Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Direct Care Group - Knowledge

Source 📝

314:- According to the article, the "company partners with doctors to take ownership of practices" - there must be few if any (none I can think of) instances where a company directly owns a concierge medicine practice. Also added another link (increasing to 3) to demonstrate notability. 14:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 350:
The article appears to be written in a relatively neutral tone and is backed by three independent references. Further supporting notability is the uniqueness of the business in that while physicians, hospitals, or other health care professionals may own and operate traditional medical practices, the
472:
While press releases are not independent, a press release that has been reported on by an independent media source is (even if the press release is copied verbatim), because the information contained in it has passed through independent editorial review. Independent editorial review is the very
452:
Your definition of notability doesn't match Knowledge's: "an organization...is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources". Doesn't say it has to have significant effects on history, technology, or culture.
351:
concept of a non-medical business operating a concierge practice is unique. I'm sure there are operational differences that make this even more unique and I would open this up to more community input rather than a deletion.
157: 488:
Press releases are never considered independent sources, especially if they are copied verbatim by an independent media source. There is no indication that independent media sources fact check press releases.
377:
The website of Society of Direct Care Medicine which is not independent as it clearly states "The Florida Research Partnership (FRP) is a joint effort between the Society and Direct Care Group"
473:
definition of what makes something a third-party source. However, upon closer inspection of Apcovat, it doesn't appear to be professional news anyway, so in this case, the point may be mute.
151: 118: 251: 228: 435:
on history, technology, or culture before becoming an appropriate subject for a stand alone article. No case for long term significance is made here. -
91: 86: 95: 332: 321: 78: 340: 172: 17: 139: 209:- unambiguous advertisement or promotion. No notability and two very thin refs that may be reportage of press releases. 296:
elete. Article claims that the model is unique, yet similar approaches are widespread elsewhere, e.g. here in the UK.
380:
A Forbes article about concierge health care which makes no mention of the Direct Care Group that I was able to find.
370:- No coverage in reliable sources. I don't see three independent references in the article. What I see as of this 519: 133: 523: 558: 36: 557:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
543: 498: 483: 463: 443: 411: 360: 306: 288: 283: 266: 243: 219: 201: 60: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
129: 197: 82: 336: 325: 389:
An American Medical News article about concierge health care that does not mention the Direct Care Group.
179: 74: 66: 531: 356: 317: 278: 165: 535: 490: 301: 193: 398:
So I see nothing in the existing references that support Direct Care Group meeting Knowledge's
145: 383:
A blog post from Redux Group, a business consulting firm does not constitute a reliable source
262: 239: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
277:- I couldn't find anything else aside from those two sources that could support this article. 539: 494: 440: 432: 428: 352: 513: 407: 51: 297: 527: 258: 235: 213: 112: 475: 455: 436: 399: 509: 424: 403: 386:
A press release rehash from Apcovat; press releases aren't independent
551:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
371: 108: 104: 100: 164: 522:)'s analysis of the sources. I have scrolled through 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 561:). No further edits should be made to this page. 526:and have been unable to find any third-party 252:list of Business-related deletion discussions 229:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions 178: 8: 250:Note: This debate has been included in the 227:Note: This debate has been included in the 427:'s categorization of the sources. Because 249: 226: 431:, a business needs to have some sort of 7: 441:killing the human spirit since 2003! 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 544:23:54, 2 September 2011 (UTC) 530:. Because this company fails 499:23:54, 2 September 2011 (UTC) 61:06:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC) 484:03:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC) 464:05:23, 30 August 2011 (UTC) 444:14:56, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 429:notability is not temporary 412:13:55, 29 August 2011 (UTC) 361:17:53, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 307:08:01, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 289:02:49, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 267:23:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 244:23:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC) 220:22:43, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 202:21:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC) 578: 192:. Non-notable company. -- 554:Please do not modify it. 534:, it should be deleted. 32:Please do not modify it. 341:few or no other edits 532:Knowledge:Notability 400:inclusion guidelines 343:outside this topic. 524:Google News Archive 433:significant effects 44:The result was 482: 462: 344: 320:comment added by 304: 269: 255: 246: 232: 75:Direct Care Group 67:Direct Care Group 59: 569: 556: 528:reliable sources 481: 478: 461: 458: 330: 329: 302: 286: 281: 256: 233: 218: 183: 182: 168: 116: 98: 58: 56: 49: 34: 577: 576: 572: 571: 570: 568: 567: 566: 565: 559:deletion review 552: 480: 476: 460: 456: 437:Smerdis of Tlön 315: 284: 279: 210: 125: 89: 73: 70: 52: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 575: 573: 564: 563: 547: 546: 503: 502: 501: 474: 469: 468: 467: 466: 454: 447: 446: 423:. Agree with 417: 416: 415: 414: 393: 392: 391: 390: 387: 384: 381: 378: 364: 363: 345: 309: 291: 280:SwisterTwister 271: 270: 247: 223: 222: 204: 186: 185: 122: 69: 64: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 574: 562: 560: 555: 549: 548: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 518: 515: 511: 507: 504: 500: 496: 492: 487: 486: 485: 479: 471: 470: 465: 459: 451: 450: 449: 448: 445: 442: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 419: 418: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 396: 395: 394: 388: 385: 382: 379: 376: 375: 373: 369: 366: 365: 362: 358: 354: 349: 346: 342: 338: 334: 327: 323: 319: 313: 310: 308: 305: 299: 295: 292: 290: 287: 282: 276: 273: 272: 268: 264: 260: 253: 248: 245: 241: 237: 230: 225: 224: 221: 217: 216: 215: 208: 205: 203: 199: 195: 194:Alan Liefting 191: 188: 187: 181: 177: 174: 171: 167: 163: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 131: 128: 127:Find sources: 123: 120: 114: 110: 106: 102: 97: 93: 88: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71: 68: 65: 63: 62: 57: 55: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 553: 550: 516: 505: 420: 367: 347: 333:98.238.64.56 322:98.238.64.56 316:— Preceding 311: 293: 274: 212: 211: 206: 189: 175: 169: 161: 154: 148: 142: 136: 126: 53: 45: 43: 31: 28: 339:) has made 152:free images 353:BocceBrent 54:Sandstein 259:• Gene93k 236:• Gene93k 520:contribs 318:unsigned 119:View log 372:version 214:Velella 158:WP refs 146:scholar 92:protect 87:history 536:Cunard 506:Delete 491:Cunard 477:ɳorɑfʈ 457:ɳorɑfʈ 421:Delete 368:Delete 275:Delete 207:Delete 190:Delete 130:Google 96:delete 46:delete 402:. -- 374:are: 173:JSTOR 134:books 113:views 105:watch 101:links 16:< 540:talk 514:talk 510:Whpq 508:per 495:talk 425:Whpq 408:talk 404:Whpq 359:) - 357:talk 348:Keep 337:talk 326:talk 312:Keep 303:T@lk 285:talk 263:talk 240:talk 200:) - 198:talk 166:FENS 140:news 109:logs 83:talk 79:edit 298:JFW 180:TWL 117:– ( 542:) 497:) 439:- 410:) 331:— 328:) 300:| 265:) 257:— 254:. 242:) 234:— 231:. 160:) 111:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 94:| 90:| 85:| 81:| 48:. 538:( 517:· 512:( 493:( 406:( 355:( 335:( 324:( 294:D 261:( 238:( 196:( 184:) 176:· 170:· 162:· 155:· 149:· 143:· 137:· 132:( 124:( 121:) 115:) 77:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
 Sandstein 
06:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Direct Care Group
Direct Care Group
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Alan Liefting
talk
21:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Velella
22:43, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.