490:
until the WB going cable made launching an OTA WB affiliate on a small translator which only gets 10% of the market silly. A clear case of a station treated as a hobby by its owner, and never a serious effort to do much more than that, which KUCO jumped on and got the translator for a pittance. Might
478:
launched), and since it didn't keep the affiliation, ripe with technical errors, low ratings, zero cable reception, and terrible surrounding programming which made a cable channel launch almost compulsory in
Redding to get any kind of audience. Generally, being associated with Network One also shamed
282:
no one seems to have made any effort yet to find sources, but a merge to
Redding, California may be in order. I am of the opinion that radio and TV stations that actually transmitted should be entitled to an article. But that is a bit outside the scope of this.
400:
for broadcast stations works just fine for larger stations, it may not hold much weight for a low-power station with few references that aren't from the FCC. That only indicates paper existence… but the lone reference on the entire page is
479:
your station to no cable reception and only curiousity-seeking ratings, and likely K46DQ, if it programmed any local shows, did only paid time stuff. A second source from the same source cited for WB affiliation above said
167:
429:
repeater that has nothing to do with "KDQT"/K46DQ? (And I too generally prefer to have articles on actually-extant stations than not, but the sources have to be there first…) --
236:
214:
462:
I cannot seem to trace any history of this station at all with my
Highbeam account either under KDQT or K46DQ, and going by the history of the replacement WB affiliate
122:
161:
425:
stage…) How many people even care that channel 46 in
Redding, California was anything other than the current facility on the channel, a
483:. So we have likely a five year station which never got off the ground outside of automated programming from Network One and was under
127:
448:
487:
379:
FCC call letters from defunct stations can be reassigned. In the future, this call could be assigned to a TV or radio station.
361:
17:
524:
418:
410:
305:
484:
475:
182:
470:
as subchannel 12.2, even if this station was a WB affiliate it was a short period of time, only as much as a year
561:
288:
149:
40:
536:
95:
90:
99:
557:
527:. Redirect can always be changed if the callsign is reassigned, but not redirecting because it might is
443:
82:
36:
143:
284:
532:
506:
422:
356:
175:
463:
414:
402:
384:
313:
270:
139:
86:
542:
528:
515:
454:
388:
367:
329:
317:
292:
274:
250:
246:
228:
224:
206:
64:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
556:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
431:
406:
339:
189:
397:
326:
203:
78:
70:
494:
351:
55:
380:
309:
266:
199:
396:; this seems to be one of those obscure stations that nobody watched, and while the
242:
220:
491:
be worth a short sentence in that article with these sources, but not a redirect.
155:
116:
480:
471:
301:
262:
342:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
467:
426:
550:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
405:
that states right at the bottom, in the fine print, that
112:
108:
104:
174:
415:
we shouldn't use our mirrors and forks as references
349:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
564:). No further edits should be made to this page.
52:. Whether to redirect is an editorial decision.
237:list of Television-related deletion discussions
215:list of California-related deletion discussions
188:
8:
235:Note: This debate has been included in the
213:Note: This debate has been included in the
466:before it's redirection in October 2007 to
308:(where this station is already listed). --
234:
212:
325:- I think redirect is the way to go. --
421:and officially it never made it past
419:its call letters were actually K46DQ…
7:
472:going by this source (PDF, pg. 14)
24:
417:. (Oh, and according to the FCC,
198:Doesn't establish notability per
481:it was gone by May 1999 (pg. 12)
474:(up to September 1998 when the
202:, should be merged or deleted.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
525:List of Network One affiliates
413:. It goes without saying that
411:List of Network One affiliates
306:List of Network One affiliates
1:
265:Relatively minor station. --
581:
543:05:42, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
398:presumption of notability
251:19:44, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
229:19:44, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
207:17:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
65:07:28, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
553:Please do not modify it.
516:05:33, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
455:03:00, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
389:19:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
368:02:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
330:16:01, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
318:22:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
293:21:53, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
275:03:25, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
377:Delete, do not redirect
476:WB 100+ cable channels
407:it is merely a version
261:Doesn't seem to pass
488:construction permits
460:Delete, no redirect
423:construction permit
464:KIWB (The CW Plus)
48:The result was
513:
403:a search.com page
370:
253:
240:
231:
218:
63:
572:
555:
539:
514:
509:
503:
502:
497:
451:
446:
438:
434:
366:
364:
359:
354:
348:
344:
241:
219:
193:
192:
178:
130:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
580:
579:
575:
574:
573:
571:
570:
569:
568:
562:deletion review
551:
541:
537:
507:
500:
495:
492:
453:
449:
444:
436:
432:
362:
357:
352:
350:
337:
285:Graeme Bartlett
135:
126:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
578:
576:
567:
566:
546:
545:
535:
533:The Bushranger
518:
457:
442:
391:
373:
372:
371:
346:
345:
334:
333:
332:
320:
295:
277:
255:
254:
232:
196:
195:
132:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
577:
565:
563:
559:
554:
548:
547:
544:
540:
538:One ping only
534:
530:
526:
522:
519:
517:
512:
510:
499:
498:
489:
486:
482:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
458:
456:
452:
447:
441:
440:
439:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
399:
395:
392:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
374:
369:
365:
360:
355:
347:
343:
341:
336:
335:
331:
328:
324:
321:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
296:
294:
290:
286:
281:
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
238:
233:
230:
226:
222:
216:
211:
210:
209:
208:
205:
201:
191:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:Find sources:
133:
129:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
552:
549:
520:
504:
493:
459:
435:
430:
393:
376:
338:
322:
297:
279:
258:
197:
185:
179:
171:
164:
158:
152:
146:
136:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
409:of our own
302:Network One
259:Weak delete
162:free images
529:WP:CRYSTAL
327:Nathan2055
204:Nathan2055
58:Sandstein
558:talk page
485:perpetual
437:Quidditch
280:weak keep
243:• Gene93k
221:• Gene93k
37:talk page
560:or in a
521:Redirect
381:Roodog2k
340:Relisted
310:MelanieN
298:Redirect
267:Artene50
123:View log
39:or in a
508:chatter
468:KHSL-TV
427:KUCO-LP
323:Comment
168:WP refs
156:scholar
96:protect
91:history
394:Delete
304:or to
200:WP:GNG
140:Google
100:delete
50:delete
358:music
183:JSTOR
144:books
128:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
531:. -
496:Nate
385:talk
314:talk
289:talk
271:talk
263:WP:N
247:talk
225:talk
176:FENS
150:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
79:KDQT
71:KDQT
523:to
363:ian
300:to
190:TWL
125:•
121:– (
433:WC
387:)
316:)
291:)
273:)
249:)
239:.
227:)
217:.
170:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
511:)
505:(
501:•
450:✎
445:☎
383:(
353:B
312:(
287:(
269:(
245:(
223:(
194:)
186:·
180:·
172:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
142:(
134:(
131:)
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.