Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/E-Science City - Knowledge

Source 📝

436:
procedures adding an article to WP on each projected project despite the fact that its own participants are the only people who even know of its existence yet. There are plenty of other sources of institutional blather -- US education is another -- but they don't make a habit of spamming WP on such a regular basis. OK?
435:
Pardon me, but I have no animosity toward the EU -- I think European unification is a great thing, and the EU -- imperfect though it may be -- is the embodiment of that. What I don't like is, as I said, "the EU's randomly-generated-word-salad grant mill", which seems to have as a formal step of its
384:, of which this project is a part. Most of the content of this "City" article is already in the "Talk" article. I don't find evidence that the "City" project is sufficiently independent of "Talk" to have a separate article, much less notable independent of the parent. -- 198:
Non-notable short-term funded EU project. Many references, hardly any of which mention the subject by name and those that do are either not independent or only contain a blurb with no in-depth coverage. We have a long history of deleting such projects at AfD, see
167: 216: 280: 122: 204: 306: 200: 161: 258: 236: 208: 127: 212: 95: 90: 99: 82: 17: 182: 149: 544: 40: 143: 344: 314: 517: 500: 479: 462: 445: 426: 393: 372: 351: 318: 294: 272: 250: 228: 139: 64: 224: 86: 540: 488: 406: 310: 60: 36: 189: 78: 70: 470:
Yes it is: Predictions of future goings-on no one's yet written anything about don't belong in WP.
381: 175: 51: 339: 496: 458: 422: 290: 268: 246: 220: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
539:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
508:
Um, yes, but as stated repeatedly that was never any part of my rationale. Can we stop now?
389: 328: 155: 56: 513: 475: 441: 368: 410: 492: 454: 418: 286: 264: 242: 116: 402: 385: 331:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
509: 471: 437: 414: 364: 363:
More blather from the EU's randomly-generated-word-salad grant mill.
533:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
417:
doesn't seem to like the EU is not a reason to delete. --
112: 108: 104: 174: 217:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Pol-primett (project)
338:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
205:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/PARSIFAL Project EU
281:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions 213:Knowledge talk:Articles for creation/Scape project 201:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/COMET (EU project) 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 547:). No further edits should be made to this page. 453:: Ok. That is still not grounds for deletion -- 259:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 55:. Page history preserved for a possible Merge 307:ephemeral EU project trying to promote itself 188: 8: 279:Note: This debate has been included in the 257:Note: This debate has been included in the 235:Note: This debate has been included in the 237:list of Europe-related deletion discussions 278: 256: 234: 209:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Inter2Geo 506:Comment on Comment on Comment on Comment 7: 405:. Note: I see no hard evidence of 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 518:15:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 501:06:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 65:20:09, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 1: 480:22:45, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 463:20:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 446:15:27, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 427:11:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 394:17:05, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 373:18:40, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 352:17:21, 7 September 2012 (UTC) 319:13:07, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 295:00:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 273:00:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 251:00:37, 1 September 2012 (UTC) 229:17:48, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 564: 536:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 413:. And the fact that 487:: Undoubtedly. But 468:Comment on Comment 378:Merge and redirect 48:The result was 354: 297: 284: 275: 262: 253: 240: 555: 538: 349: 342: 337: 333: 285: 263: 241: 193: 192: 178: 130: 120: 102: 34: 563: 562: 558: 557: 556: 554: 553: 552: 551: 545:deletion review 534: 350: 347: 340: 326: 135: 126: 93: 77: 74: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 561: 559: 550: 549: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 489:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 430: 429: 409:accusation of 407:Guillaume2303s 396: 375: 357: 356: 355: 348:Limited Access 346: 335: 334: 323: 322: 321: 299: 298: 276: 254: 196: 195: 132: 79:E-Science City 73: 71:E-Science City 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 560: 548: 546: 542: 537: 531: 519: 515: 511: 507: 504: 503: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 483: 482: 481: 477: 473: 469: 466: 465: 464: 460: 456: 452: 449: 448: 447: 443: 439: 434: 433: 432: 431: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 397: 395: 391: 387: 383: 382:E-ScienceTalk 379: 376: 374: 370: 366: 362: 359: 358: 353: 345: 343: 336: 332: 330: 325: 324: 320: 316: 312: 311:Guillaume2303 308: 304: 301: 300: 296: 292: 288: 282: 277: 274: 270: 266: 260: 255: 252: 248: 244: 238: 233: 232: 231: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 191: 187: 184: 181: 177: 173: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137:Find sources: 133: 129: 124: 118: 114: 110: 106: 101: 97: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 75: 72: 69: 67: 66: 62: 58: 54: 53: 52:E-ScienceTalk 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 535: 532: 505: 484: 467: 450: 398: 377: 360: 327: 305:Yet another 302: 221:Stuartyeates 197: 185: 179: 171: 164: 158: 152: 146: 136: 50:redirect to 49: 47: 31: 28: 162:free images 57:Mark Arsten 491:is not -- 341:cyberpower 541:talk page 287:• Gene93k 265:• Gene93k 243:• Gene93k 37:talk page 543:or in a 329:Relisted 123:View log 39:or in a 493:BenTels 485:Comment 455:BenTels 451:Comment 419:BenTels 219:, etc. 168:WP refs 156:scholar 96:protect 91:history 411:WP:COI 403:Orlady 401:: per 386:Orlady 361:Delete 303:Delete 140:Google 100:delete 399:Merge 183:JSTOR 144:books 128:Stats 117:views 109:watch 105:links 16:< 514:talk 510:EEng 497:talk 476:talk 472:EEng 459:talk 442:talk 438:EEng 423:talk 415:EEng 390:talk 369:talk 365:EEng 315:talk 309:. -- 291:talk 269:talk 247:talk 225:talk 176:FENS 150:news 113:logs 87:talk 83:edit 61:talk 380:to 190:TWL 125:• 121:– ( 516:) 499:) 478:) 461:) 444:) 425:) 392:) 371:) 317:) 293:) 283:. 271:) 261:. 249:) 239:. 227:) 215:, 211:, 207:, 203:, 170:) 115:| 111:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 63:) 512:( 495:( 474:( 457:( 440:( 421:( 388:( 367:( 313:( 289:( 267:( 245:( 223:( 194:) 186:· 180:· 172:· 165:· 159:· 153:· 147:· 142:( 134:( 131:) 119:) 81:( 59:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
E-ScienceTalk
Mark Arsten
talk
20:09, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
E-Science City
E-Science City
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/COMET (EU project)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.