401:
of note: no law review, no moot court leadership, no major appellate wins, no clerkship, no published or edited articles, no academic service, not yet Q.C., no partnership nor ownership stake in a law firm, no public service, no political campaign of his own. Quite bluntly, this person appears to be
354:
leave open the possibility of exceptions or points that might not have been previously considered. That's why they're called guidelines and not decrees. But that has no bearing on the matter at hand, which is that
163:
286:
at all. The most substantive notability claim he's got here is "provided legal commentary to the media on a couple of news stories" — but that does not bestow notability on a lawyer, because he's not the
350:
of
Knowledge's subject-specific notability guidelines is a perfectly "exhaustive listing of every factor that might make a practitioner of that field of endeavour notable" — they
219:
116:
157:
267:
Looks like a publicity piece to me. He is a lawyer who occasionally puts out a podcast and serves on the boards of a few orgs, No indication that he is notable. –
199:
249:
234:
123:
89:
84:
93:
76:
17:
178:
145:
434:
40:
139:
279:
329:
was not intended by its author to be a exhaustive listing of every factor that might make a lawyer notable.
415:
379:
338:
316:
273:
256:
241:
226:
211:
135:
58:
394:
80:
430:
253:
238:
223:
36:
326:
283:
185:
56:
72:
64:
171:
334:
411:
375:
312:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
429:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
269:
151:
207:
195:
53:
403:
330:
300:
407:
371:
360:
308:
110:
282:, for a lawyer who doesn't really show even the slightest evidence of passing
203:
299:
who doesn't know the subject personally — so there's almost certainly a
423:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
295:
too casual, both in dress and in setting, to have been taken by
366:
claim that would pass even the most liberal interpretation of
404:
as run of the mill as your average junior associate could be
278:
This is a prosified résumé, relying almost entirely on
106:
102:
98:
170:
220:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
437:). No further edits should be made to this page.
184:
8:
248:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:Note: This debate has been included in the
218:Note: This debate has been included in the
250:list of Canada-related deletion discussions
247:
232:
217:
235:list of Law-related deletion discussions
200:WP:Articles for deletion/Edward H. Royle
7:
325:As I have already mentioned before,
291:of that coverage. And the photo is
24:
370:of Knowledge's inclusion tests.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
416:22:14, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
380:21:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
339:12:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
317:08:56, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
274:20:01, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
257:06:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
242:06:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
227:06:43, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
212:06:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
59:02:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
202:, created by the same user.
194:Non-notable attorney, fails
454:
426:Please do not modify it.
395:my standards for lawyers
359:article isn't making or
32:Please do not modify it.
397:. He's literally done
48:The result was
393:- he badly fails
361:reliably sourcing
303:issue here, too.
259:
244:
229:
445:
428:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
34:
453:
452:
448:
447:
446:
444:
443:
442:
441:
435:deletion review
424:
280:primary sources
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
451:
449:
440:
439:
419:
418:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
342:
341:
320:
319:
276:
261:
260:
245:
230:
192:
191:
128:
73:Franklin Lyons
67:
65:Franklin Lyons
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
450:
438:
436:
432:
427:
421:
420:
417:
413:
409:
405:
400:
396:
392:
389:
388:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
358:
353:
349:
346:
345:
344:
343:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
323:
322:
321:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
285:
281:
277:
275:
272:
271:
266:
263:
262:
258:
255:
251:
246:
243:
240:
236:
231:
228:
225:
221:
216:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
201:
198:. Similar to
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
425:
422:
398:
390:
367:
363:
356:
351:
347:
304:
296:
292:
288:
268:
264:
254:NorthAmerica
239:NorthAmerica
224:NorthAmerica
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
270:Philosopher
158:free images
327:WP:LAWYERS
284:WP:LAWYERS
54:j⚛e decker
431:talk page
37:talk page
433:or in a
331:James500
196:WP:BASIC
117:View log
39:or in a
408:Bearian
399:nothing
372:Bearcat
309:Bearcat
297:anybody
289:subject
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
391:Delete
305:Delete
301:WP:COI
265:Delete
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
204:Zanhe
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
412:talk
376:talk
357:this
348:None
335:talk
313:talk
208:talk
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
368:any
364:any
352:all
293:far
186:TWL
115:– (
414:)
406:.
378:)
337:)
315:)
307:.
252:.
237:.
222:.
210:)
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
410:(
374:(
333:(
311:(
206:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.