 234:. Your thoughts are welcome. 450: 373:16:31, 31 March 2018 (UTC) 359:15:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC) 328:18:34, 24 March 2018 (UTC) 298:11:17, 18 March 2018 (UTC) 281:08:14, 18 March 2018 (UTC) 264:04:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC) 244:04:40, 17 March 2018 (UTC) 414:18:09, 6 April 2018 (UTC) 395:06:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC) 65:08:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC) 423:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 200:Little in the way of 397: 330: 326: 266: 63: 441: 389: 387: 385: 325: 323: 316: 314: 312: 310: 195: 194: 180: 132: 120: 102: 62: 60: 53: 34: 449: 448: 444: 443: 442: 440: 439: 438: 437: 431:deletion review 398: 380: 378: 331: 319: 317: 305: 303: 137: 128: 93: 77: 74: 56: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 447: 445: 436: 435: 417: 416: 388: 377: 376: 375: 361: 313: 302: 301: 300: 283: 268: 267: 198: 197: 134: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 446: 434: 432: 428: 424: 419: 418: 415: 411: 407: 406:Expertwikiguy 403: 400: 399: 396: 393: 386: 383: 374: 370: 366: 362: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 333: 332: 329: 324: 322: 311: 308: 299: 295: 291: 287: 284: 282: 278: 274: 270: 269: 265: 261: 257: 256:TheSandDoctor 253: 248: 247: 246: 245: 241: 237: 236:TheSandDoctor 233: 229: 225: 220: 218: 214: 210: 207: 203: 193: 189: 186: 183: 179: 175: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 143: 140: 139:Find sources: 135: 131: 127: 124: 118: 114: 110: 106: 101: 97: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 75: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 422: 420: 401: 379: 334: 320: 304: 290:Andy Dingley 285: 232:WP:NACADEMIC 221: 212: 199: 187: 181: 173: 166: 160: 154: 148: 138: 125: 57: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 351:Eric Yurken 164:free images 79:Dipak Nandy 71:Dipak Nandy 365:Rathfelder 339:Lisa Nandy 321:Sandstein 273:Rathfelder 228:WP:NAUTHOR 58:Sandstein 427:talk page 37:talk page 429:or in a 382:Relisted 307:Relisted 217:reliable 123:View log 39:or in a 392:Spartaz 343:WP:PROF 215:little 170:WP refs 158:scholar 96:protect 91:history 347:WP:BIO 335:Delete 224:WP:GNG 142:Google 100:delete 230:, or 209:books 202:WP:RS 185:JSTOR 146:books 130:Stats 117:views 109:watch 105:links 16:< 410:talk 402:Keep 369:talk 355:talk 294:talk 286:Keep 277:talk 260:talk 240:talk 213:very 178:FENS 152:news 113:logs 87:talk 83:edit 349:.-- 345:or 206:two 192:TWL 121:– ( 412:) 371:) 357:) 296:) 279:) 262:) 254:. 242:) 226:, 172:) 115:| 111:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 52:. 408:( 367:( 353:( 292:( 275:( 258:( 238:( 196:) 188:· 182:· 174:· 167:· 161:· 155:· 149:· 144:( 136:( 133:) 126:· 119:) 81:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Sandstein
08:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Dipak Nandy
Dipak Nandy
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:RS
two
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.