389:
412:. The poor English and incomplete listing are page quality issues which there is no deadline to fix and the article is eminently savable. This is not a TNT case. The number of earthquakes that occur in Haryana (dozens of recorded ones over the years reported in reliable sources) clearly justifies a separate listing to
606:
It was not clear if this was supposed to be a list of notable earthquakes in
Haryana (in which case renaming and expansion are warranted) or an article only about four small earthquakes in May 2020 (for which I could not find sources to demonstrate notability). I am very well aware that poor writing
358:
is an administrative area of India "carved out on a linguistic basis". Earthquake occurrence is unrelated to either administration or linguistics. It is not therefore a coherent topic, and to edit the article into correctly written
English would probably not leave three consecutive words unchanged.
276:
in that there is no lasting impact of these earthquakes, coverage is not lasting (only a few trivial mentions), and predicting future earthquakes (such as a "big one" after these "foreshocks") is impossible. Unless there is evidence of lasting impact or notability, these earthquakes do not seem to
498:
and rename, per FOARP. The argument in the first comment about
Haryana being carved out linguistically is nonsensical - how were the borders of California decided, and why does it matter? If a given state in a given country is earthquake-prone to the point of receiving media coverage about it, it
625:
supporting turning this into a list article. The sources that have been unearthed show this can be a viable article as is. The only name change I would support is changing to plural "earthquakes". It clearly is about more than "four small earthquakes in May 2020"; the page at the time it was
589:
these earthquakes belong to – if you can source it. That these earthquakes are small is also not a policy based argument. Small != unnotable. Since multiple researchers have studied them in depth and published their work in reliable sources then, on the contrary and by definition, they are
584:
suitable for an article. Editors arguing that earthquake occurence is unrelated to politcal/linguistic boundaries are promoting an argument not supported in policy and expert sources don't seem to agree. In any case, that is an argument for renaming, not for deleting. Rename it after the
256:
It's not completely clear what the topic is: a history/list of earthquakes in
Haryana or specifically the earthquakes of May 2020. I'm having trouble deciphering what's written and the topic—but of course, difficulty reading is not a criterion for deletion, and it's clearly not A1 or G1.
384:, though I favour keep/rename over this). The article is a clearly a list as can be seen from the table. Haryana is an Indian *state*, just like California is a state of the United States. Whilst "other things exist" is not a great argument, it is still instructive to ask if
268:(see the sentence mentioning 47 mm/year, that's identical)—that is, if these earthquakes would otherwise be included in that list—but based on what is included there, they don't seem significant enough for that. In the latter case, it fails
225:
590:
actually notable. Poor
English is also not usually a good reason for deletion. Virtually every article that comes out of India is written in poor English, so suck it up and get copyediting.
388:
That it was carved out of another state in 1966 based on who spoke what language where is neither here nor there - it is a coherent geographical entity where earthquakes frequently occur (
784:. The 1956 earthquake mentioned in the article (M7?) is also almost certainly notable as it killed people in Dehli, but sources for that one will take more effort because of the age.
219:
334:
178:
782:
314:
670:
563:
states that quakes in the 2.0-2.9 range are "felt slightly by some people. No damage to buildings" and there are "over one million per year" across the globe.
650:
294:
776:
402:
125:
110:
151:
146:
155:
185:
778:
393:
138:
396:
70:
405:
780:
773:. Even if that wasn't the case, there have been notable earthquakes in Haryana; there was a widely covered M4.6 as recently as May
385:
240:
207:
774:
75:
399:
607:
is not a deletion rationale, but I cannot copyedit unless the intended meaning is clear; otherwise, I risk a misunderstanding.
