330:'Interesting' is very much in the eye of the beholder. I find that the endless list of ancient hymns, as well as Every Air Crash In The World, that some people write about (and that regularely decorate the front page) deeply uninteresting. But i will not suggest any of that for deletion, no matter how boring i find it, because i know that for somebody else, this is the most interesting thing in the world...
325:
Yes, they are not interesting. Yes, it is difficult to find reliable information. And yes, this is exactly the same problem if we want to find out how ordinary people lived, worked and died in medievil days. It is completely documented to the smallest detail how the noblesse were doing, but find info
322:
Most people did (and do) not have Leica's, Hasselblad, Contax' and other wonderful cameras. The blurred pics from somebody's vacation, the newborn baby, the long-dead grandma... most ordinary people's "Kodak moment" has happened with plain, unassuming and poor cameras. The pictures have been badly
219:
Even if so - there has still been made about 128.000 of these rather poor cameras, and there is hardly any information on the
Internet about them. So where else are people going to find data? Anybody unhappy with the contents? Feel free to edit! :)
352:- If your concern is keeping this information somewhere, there are lots of alternatives to Knowledge. There are a multitude of places to create a free web site. There is also Wikia where somebody has created
161:
52:. No assertion or evidence of notability. We don't have articles on everything - our inclusion crieria is that something needs to be "notable". That there is no information available is why we delete articles.
320:
I collect cameras, and for me, this camera is interesting. Not for extraordinary craftmanship, interesting production, technological achievements etc., but for the extraordinary... plainness.
256:. Just because there seems to be few/no other internet-based sources of info on this product doesn't mean that WP has to carry a torch for it. Product is of questionable notability.
122:
274:
155:
196:. Non-notable product. The article states "It is difficult to find redeeming qualities in this camera." This about sums up the reason for the AfD! --
235:
WP has notability guidelines to restrict the articles to a certain subset of "the sum of human knowledge" to make the project more managable. --
215:. Since when has something needed to be 'notable' to be included in an encyclopedia? Half of Knowledge would disappear, if that was a criteria...
328:
That is why i find this cheap, old, USSR P.O.S. interesting. And i don't know where else to preserve the poor scraps of information about it.
95:
90:
17:
99:
176:
143:
82:
410:
40:
323:
exposed, and rarely very artful. But it is these plain, ignored cameras, that filled most people's photo albums.
137:
261:
240:
201:
406:
133:
36:
391:
365:
341:
308:
299:- I can find no significant coverage about this entry level camera in independent reliable sources. --
288:
265:
244:
229:
205:
64:
86:
337:
225:
183:
169:
257:
253:
236:
197:
78:
70:
61:
284:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
405:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
332:
I better shut up now. I've said more than my part. Thanks for reading, and God bless y'all!
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
387:
149:
361:
333:
304:
221:
379:. I've added a couple of refs, and suspect there are further ones available offline.
376:
54:
280:
116:
382:
357:
300:
353:
399:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
315:
Hm. Looks like i'm a minority here... May i please explain?
356:
which sounds like a spot that you may want to consider. --
112:
108:
104:
168:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
413:). No further edits should be made to this page.
275:list of Photography-related deletion discussions
182:
8:
273:Note: This debate has been included in the
326:on the guy tending the stables? Impossible.
272:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
392:04:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
366:16:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
342:16:01, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
309:17:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
289:02:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
266:22:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
245:20:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
230:19:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
206:18:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
65:12:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
430:
402:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
48:The result was
291:
278:
421:
404:
385:
279:
187:
186:
172:
120:
102:
57:
34:
429:
428:
424:
423:
422:
420:
419:
418:
417:
411:deletion review
400:
380:
375:Probably meets
129:
93:
77:
74:
55:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
427:
425:
416:
415:
395:
394:
370:
369:
368:
331:
329:
327:
324:
321:
318:
317:
316:
312:
311:
293:
292:
269:
268:
247:
217:
216:
209:
208:
190:
189:
126:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
426:
414:
412:
408:
403:
397:
396:
393:
389:
384:
378:
374:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
339:
335:
314:
313:
310:
306:
302:
298:
295:
294:
290:
286:
282:
276:
271:
270:
267:
263:
259:
258:Eddie.willers
255:
254:Alan Liefting
251:
248:
246:
242:
238:
237:Alan Liefting
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
214:
211:
210:
207:
203:
199:
198:Alan Liefting
195:
192:
191:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
401:
398:
372:
349:
319:
296:
249:
218:
212:
193:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
60:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
354:Camerapedia
156:free images
79:Elikon-35CM
71:Elikon-35CM
407:talk page
334:Kim_Pirat
281:• Gene93k
222:Kim_Pirat
37:talk page
409:or in a
123:View log
56:SilkTork
39:or in a
350:Comment
252:as per
162:WP refs
150:scholar
96:protect
91:history
377:WP:GNG
297:Delete
250:Delete
194:Delete
134:Google
100:delete
50:delete
383:Trevj
177:JSTOR
138:books
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
388:talk
373:Keep
362:talk
358:Whpq
338:talk
305:talk
301:Whpq
285:talk
262:talk
243:) -
241:talk
226:talk
213:Keep
204:) -
202:talk
170:FENS
144:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
381:--
184:TWL
121:– (
390:)
364:)
340:)
307:)
287:)
277:.
264:)
228:)
164:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
386:(
360:(
336:(
303:(
283:(
260:(
239:(
224:(
200:(
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.