Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Francesca Hogi - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

701:
least may have influenced the rankings. I haven't actually read the source despite knowing it exists, but it can probably be found without too much hassle and for the reason I explained, if the list is from either early this year or in 2012, the reason I explained means it could be unclear which page it would better suit, meaning it may not be as simple as you make it sound to just delete and put the information elsewhere. As for redirecting, you basically can't because she has a pretty even connection to both of her seasons. Like other delete claimers here, it seems as though you are looking at the box, but you are not actually looking inside the box, to put it into a context.--
720:. All of the properly cited and notable information already exists in the Redemption Island and Caramoan pages, and the information in the "Reception" section is either trivial, uncited or cited from a non-reputable source. Using Survivor Sucks as evidence for someone's reception is not valid, as there are supportive and non-supportive threads for nearly every player that has played Survivor. - 521:
professional lists of popular reality show personalities as well. She also has a distinction that hadn't been seen before in being voted out first TWICE. She is also the only early vote-off to be invited back for another season, although I can understand the claim in this current sentence to be seen as more trivia than a distinction.--
682:, she is not notable outside of Survivor and while she is notorious for being the first player eliminated on two different seasons, there is no information on her page right now that would not fit on the pages for both seasons. As other editors stated, her statistic is trivial and does not merit having her own page. - 700:
Where would you put for exmaple her ranking on the list of most popular African-American personalities? I'll admit I'm not sure when it was made but if it was done when there was even a chance of knowledge that she would be appearing on a later season (Caramoan), then that information at the very
520:
suggests this editor is quacking madly and whether or not they make a valid case, any sockpuppets they might be using should be blocked accordingly. Also, I don't think just anyone should have a page but she appeared on TWO television seasons and they were TWO years apart. She has appeared on
715:
The African-American reality stars list is not cited and, after a brief search as suggested by you, I can't find it. Also, the Dalton Ross quote ("Nobody has given you as much praise as we have.") is not in the cited article and, as discovered after another quick search, is only found on the
660:
Are you able to explain why it supposedly fails notability guidelines? It's all well and good to make a statement like that, but if you don't back it up with explaining why, your claim won't hold much water. Plus, Survivor stuff = full of stuff from a highly notable television
495:
provided is that the person was notable before he appeared on the show and he has other sources, but to write an article about someone because they came on the show more than once make it more of fancruft, in my opinion. The question is whether or not this person notable
960:: I am restoring the above two comments as they were posted before they were blocked and were blocked without warning or interaction to the users. I strongly suggest that anyone concerned with the legitamacy of these editors use the investigaions page. Thank you 259:
What difference does it makes if it was made a few days ago or a few years ago? Show me the policy where me must delete new articles just because they are new - oh wait, you can't. Also, some people didn't win Survivor, but are notable for other reasons such as
854:
I'll gladly take the opportunity to mention that we have another person here who claims that this should be 'delete' people, but again fails to give a reason as to WHY. Namely, why is it trivia? I wonder why they couldn't put that in their post?
348:
she appeared on a highly notable television show in 2011 and then again in a different season TWO YEARS later? Yeah, if this is 'one event', then the moon is made of cheese. Plus her first person voted out first twice on a reality show
796:, most Survivor candidates who have their own pages are noteworthy only because of their participation in the show. By being eliminated first in two seasons Francesca Hogi has made Survivor history, even if in a negative sense. - 734:
You might have a point, but then if this does get deleted, it would only be justice for the people desperate to see the page deleted to make sure to put the reliably sourced information in these articles. It is also no excuse for
486:
I think we need to AGF. I think the nominator is trying to point out the subject is only notable for Survivor. I seriously doubt that just because someone gets on a reality TV show they get their own article. The example of
176: 739:
to be under the microscope for similar reasons to Francesca Hogi because at least in his case, he is a United States Army veteran/former federal agent cited as having a book that is seperate from the show.--
59:. Poor discussion quality, including IPs edit-warring to close this discussion (!). I recommend relisting in a month or so in the hope of having a more focused discussion among experienced editors. 444:
You might like to read the arguments to avoid in deletion discussions page. Not only does your 'per nom' contribute nothing new to the table, but it's also been pretty established that this isn't
767:
Let's hope that the information is on those pages, otherwise justice isn't serve. I also didn't discuss Phillip Sheppard merely mentioned him in passing so please get your terminology in order.--
547:
A list of popular reality televsion contestants encompasses an entire genre of television personalities, not just personalities of the show. Interesting how you also have no response to the
471: 129: 643: 1063: 367: 512:
Question is, are you keeping to what is actually on the table, or are you just tring to cloud the discussion with nonsensical fluff instead of the actual discussion at hand?