105:
98:
17:
580:. FOARP provided three scholarly papers studing earthquakes in Haryana. That makes the topic notable by our definition and
377:
55:
621:
Of course that's not true. Focus of the article is an entirely different issue to copyediting
English. To be clear, I am
552:
556:
508:
500:
413:
265:
201:
119:
115:
769:
This is not a list article. Even if it was, lists in which no individual entry is notable are explicitly allowed by
795:
764:
737:
706:
682:
662:
637:
616:
601:
572:
541:
511:
484:
450:
429:
368:
343:
326:
306:
286:
80:
520:
142:
197:
814:
612:
322:
302:
282:
40:
65:
247:
790:
678:
658:
632:
596:
560:
504:
364:
568:
810:
758:
339:
269:
261:
134:
86:
36:
466:
608:
318:
298:
278:
233:
213:
60:
785:
674:
654:
627:
591:
472:
461:
This doesn't matter as the subject is a list, not an event-article per se. The relevant guide is
360:
694:
564:
559:
is quite sufficient. The 4.6 earthquake could be added to that list. The other three are 2's;
469:
438:
94:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
809:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
465:. Earthquakes in Haryana have been studied and listed in scholarly articles including, e.g.,
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
751:
715:
702:
446:
273:
52:. However, there is consensus that it should not be kept in its current form, so it will be
480:
462:
425:
409:
532:
770:
386:
anyone thinks it inappropriate to have an article listing earthquakes in
California?
172:
746:
698:
442:
476:
421:
697:. None of these earthquakes meet the notability for a natural disaster.
586:
381:
355:
714:
Perfectly valid list article for reasons others already pointed out.
499:
makes obvious sense to retain the article as a spin-off of the main
551:. These are all pretty weak earthquakes. (Or alternatively, rename
805:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
420:
earthquakes (not all earthquakes covered in reliable sources).
523:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
168:
164:
160:
232:
745:
Not a single name in this article's list would meet
529:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
817:). No further edits should be made to this page.
669:Note: This discussion has been included in the
649:Note: This discussion has been included in the
626:nominated refers to a large earthquake in 1956.
335:list of Environment-related deletion discussions
333:Note: This discussion has been included in the
313:Note: This discussion has been included in the
293:Note: This discussion has been included in the
441:. The events only attracted one-off coverage.
246:
8:
315:list of Science-related deletion discussions
126:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
671:list of Events-related deletion discussions
668:
651:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
648:
332:
312:
295:list of India-related deletion discussions
292:
553:List of minor land hiccups in Haryana
7:
416:which is anyway only a listing of
24:
111:Introduction to deletion process
277:pass the notability threshold.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
378:List of earthquakes in Haryana
56:List of earthquakes in Haryana
1:
557:List of earthquakes in India
501:List of earthquakes in India
414:List of earthquakes in India
359:So there is no value in it.
266:List of earthquakes in India
380:(or alternatively merge to
260:If it's the former, it's a
101:(AfD)? Read these primers!
834:
264:of some of the content in
738:06:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
707:02:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
683:00:20, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
663:00:20, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
638:19:00, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
617:18:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
602:17:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
573:07:45, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
542:06:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
512:05:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
485:17:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
451:19:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
430:07:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
369:06:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
344:05:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
327:03:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
307:01:15, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
287:01:15, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
807:Please do not modify it.
