Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Dirty Sanchez (sexual act) (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

280:
difference between a slang dictionary and an encyclopedia. All of you who voted to keep this nonsense should be thankful to all the Latinos out there who have let this joke continue to exist. If this were called an "African Buttpicker" or a "Dirty Jewboy," or a "Faggot 'Stache," there would be no question about how inappropriate it is. What if this were your name attached to this act? Would you still think it should be included in an encyclopedia? I'm realizing more and more that dicdefs get saved from deletion all the time because they appeal to a certain mindset, and the policy on Knowledge not being a dictionary probably needs to be changed to reflect common practice. Apparently, Knowledge is one of the largest repositories of filthy jokes on the Internet, and editors of Knowledge like it that way. Knowledge is really a bloated and pretentious collection of advertisements, conceits, PR blurbs, wacky politics, ephemera, base perversions, and irrelevant pop culture with frequent delusions of grandeur. This, right here, is the biggest hindrance to Knowledge ever attaining any widespread acceptance, so all of you had better keep it on the QT as long as you can. How are you going to feel when some concerned parents group finds out that Knowledge not only condones, but encourages disgusting shit jokes? How would you feel if you wrote it? I hope you'll be very proud of your work. You have every right to feel special and righteous for letting the truth be told about the Dirty Sanchez. And don't forget the Tossed Salad. Type
367:. All we can do is make it as useful as possible, for now and for the future. I can appreciate what the nominator wants, but it's not consistent with the goals of Knowledge, nor should it be. I hope they'll continue to edit Knowledge though -- like any Internet community, Knowledge has some callow people here and there, and balance is always welcome. 332:
I'm not advocating censorship. I'm arguing my case for deletion because "Dirty Sanchez" is clearly a transwikied dictionary definition, and this is why I feel it must be deleted. Maybe you let my hatred for gratuitous obscenity confuse you before you washed your hands of the matter and decided you
288:
you find out what kind of salad it is! I can imagine there will be a strong unilateral decision made to purge this encyclopedia of ridiculous crap like the Dirty Sanchez when enough concerned parents object. Don't underestimate the ferocity and power of parents who think that their children are in
279:
What's relevant is that this is an example of what Knowledge is not, and all of you who are voting to keep this are either appallingly ignorant of the promulgated deletion policies, too dense to understand them, or don't really know what an encyclopedia is. I'm guessing that you just don't know the
274:
Ruby, you bring up an excellent point that I brought up elsewhere, but didn't include here because it's not something that gets an article deleted on Knowledge. To the contrary, the filthier and more degrading to humanity it is, the more likely it is to stay,
289:
danger. If they can get laws changed to reflect their fears, they can certainly ban Knowledge from school computers. All they have to do is put the fear of God in school superintendents, and things will change. It's only a matter of time.
564: 333:
wouldn't be responsible. It shows a special kind of well-developed hypocrisy to cite Knowledge policy supporting your position while blindingly ignoring the policy about what Knowledge is not.
422:
per precedent and per Adrian's comments. More than just a dicdef. Refer Mr. Crawford to VirginsWithFluffyBunniesWhichReproduceByCleanParthenogenesisPedia.
549:
Offensiveness, racial overtones, or puerile interest are not enough to make something unencyclopedic. Lack of verifiability, distribution or infamy is.
527:
Keep it! Why start censoring everything? Real life isn't always politcally correct. Just because we don't like something doesn't deny it exists.
359:: Things may change, but it won't be because of the nominator, and it won't be today. Until such a time as things *do* change, Knowledge provides a 541: 492: 479: 467: 438: 426: 414: 376: 351: 337: 324: 306: 293: 266: 247: 236: 214: 205: 189: 169: 153: 137: 114: 96: 80: 71: 196:
I'm still not seeing a compelling argument to delete. And while I appreciate the concern, as Latino, I'm totally OK with this article :)
505: 23: 75: 299: 143: 110:, it's verifiable and encyclopedic, and the part about "Dirty Sanchez in pop culture" doesn't belong anywhere but Knowledge. -- 17: 135: 582: 61: 43: 581:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
162: 42:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
501: 409: 372: 201: 185: 334: 302:. Actually if wikipedia was banned from school computers that might solve a lot of our vandalism problems. 290: 93: 446:
Google says 90K hits, which I hope is entirely everyone who could be talked into such a gross activity.
263: 497: 56: 559: 534: 476: 450: 244: 211: 86: 397: 368: 197: 181: 128: 284:
into Knowledge, and you get to find out that it's another phrase for licking someone's asshole
226:
I don't like the idea of indirectly attacking Latinos with scatological articles like this. --
36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
258: 462: 322: 147: 554: 538: 92:
This is a slang dictionary definition that has already been transferred to Wiktionary.
435: 228: 123: 389: 281: 150: 111: 517: 459: 447: 423: 393: 317: 303: 166: 346: 537:
is a bona fide pop culture phenomenon, and it should remain documented.--
363:
strata of knowledge and information, which will never be acceptable to
24:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Dirty Sanchez (sex) second nomination)
345:- Knowledge is not censored, this is a notable term, blah blah blah. 385: 575:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