407: 170: 1083: 387: 310:
Agreed as she is notworthy to the series as the furst contestant eliminated first twice, while Sandra Diaz-Twine also has a Knowledge (XXG) article for winning twice.
241:
only created a few days ago and hardly notable outside of the show. The only contestants that should get articles are the winners and this person lost early twice.
753:
There is no reliably sourced information that is not already in either of the two pages. Please leave discussion of Phillip Sheppard's RfD to that specific page. -
717: 716:
Knowledge (XXG) page in question and other pages that have been lifted directly from it. As per precedent with Russell Hantz, the page would be redirected to "
647: 136: 1017: 311: 569:
Yeah, but reading those articles all are notable for things outside the show. Getting voted out first twice is purely survivor trivia. –
981: 212: 946: 904: 961: 836: 102: 97: 17: 431: 106: 264:. Also, she lost FIRST twice and was the FIRST person to do so, a distinction not seen before. I don't believe she's as notable as 900: 89: 1044: 191: 23: 158: 1051: 573: 539: 504: 478: 1113: 47: 942: 860: 772: 744: 706: 666: 614: 560: 526: 461: 354: 273: 298: 152: 609:
No, it's reality television distinction. Name me one show in the entire genre where this has happened before.--
315: 1011: 985: 1048: 570: 536: 501: 475: 1095: 1075: 1054: 989: 977: 969: 928: 886: 864: 844: 832: 821: 805: 776: 762: 748: 729: 710: 691: 670: 651: 618: 576: 564: 542: 530: 507: 481: 465: 439: 435: 419: 399: 379: 358: 340: 319: 302: 277: 250: 233: 215: 148: 71: 965: 840: 1005: 453: 1109: 856: 768: 740: 702: 662: 610: 556: 522: 492: 457: 350: 336: 269: 43: 445: 328: 208: 736: 265: 198: 294: 896: 882: 184: 93: 1038: 814: 555:
and say that you weren't trying to patronize, but in case you were, it looks like it backfired.--
229: 1023: 1091: 1071: 758: 725: 687: 415: 395: 375: 246: 36:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1108:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
548: 517: 449: 42:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
332: 268:
but that's besides the point, the standard is Knowledge (XXG) policy, not other articles. --
164: 552: 513: 290: 801: 488: 261: 938: 924: 892: 878: 85: 77: 62: 331:. It's well-sourced, and while it may need a bit of cleanup, it's well worth keeping. 1034: 225: 1087: 1067: 754: 721: 683: 411: 391: 371: 242: 535:
Still what you're pointing out is all Survivor stuff, nothing outside the show. –
123: 224:
for now, it appears to be two events, since she is appearing on a second season.