796:10:03, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
765:04:00, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
408:and is an easy pass for
81:22:19, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
561:Richter magnitude scale
135:Earthquake in Haryana
99:Articles for deletion
87:Earthquake in Haryana
390:including one today
685:
665:
544:
540:
382:Haryana#Geography
346:
329:
309:
116:Guide to deletion
106:How to contribute
825:
763:
761:
756:
734:
731:
728:
725:
722:
719:
539:
537:
530:
528:
526:
524:
342:
251:
250:
236:
188:
176:
158:
96:
34:
833:
832:
828:
827:
826:
824:
823:
822:
821:
815:deletion review
759:
752:
750:
732:
729:
726:
723:
720:
717:
609:ComplexRational
545:
533:
531:
519:
517:
338:
319:Robert McClenon
299:ComplexRational
279:ComplexRational
193:
184:
149:
133:
130:
93:
90:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
831:
829:
820:
819:
801:
800:
799:
798:
740:
709:
687:
686:
666:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
575:
527:
516:
515:
514:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
454:
453:
432:
392:) and receive
376:and rename to
371:
348:
347:
330:
310:
270:WP:NEARTHQUAKE
262:WP:CONTENTFORK
254:
253:
190:
129:
128:
123:
113:
108:
91:
89:
84:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
830:
818:
816:
812:
808:
803:
802:
797:
794:
793:
789:
788:
783:
781:
779:
777:
775:
772:
768:
767:
766:
762:
757:
755:
748:
744:
741:
739:
736:
735:
713:
710:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
689:
688:
684:
680:
676:
675:Coolabahapple
672:
667:
664:
660:
656:
655:Coolabahapple
652:
647:
646:
639:
636:
635:
631:
630:
624:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
605:
604:
603:
600:
599:
595:
594:
588:
583:
579:
576:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
547:
546:
543:
538:
536:
525:
522:
513:
510:
506:
502:
497:
494:
493:
486:
482:
478:
474:
471:
468:
464:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
433:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
404:
401:
398:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
372:
370:
366:
362:
361:Imaginatorium
357:
353:
350:
349:
345:
341:
340:North America
336:
331:
328:
324:
320:
316:
311:
308:
304:
300:
296:
291:
290:
289:
288:
284:
280:
275:
271:
267:
263:
258:
249:
245:
242:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
199:
196:
195:Find sources:
191:
187:
183:
180:
174:
170:
166:
162:
157:
153:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
131:
127:
124:
121:
117:
114:
112:
109:
107:
104:
103:
102:
100:
95:
88:
85:
83:
82:
79:
78:
74:
73:
69:
68:
64:
63:
58:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
806:
804:
791:
786:
753:
742:
716:
711:
690:
633:
628:
622:
597:
592:
581:
577:
565:Clarityfiend
548:
534:
518:
495:
434:
417:
373:
351:
259:
255:
243:
237:
229:
222:
216:
210:
204:
194:
181:
92:
76:
71:
66:
61:
53:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
582:prima facie
394:significant
220:free images
695:WP:NOTNEWS
535:Sandstein
503:article. ♠
439:WP:NOTNEWS
811:talk page
274:WP:NEVENT
62:King of ♥
54:moved to
37:talk page
813:or in a
787:Spinning
629:Spinning
593:Spinning
521:Relisted
463:WP:LISTN
410:WP:LISTN
403:reliable
397:coverage
179:View log
120:glossary
39:or in a
587:orogeny
406:sources
356:Haryana
226:WP refs
214:scholar
152:protect
147:history
97:New to
771:WP:CSC
754:killer
743:Delete
699:Ajf773
691:Delete
549:Delete
509:(talk)
443:desmay
435:Delete
352:Delete
198:Google
156:delete
792:Spark
733:Focus
634:Spark
598:Spark
477:FOARP
422:FOARP
418:major
241:JSTOR
202:books
186:Stats
173:views
165:watch
161:links
16:<
747:WP:N
712:KEEP
703:talk
693:per
679:talk
659:talk
613:talk
578:Keep
569:talk
496:Keep
481:talk
447:talk
437:per
426:talk
374:Keep
365:talk
323:talk
303:talk
283:talk
272:and
234:FENS
208:news
169:logs
143:talk
139:edit
760:bee
623:not
555:.)
505:PMC
248:TWL
177:– (
749:.
705:)
681:)
673:.
661:)
653:.
615:)
571:)
507:♠
483:)
475:.
449:)
428:)
400:in
367:)
354::
337:.
325:)
317:.
305:)
297:.
285:)
228:)
171:|
167:|
163:|
159:|
154:|
150:|
145:|
141:|
59:.
730:m
727:a
724:e
721:r
718:D
701:(
677:(
657:(
611:(
567:(
479:(
473:3
470:2
467:1
445:(
424:(
363:(
321:(
301:(
281:(
252:)
244:·
238:·
230:·
223:·
217:·
211:·
205:·
200:(
192:(
189:)
182:·
175:)
137:(
122:)
118:(
77:♠
72:♣
67:♦
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.