319:. The nominator is making it increasingly difficult to assume good faith. This is looking more and more like harassment of the article creator, particularly with the repeated and tendentious characterization of a deadlink as a "bogus source", and the repeated insinuation that somebody winning an award for promoting enterprise should be treated as a "contentious claim" per WP:BLP. --
260:
inserted. In fact the link does not even feature the person in questions name. Isn't inserting bogus sources an abuse of the system? As for WP:ANYBIO, until it can be proven that this person won an award which confers notabity, this assertion is pie in the sky. Advice - the article creator needs to back up claims with reliable sources, as per GNG and WP:BLP.
341:, and that it once provided a link to a pdf listing previous Queen's Award for Enterprise Promotion winners. Whoever it was that called this link "bogus" owes somebody an apology. While it is regrettable that the list of winners is not archived, there is an alternative source for the 2005–2010 recipients here:
430:
The link was added in 2010, when it looked very different; you are removing it with edit summaries that unreasonably assume bad faith. You are removing the information sourced to the link as though it were controversial information (which it isn't). You could very easily leave the information and add
391:
It contains the words "Download a list of the 2011 and previous recipients of The QAEP (PDF, 198K) - Opens in a new window." That list has not been archived, but assuming good faith means not accusing other editors of adding "bogus" or "false" links, when the link they provided in 2010 still, in
259:
That's not how it works and the 'ego' and 'condescending attitude' isn't appeciated or appropriate. The onus is on the article creator to provide sources to back up claims. There are no sources to suggest this person won an award, and the link did not suggest anything of the sort when it was
566:
as I see how this would be keepable but I'm simply not seeing much convincingly better aside from some usual news mentions from my searches. If better is made, I would be willing to go weak keep but I'm not entirely convinced at this time. Feel free to draft and userfy until better is made,
367:
338:
163:
431:
new sources for it, but instead you are removing it under false pretences (that the source was fraudulent; that the information is controversial). That's why I reverted you the first time I saw you doing it.
416:. If you have good citation, by all means add it, but please don't add a link which isn't relevant to the article, and according to all available evidence, never was relevant to the article.
229:. It is now a dead link. If you choose to replace it with a better link, that is fine. Until then removing the dead link, then prodding the article under BLP is an abuse of the system.
533:
502:
116:
433:
Now you're either trolling, or you've got so caught up in your zeal for deleting these articles that you can't tell how troll-like your behaviour is becoming. Either way,
157:
619:
225:
GNG does not require that there are sources in the article that back up GNG claims. Having said that, when I inserted the source it did back up both GNG and
392:
2011, led to a downloadable pdf list of recipients. You can *very* easily confirm the information from other sources (such as the one I gave you, but the
123:
89:
84:
93:
17:
178:
76:
145:
461:
453:
403:
350:
324:
232:
It would be useful if you could share the sources you found for Karen Arnold while you were making this nomination.
703:
635:
283:
240:
40:
573:
139:
457:
436:
399:
346:
320:
435:
I will not be drawn into an edit war on it, and I will not communicate with you further on this matter. --
135:
699:
684:
668:
615:
595:
578:
555:
524:
487:
465:
425:
407:
379:
354:
328:
311:
289:
269:
246:
203:
58:
54:
36:
398:
might also be an option) rather than remove the information while adding denigratory edit summaries. --
666:
651:
632:
606:. can't see enough news mentions or refs which would lead reasonable person to think she is notable.
280:
237:
194:
Doesn't meet GNG. Article creator has a history of inserting sources which don't back up GNG claims.
185:
682:
611:
568:
547:
516:
483:
421:
375:
265:
199:
171:
80:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
698:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
655:
586:. There are a few refs in the article but they have no depth, indicating she isn't notable.
307:
275:
226:
213:
663:
659:
591:
151:
370:
does not feature any mention of Karen Arnold, in the past or present. How is it relevant?
677:
627:
623:
607:
537:
506:
479:
417:
394:
371:
261:
195:
342:
413:
217:
72:
64:
110:
303:
412:"That list has not been archived". Precisely why it should be challenged under
587:
345:. Whoever removed the previous link might like to replace it with this one. --
676:
Adequate coverage by enough sources to establish notability per WP:GNG.
658:
and through sufficient coverage in independent, reliable sources
692:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
106:
102:
98:
170:
478:
link removal was correct for reasons already given.
534:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
503:
343:
http://www.enterprisepromotion.org/queensawards.htm
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
706:). No further edits should be made to this page.
184:
8:
532:Note: This debate has been included in the
501:Note: This debate has been included in the
456:) 21:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC) (redacted --
531:
500:
216:. Also has coverage sufficient to meet
302:- Appears to satisfy the guidelines.--
7:
368:what the dead link used to look like
339:what the dead link used to look like
212:Subject won a major award, meeting
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
337:It is in fact possible to see
1:
685:07:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
669:00:56, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
616:20:53, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
596:16:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
579:06:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
556:20:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
525:20:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
488:16:53, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
466:11:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
426:16:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
408:22:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
380:20:13, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
355:19:14, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
329:18:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
312:15:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
290:01:57, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
270:00:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
247:00:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
204:00:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
59:01:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
723:
654:points out she meets both
235:Thank you. All the best:
695:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
620:Sockpuppet account
458:Andreas Philopater
437:Andreas Philopater
400:Andreas Philopater
347:Andreas Philopater
321:Andreas Philopater
641:
558:
551:
527:
520:
293:
278:. All the best:
250:
714:
697:
680:
640:2015-11-30Z01:18
639:
576:
571:
553:
550:
544:
541:
522:
519:
513:
510:
288:
245:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
57:
34:
722:
721:
717:
716:
715:
713:
712:
711:
710:
704:deletion review
693:
678:
652:Rich Farmbrough
574:
569:
548:
542:
539:
528:
517:
511:
508:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
720:
718:
709:
708:
688:
687:
671:
644:
643:
642:
624:User:Tonyinman
599:
598:
581:
570:SwisterTwister
564:Delete for now
560:
559:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
395:London Gazette
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
332:
331:
314:
297:
296:
295:
294:
253:
252:
251:
233:
230:
222:
221:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
719:
707:
705:
701:
696:
690:
689:
686:
683:
681:
675:
672:
670:
667:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
646:
645:
638:
637:
634:
629:
625:
621:
618:
617:
613:
609:
605:
601:
600:
597:
593:
589:
585:
582:
580:
577:
572:
565:
562:
561:
557:
554:
552:
546:
545:
535:
530:
529:
526:
523:
521:
515:
514:
504:
489:
485:
481:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
467:
463:
459:
455:
438:
434:
429:
428:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
397:
396:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
358:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
334:
333:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
291:
286:
285:
282:
277:
273:
272:
271:
267:
263:
258:
255:
254:
248:
243:
242:
239:
234:
231:
228:
224:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
56:
55:North America
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
694:
691:
673:
647:
631:
603:
602:
583:
563:
549:
538:
518:
507:
451:
432:
393:
366:
316:
299:
279:
274:Please read
256:
236:
209:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
73:Karen Arnold
65:Karen Arnold
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
626:, known as
158:free images
664:Sam Sailor
480:isfutile:P
418:isfutile:P
372:isfutile:P
359:Your link:
284:Farmbrough
262:isfutile:P
241:Farmbrough
196:isfutile:P
700:talk page
679:Montanabw
656:WP:ANYBIO
608:Totolatin
276:WP:BEFORE
227:WP:ANYBIO
214:WP:ANYBIO
37:talk page
702:or in a
660:WP:BASIC
117:View log
39:or in a
257:Comment
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
628:futile
604:Delete
584:Delete
414:WP:BLP
304:Ykraps
218:WP:GNG
136:Google
94:delete
650:- As
588:Szzuk
540:Human
509:Human
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
674:Keep
648:Keep
612:talk
592:talk
575:talk
543:3015
512:3015
484:talk
462:talk
454:talk
422:talk
404:talk
376:talk
351:talk
325:talk
317:Keep
308:talk
300:Keep
281:Rich
266:talk
238:Rich
210:Keep
200:talk
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
662:.
622:of
186:TWL
115:– (
52:.
636:F.
633:R.
630:.
614:)
594:)
536:.
505:.
486:)
468:)
464:)
424:)
406:)
378:)
353:)
327:)
310:)
268:)
202:)
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
610:(
590:(
499::
482:(
460:(
452:(
420:(
402:(
374:(
349:(
323:(
306:(
292:.
287:,
264:(
249:.
244:,
220:.
198:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.