797: 934: 920: 293:. Very well sourced. Noteworthy contestant towards the franchise. 1102:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
642:, fail notability guidelines and is full of survivor stuff. 24:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Francesca Hogi old vote
472:
Knowledge (XXG):Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
1030: 999: 119: 115: 111: 183: 197: 50:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1116:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1064:list of Television-related deletion discussions 452:suggests you are using multiple IP Adresses to 368:list of Television-related deletion discussions 718:List of Survivor (U.S. TV series) contestants 408:list of New York-related deletion discussions 8: 1082:Note: This debate has been included in the 1062:Note: This debate has been included in the 406:Note: This debate has been included in the 386:Note: This debate has been included in the 366:Note: This debate has been included in the 1084:list of People-related deletion discussions 388:list of People-related deletion discussions 1081: 1061: 813:, per everyone voted keep on the article. 405: 385: 365: 327:as this is very obviously not a case of 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 31: 644:2604:2D00:5:0:216:3EFF:FEF2:5BEC 216:16:28, 20 February 2013‎ (UTC) 1: 1096:20:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC) 1076:20:19, 26 February 2013 (UTC) 1055:04:05, 26 February 2013 (UTC) 990:23:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC) 970:20:00, 23 February 2013 (UTC) 929:21:05, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 887:20:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 865:19:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 845:19:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 822:12:50, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 806:10:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 777:02:10, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 763:02:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 749:02:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 730:01:56, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 711:01:18, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 692:01:05, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 671:00:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 652:00:10, 22 February 2013 (UTC) 619:19:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 577:19:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 565:19:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 543:19:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 531:19:38, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 508:19:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 482:20:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 466:18:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 440:18:33, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 420:13:15, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 400:13:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 380:13:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 359:07:12, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 341:03:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 320:02:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 303:02:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 278:19:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC) 251:22:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 234:20:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 72:20:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC) 1133: 551:part of my comment. I'll 1105:Please do not modify it. 39:Please do not modify it. 947:few or no other edits 905:few or no other edits 949:outside this topic. 907:outside this topic. 1029:on Sunday and was 470:Pointing to this: 55:The result was 1098: 1078: 980:comment added by 954: 953:blocked as a sock 950: 912: 911:blocked as a sock 908: 835:comment added by 422: 402: 382: 70: 22:(Redirected from 1124: 1107: 1028: 1027: 1008: 992: 952: 932: 910: 890: 857:DrumstickJuggler 847: 819: 769:DrumstickJuggler 741:DrumstickJuggler 737:Phillip Sheppard 703:DrumstickJuggler 663:DrumstickJuggler 611:DrumstickJuggler 557:DrumstickJuggler 523:DrumstickJuggler 493:DrumstickJuggler 458:DrumstickJuggler 351:DrumstickJuggler 270:DrumstickJuggler 266:Phillip Sheppard 202: 201: 187: 139: 127: 109: 69: 67: 60: 41: 27: 1132: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1114:deletion review 1103: 1047:) yesterday. – 1009: 1004: 1003: 998:: This AFD was 975: 830: 815: 489:Jonathan Penner 295:MouthlessBobcat 262:Jonathan Penner 207:Clasic case of 144: 135: 100: 84: 81: 63: 61: 48:deletion review 37: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1130: 1128: 1119: 1118: 1099: 1079: 1058: 1057: 1006:174.236.68.111 993: 972: 955: 913: 877:per Katinin. 870: 869: 868: 867: 849: 848: 829:pure trivia. 