66: 553:
as this would appear to fall in the latter category. --
300:
wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors
434:
Not the brightest topic in the world, but notable. --
243:
Reasonable Latinos may differ with that, see above.
46:). No further edits should be made to this page. 585:). No further edits should be made to this page. 227: 8: 546:I vote to keep it too, I found it useful. 7: 277:even after it has been transwikied. 516:and make a separate repository of 31: 484:Stop censorship. Keep the page. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 257:, as per Ashenai's reasons. ~ 229: 1: 565:20:16, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 542:08:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC) 480:19:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 468:02:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 439:23:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC) 427:20:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC) 415:16:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 377:04:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 352:02:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 338:01:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 325:01:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 307:00:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 294:23:50, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 267:23:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 248:19:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 237:22:14, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 215:19:33, 22 February 2006 (UTC) 206:04:40, 20 February 2006 (UTC) 190:22:12, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 170:20:06, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 154:19:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 138:18:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 115:16:38, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 97:16:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC) 81:01:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC) 51:The result of the debate was 522:(unsigned comment from anon) 180:, let's not do this again. 602: 578:Please do not modify it. 316:per Ashenai and Kappa. 142:This afd nomination was 39:Please do not modify it. 298:We have a policy that 495:comment was added by 535:Dirty Sanchez (sex) 87:Dirty Sanchez (sex) 232: 509: 475:. per precedent. 413: 230: 146:. Listing now. — 79: 22:(Redirected from 593: 580: 488: 465: 457: 407: 405: 401: 349: 335:BrianGCrawfordMA 320: 291:BrianGCrawfordMA 261: 235: 233: 133: 132: 126: 122:as per above -- 102:Stupidest thing 94:BrianGCrawfordMA 69: 59: 41: 27: 601: 600: 596: 595: 594: 592: 591: 590: 589: 583:deletion review 576: 562: 463: 451: 403: 399: 347: 318: 259: 165:and next time. 130: 129: 124: 90: 65: 44:deletion review 37: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 599: 597: 588: 587: 570: 568: 567: 558: 547: 544: 525: 524: 491:The preceding 486: 485: 482: 477:Carlossuarez46 470: 441: 429: 417: 379: 354: 340: 327: 311: 310: 309: 269: 251: 250: 245:Carlossuarez46 240: 239: 220: 219: 218: 217: 212:Carlossuarez46 193: 192: 172: 156: 140: 117: 89: 84: 49: 48: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 598: 586: 584: 579: 573: 572: 571: 566: 563: 561: 556: 552: 548: 545: 543: 540: 536: 533: 530: 529: 528: 523: 519: 515: 512: 511: 510: 507: 503: 499: 496: 494: 483: 481: 478: 474: 471: 469: 466: 461: 458: 456: 455: 449: 445: 442: 440: 437: 433: 430: 428: 425: 421: 418: 416: 411: 406: 402: 395: 391: 387: 383: 380: 378: 374: 370: 369:Adrian~enwiki 366: 362: 358: 355: 353: 350: 344: 341: 339: 336: 331: 328: 326: 323: 321: 315: 312: 308: 305: 301: 297: 296: 295: 292: 287: 283: 278: 273: 270: 268: 265: 262: 256: 253: 252: 249: 246: 242: 241: 238: 234: 225: 222: 221: 216: 213: 209: 208: 207: 203: 199: 198:Adrian~enwiki 195: 194: 191: 187: 183: 182:Adrian~enwiki 179: 177: 173: 171: 168: 164: 160: 157: 155: 152: 149: 145: 141: 139: 136: 134: 127: 121: 118: 116: 113: 109: 106:. That said, 105: 101: 100: 99: 98: 95: 88: 85: 83: 82: 77: 73: 68: 63: 58: 54: 47: 45: 40: 34: 33: 25: 19: 577: 574: 569: 557: 550: 531: 526: 521: 520:references. 513: 498:71.131.70.51 490: 487: 472: 453: 452: 443: 431: 419: 398: 390:donkey punch 384:per AfDs on 381: 364: 360: 356: 342: 329: 313: 285: 282:Tossed salad 276: 271: 254: 223: 175: 174: 158: 119: 107: 103: 91: 52: 50: 38: 35: 518:pop culture 394:teabagging 361:very broad 151:(operator) 148:Crypticbot 539:Ktwombley 348:Cyde Weys 210:As am I. 163:last time 555:nae'blis 506:contribs 493:unsigned 436:Depakote 404:american 365:everyone 330:Comment. 272:Comment. 144:orphaned 125:getcrunk 396:, etc. 357:Comment 161:, like 112:Ashenai 560:(talk) 286:before 260:Apollo 224:Delete 176:Speedy 57:Ichiro 514:Keeep 424:Barno 400:young 386:taint 319:dbtfz 304:Kappa 264:Creed 167:Kappa 131:juice 16:< 551:Keep 532:Keep 502:talk 473:Keep 444:Keep 432:Keep 420:Keep 410:talk 382:Keep 373:talk 343:Keep 314:Keep 255:Keep 231:Ruby 202:talk 186:talk 178:keep 159:Keep 120:Keep 108:keep 104:ever 72:投稿記録 53:keep 508:) . 460:nni 76:メール 504:• 392:, 388:, 375:) 204:) 188:) 62:会話 55:. 500:( 489:— 464:☯ 454:e 448:D 412:) 408:( 371:( 200:( 184:( 78:) 74:| 70:| 67:+ 64:| 60:( 26:)

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Dirty Sanchez (sex) second nomination)
deletion review
Ichiro
会話
+
投稿記録
メール
01:06, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Dirty Sanchez (sex)
BrianGCrawfordMA
16:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Ashenai
16:38, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
getcrunk
juice

18:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
orphaned
Crypticbot
(operator)
19:43, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
last time
Kappa
20:06, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Adrian~enwiki
talk
22:12, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Adrian~enwiki
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.