201:
Seems to be a new social networking website with limited reliable sources detailing it. The tone of the article is obviously promotional but that can be fixed through the course of normal editing. What cannot be fixed is the lack of sourcing.
170:
131:
164:
286:
64:
104:
99:
57:
EDIT: Not enough time was given to allow original creator/subsequent editors to add credible third-party sources. Please reconsider.
224:, some press releases and self-praise, a review on a glorified blog calling itself a magazine, and another review on a tech blog. --
108:
91:
17:
185:
152:
258:
348:
316:
to stimulate traffic, and although the tone could be fixed, the site is too new to have accumulated any in-depth
36:
146:
347:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
68:
333:
301:
277:
260:
236:
211:
142:
72:
52:
95:
273:
192:
231:
60:
87:
79:
178:
329:
297:
207:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
269:
253:
158:
220:- unless solid sources are suddenly found. What we've got is a single-screen review on the
225:
49:
321:
313:
245:
325:
317:
293:
203:
125:
248:
312:- per nominator and OrangeMike. Article was obviously created by a
341:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
268:
not encyclopedic, not real references mostly primary references
121:
117:
113:
177:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
351:). No further edits should be made to this page.
287:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
191:
8:
285:Note: This debate has been included in the
284:
322:criteria for websites and organisations
7:
244:Lacks significant coverage so fails
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
73:08:44, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
53:19:15, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
334:01:32, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
302:23:35, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
278:14:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
261:07:56, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
237:23:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
212:21:58, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
368:
344:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
314:single purpose account
44:The result was
304:
290:
63:comment added by
359:
346:
318:reliable sources
291:
256:
251:
234:
228:
196:
195:
181:
129:
111:
75:
34:
367:
366:
362:
361:
360:
358:
357:
356:
355:
349:deletion review
342:
326:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
254:
249:
232:
226:
138:
102:
86:
83:
58:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
365:
363:
354:
353:
337:
336:
306:
305:
281:
280:
263:
239:
199:
198:
135:
88:Folkdirect.com
82:
80:Folkdirect.com
77:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
364:
352:
350:
345:
339:
338:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
307:
303:
299:
295:
288:
283:
282:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
262:
259:
257:
252:
247:
243:
240:
238:
235:
229:
223:
219:
216:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
133:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
106:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
76:
74:
70:
66:
65:90.178.66.175
62:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
343:
340:
309:
265:
241:
221:
217:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
59:— Preceding
56:
45:
43:
31:
28:
270:CapMan07008
227:Orange Mike
218:Weak delete
165:free images
320:and fails
50:Courcelles
294:• Gene93k
222:HuffPost
132:View log
61:unsigned
204:Protonk
171:WP refs
159:scholar
105:protect
100:history
310:Delete
266:Delete
246:WP:GNG
242:Delete
143:Google
109:delete
46:delete
186:JSTOR
147:books
126:views
118:watch
114:links
16:<
330:talk
298:talk
274:talk
255:king
233:Talk
208:talk
179:FENS
153:news
122:logs
96:talk
92:edit
69:talk
230:|
193:TWL
130:– (
332:)
324:.
300:)
292:—
289:.
276:)
250:Mt
210:)
173:)
124:|
120:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
71:)
48:.
328:(
296:(
272:(
206:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
128:)
90:(
67:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.