493:
I'm thankful that (1) You've considered my point about GNG being attainable on one source too, as per guidelines (2) You've also now perchance considered all the sources. As much as I see, the objection you have is that you feel the content within the multiple sources provided is not enough. I do
330:
536:
and obviously promotional. (the last sentence is laughable: "Forefront is notable for their use of livestream, hangouts, meetups, tweet chats and other real time events to showcase their partners" Oh! They use social media!! How strange and exciting !!!!! blech.)
324:
can be attained even with one source; the GNG guideline itself specifies that there is no actual number of sources specified, while multiple sources are preferred. Two sources do make multiple sources, although there are other sources too, like
430:
is nothing more than that, but it seems as though it is a moderately reliable source at best, and at worst a PR-vulnerable outlet. I think other opinions are needed here to sort out whether
Forefront.tv meets GNG. My opinion is that is it
457:
That's why I said that even a single source, for example the
Variety source, is enough. In this particular case, we have four sources from three reliable outlets that cover the media company significantly. Thanks.
165:
332:). At the same time, allow me to enquire, why do you think the NewMediaRockStars source is unreliable? It's a site that is approached by the likes of The New York Times for inputs on web based news.
278:
cannot be ignored. If you don't mind, please do take my suggestion and check our notability guidelines and do a cursory check for sources before you nominate. Talk me up for any help you may need.
455:"In the absence of multiple sources, it must be possible to verify that the source reflects a neutral point of view, is credible and provides sufficient detail for a comprehensive article."
118:
362:
159:
393:
532:
and GNG which says topics need substantial discussion in multiple reliable sources. This article is sourced to a Vanity Fair blog posting and some trade rags.
411:
380:
239:(Giving credence to Jytdog's comments, and to the additional comments provided by Delta, while I'm sustaining the statement made, I'm striking the Keep !vote.
269:
336:
578:
125:
259:
326:
196:
Non-notable "premium video content" website. Looks like an advertisement rather than an encyclopedic article. Does not pass GNG.
91:
86:
426:
GNG specifically mentions "sources," which implies that no single source can establish notability alone. Perhaps my hunch about
95:
17:
180:
477:
can establish notability alone. The other sources helps, but I don't see the amount of coverage I'd consider significant.
78:
147:
333:
555:
213:
622:
40:
573:
298:: If those are the only sources available, then I do not think the subject passes GNG. I'm also concerned that
141:
137:
618:
603:
599:
584:
546:
529:
506:
486:
466:
444:
416:
385:
351:
311:
286:
228:
224:
205:
60:
36:
82:
187:
568:
565:
478:
436:
303:
197:
173:
74:
66:
482:
440:
307:
264:
201:
533:
499:
495:
459:
432:
344:
340:
279:
274:
240:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
617:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
595:
542:
153:
321:
255:
54:
112:
538:
329:
by Rap
Basement (Rap Basement's been voted VH1's Best Hip-Hop Lifestyle Site)
498:); I'll await comments from other editors on their interpretation. Thanks.
494:
disagree with the viewpoint (as I believe the coverage easily satisfies
453:
Sure. It's interesting that the GNG guidelines notes the following:
339:
about
Forefront.tv from the editor. Also, what are your views on
611:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
558:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
216:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
108:
104:
100:
172:
564:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
473:I just do not see how a single 295-word article in
258:. Significant reviews focused on forefront.tv like
222:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
625:). No further edits should be made to this page.
363:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
394:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
186:
8:
392:Note: This debate has been included in the
361:Note: This debate has been included in the
391:
360:
454:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
247:02:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC))
604:06:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
585:07:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
61:03:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
547:22:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
507:18:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
487:15:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
467:14:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
445:10:31, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
417:09:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
386:09:20, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
352:09:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
312:09:15, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
287:04:48, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
229:01:38, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
206:10:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
642:
302:is not a reliable source.
335:For information, there's
614:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
428:New Media Rock Stars
300:New Media Rock Stars
594:as corporate spam.
253:
587:
419:
415:
412:(Follow my trail)
388:
384:
381:(Follow my trail)
275:NewMediaRockstars
249:
248:
231:
633:
616:
581:
576:
571:
563:
561:
559:
504:
464:
409:
407:
401:
378:
376:
370:
349:
284:
245:
238:
227:
221:
219:
217:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
57:
34:
641:
640:
636:
635:
634:
632:
631:
630:
629:
623:deletion review
612:
588:
579:
574:
569:
554:
552:
500:
460:
414:
405:
397:
383:
374:
366:
345:
337:one more source
280:
241:
232:
223:
212:
210:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
639:
637:
628:
627:
607:
606:
562:
551:
550:
549:
530:WP:Golden rule
522:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
490:
489:
448:
447:
410:
389:
379:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
315:
314:
290:
289:
220:
209:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
638:
626:
624:
620:
615:
609:
608:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
589:
586:
582:
577:
572:
567:
560:
557:
548:
544:
540:
535:
531:
527:
524:
523:
508:
505:
503:
497:
492:
491:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
465:
463:
456:
452:
451:
450:
449:
446:
442:
438:
434:
429:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
418:
413:
408:
400:
395:
390:
387:
382:
377:
369:
364:
359:
353:
350:
348:
342:
338:
334:
331:
328:
323:
319:
318:
317:
316:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
294:
293:
292:
291:
288:
285:
283:
277:
276:
271:
267:
266:
261:
257:
252:
246:
244:
237:
234:
233:
230:
226:
225:North America
218:
215:
208:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
613:
610:
591:
553:
525:
501:
474:
461:
427:
403:
398:
372:
367:
346:
299:
295:
281:
273:
263:
250:
242:
235:
211:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
75:Forefront.TV
67:Forefront.TV
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
596:K.e.coffman
160:free images
534:WP:TOOSOON
343:? Thanks.
320:Hi Delta,
254:Satisfies
619:talk page
406:Horrorist
375:Horrorist
37:talk page
621:or in a
556:Relisted
479:Delta13C
437:Delta13C
433:too soon
327:this one
304:Delta13C
214:Relisted
198:Delta13C
119:View log
39:or in a
566:King of
502:Lourdes
496:WEBCRIT
475:Variety
462:Lourdes
347:Lourdes
341:WEBCRIT
296:Comment
282:Lourdes
265:Variety
243:Lourdes
236:Comment
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
56:MBisanz
592:Delete
539:Jytdog
528:fails
526:delete
402:, the
371:, the
256:WP:GNG
138:Google
96:delete
50:delete
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
600:talk
543:talk
483:talk
441:talk
404:Mad
399:Zeke
373:Mad
368:Zeke
308:talk
270:this
268:and
260:this
251:Keep
202:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
322:GNG
272:in
262:in
188:TWL
117:– (
52:.
602:)
583:♠
545:)
485:)
443:)
435:.
396:.
365:.
310:)
204:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
598:(
580:♣
575:♦
570:♥
541:(
481:(
439:(
306:(
200:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.