824: 808: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 695: 694: 676: 675: 674: 673: 655: 654: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 484: 424: 423: 403: 383: 362: 361: 343: 322: 312:205.209.83.211 305: 289:. Falls under 283: 282: 281: 280: 254: 253: 236: 213:96.224.44.119 205: 204: 141: 86:Francesca Hogi 80: 78:Francesca Hogi 75: 53: 52: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1129: 1117: 1115: 1111: 1106: 1100: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1080: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1053: 1050: 1046: 1043: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1007: 1001: 997: 994: 991: 987: 983: 982:96.242.38.111 979: 973: 971: 967: 963: 959: 956: 948: 944: 940: 936: 931: 930: 926: 922: 918: 914: 906: 902: 898: 894: 889: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 871: 866: 862: 858: 853: 852: 851: 850: 846: 842: 838: 834: 828: 825: 823: 820: 818: 817:ApprenticeFan 812: 809: 807: 803: 799: 795: 792: 791: 778: 774: 770: 766: 765: 764: 760: 756: 752: 751: 750: 746: 742: 738: 733: 732: 731: 727: 723: 719: 714: 713: 712: 708: 704: 699: 698: 697: 696: 693: 689: 685: 681: 678: 677: 672: 668: 664: 659: 658: 657: 656: 653: 649: 645: 641: 638: 637: 620: 616: 612: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 578: 575: 572: 568: 567: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 545: 544: 541: 538: 534: 533: 532: 528: 524: 519: 515: 511: 510: 509: 506: 503: 499: 494: 490: 485: 483: 480: 477: 473: 469: 468: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 442: 441: 437: 433: 429: 426: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 404: 401: 397: 393: 389: 384: 381: 377: 373: 369: 364: 363: 360: 356: 352: 347: 344: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 323: 321: 317: 313: 309: 306: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 285: 284: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 258: 257: 256: 255: 252: 248: 244: 240: 237: 235: 231: 227: 223: 220: 219: 218: 217: 214: 210: 200: 196: 193: 190: 186: 182: 178: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 150: 147: 146:Find sources: 142: 138: 134: 131: 125: 121: 117: 113: 108: 104: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 82: 79: 76: 74: 73: 68: 66: 58: 51: 49: 45: 40: 34: 33: 25: 19: 1104: 1101: 1049:BuickCentury 1041: 1020: 1014: 995: 976:— Preceding 962:174.226.4.31 957: 919:per above. 916: 915: 874: 873: 837:69.174.58.36 831:— Preceding 826: 816: 810: 793: 679: 639: 571:BuickCentury 537:BuickCentury 502:BuickCentury 500:Survivor. – 497: 476:BuickCentury 454:WP:VOTESTACK 427: 349:distinction. 345: 324: 307: 286: 238: 221: 206: 194: 188: 180: 173: 167: 161: 155: 145: 132: 64: 57:no consensus 56: 54: 38: 35: 945:) has made 903:) has made 811:Strong keep 448:. Thirdly, 446:WP:ONEEVENT 432:24.46.86.58 333:Mr. Gerbear 329:WP:ONEEVENT 209:WP:ONEEVENT 171:free images 65:Sandstein 1110:talk page 1088:• Gene93k 1068:• Gene93k 1033:again by 893:Sporty213 879:Sporty213 412:• Gene93k 392:• Gene93k 372:• Gene93k 44:talk page 1112:or in a 1045:contribs 1035:Frietjes 1031:reopened 1018:contribs 978:unsigned 943:contribs 901:contribs 833:unsigned 430:per nom 226:Frietjes 130:View log 46:or in a 958:Comment 855:Hmmm.-- 755:Katanin 722:Katanin 684:Katanin 661:show.-- 549:WP:DUCK 518:WP:DUCK 516:or not 498:outside 450:WP:DUCK 243:Vao Tv1 177:WP refs 165:scholar 103:protect 98:history 1052:Driver 1000:closed 974:keep 917:Delete 875:Delete 827:delete 680:Delete 640:Delete 574:Driver 553:WP:AGF 540:Driver 514:WP:AGF 505:Driver 479:Driver 428:Delete 291:WP:BIO 239:Delete 149:Google 107:delete 1024:WHOIS 798:AK456 491:that 192:JSTOR 153:books 124:views 116:watch 112:links 16:< 1092:talk 1072:talk 1039:talk 1012:talk 996:Note 986:talk 966:talk 939:talk 935:Foac 925:talk 921:Foac 897:talk 883:talk 861:talk 841:talk 802:talk 794:Keep 773:talk 759:talk 745:talk 726:talk 707:talk 688:talk 667:talk 648:talk 615:talk 561:talk 527:talk 474:. – 462:talk 436:talk 416:talk 396:talk 376:talk 355:talk 346:Keep 337:talk 325:Keep 316:talk 308:Keep 299:talk 287:keep 274:talk 247:talk 230:talk 222:keep 185:FENS 159:news 137:Hogi 120:logs 94:talk 90:edit 1002:by 199:TWL 128:– ( 1094:) 1086:. 1074:) 1066:. 988:) 968:) 951:, 941:• 933:— 927:) 909:, 899:• 891:— 885:) 863:) 843:) 804:) 775:) 761:) 747:) 728:) 709:) 690:) 669:) 650:) 617:) 563:) 529:) 464:) 456:-- 438:) 418:) 410:. 398:) 390:. 378:) 370:. 357:) 339:) 318:) 301:) 276:) 249:) 232:) 211:, 179:) 122:| 118:| 114:| 110:| 105:| 101:| 96:| 92:| 1090:( 1070:( 1042:· 1037:( 1026:) 1021:· 1015:· 1010:( 984:( 964:( 937:( 923:( 895:( 881:( 859:( 839:( 800:( 771:( 757:( 743:( 724:( 705:( 686:( 665:( 646:( 613:( 559:( 525:( 460:( 434:( 414:( 394:( 374:( 353:( 335:( 314:( 297:( 272:( 245:( 228:( 203:) 195:· 189:· 181:· 174:· 168:· 162:· 156:· 151:( 143:( 140:) 133:· 126:) 88:( 26:)

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Francesca Hogi old vote
talk page
deletion review
 Sandstein 
20:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Francesca Hogi
Francesca Hogi
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Hogi
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:ONEEVENT
96.224.44.119

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.