Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/KarloCompare - Knowledge

Source 📝

432:. When I said my vote stands, my reasoning stands as well and not the vote itself. Second. I don't mind if the weight of my reason to keep or delete a certain article is not as heavy or light than the others. All that matters is that I've said my viewpoints. If other people vote to delete it for a reason, then be it. If they voted to keep it for a reason, then be it. I respect their viewpoints. And mine should be respected as well. Third. Anyone has the option to respond or not. If he chooses to respond, then fine. But, if he chooses not to respond, then be it. But whether I respond or not, my viewpoints will stand. Therefore, no matter how many times you argue with me, I 414:- first, it isn't a vote count and second, if you decide not to respond to editors pointing out why your reasoning is flawed and you don't respond, a closing admin will generally reach an understanding that you concede the points raised and discount your !vote. 593:
is an article on "What entrepreneurs should do to get their startups financed" and contains a long interview with executives from "TLP e-Ventures" who invested in the company. The topic company is very briefly mentioned, fails
502:
The sources provided above are laughably bad, mostly unreliable and even so, they are barely even a passing mention. The current article is straight up spam and I can find nothing to indicate that this is actually notable.
206: 541:
on what is required which can be summarized as follows. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of
254: 200: 159: 334: 314: 294: 274: 581:
is a recap of investments in companies in Pakistan and contains a paragraph on the company. The paragraph is a standard company description used in PR. Fails
237:
Seems to be a run of the mill company that does not satisfy NCORP. Coverage is limited to routine funding announcements, brief mentions and press releases.
106: 91: 555:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
590: 367: 166: 537:
First off, the criteria for references to establish notability is not just whether the publications is a "reliable source". There are
570: 454: 391: 361: 132: 127: 136: 86: 79: 17: 578: 364: 562: 358: 221: 119: 188: 100: 96: 474: 602:. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG/NCORP. 370: 625: 40: 182: 565:
is based on an announcement from a venture capital fund that they'd invested in the company, therefore fails
410:, it has been mentioned once before that I know of. You have a mistaken idea of the AfD Process. You say 178: 621: 608: 529: 512: 492: 461: 420: 398: 346: 326: 306: 286: 266: 246: 61: 36: 123: 508: 450: 387: 57: 228: 595: 586: 574: 546: 520:
The sources found by Superastig don’t look like in-depth coverage in reliable independent sources.
488: 214: 115: 67: 525: 75: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
620:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
599: 582: 566: 550: 542: 558: 538: 504: 442: 407: 379: 374: 342: 322: 302: 282: 262: 242: 194: 53: 553:. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include 484: 603: 425: 415: 521: 153: 338: 318: 298: 278: 258: 238: 440:
I really do. And I won't reply from hereon as this is not worth arguing.
428:, First. I've been participating in AfDs before and, for Christ's sake, 616:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
477:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
149: 145: 141: 213: 357:: I found a few reliable sources about the company: 483:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 373:. With these, the article is good enough to pass 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 628:). No further edits should be made to this page. 333:Note: This discussion has been included in the 313:Note: This discussion has been included in the 293:Note: This discussion has been included in the 273:Note: This discussion has been included in the 253:Note: This discussion has been included in the 255:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 377:. My vote stands. I won't reply any further. 335:list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions 315:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 295:list of Internet-related deletion discussions 227: 8: 275:list of Finance-related deletion discussions 107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 557:. None of the reference meet the criteria. 436:misunderstood the idea of any AfD Process. 430:I really know that this is not a vote count 332: 312: 292: 272: 252: 412:My vote stands. I won't reply any further 549:and (this bit is important!) containing 411: 547:in-depth information *on the company* 7: 24: 92:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 561:above mentions 4 references. 82:(AfD)? Read these primers! 645: 579:This second from TechJuice 573:is a brief mention, fails 530:16:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC) 513:15:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC) 493:15:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC) 399:08:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC) 347:09:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 327:09:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 307:09:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 287:09:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 267:09:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 247:09:13, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 618:Please do not modify it. 609:12:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 591:this from Pakistan Today 462:13:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 421:12:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC) 62:16:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 369:. It's also mentioned 571:This from Daily Times 551:"Independent Content" 80:Articles for deletion 543:significant coverage 563:This from TechJuice 539:strict guidelines 495: 349: 329: 309: 289: 269: 97:Guide to deletion 87:How to contribute 636: 482: 480: 478: 460: 458: 445: 397: 395: 382: 232: 231: 217: 169: 157: 139: 77: 34: 644: 643: 639: 638: 637: 635: 634: 633: 632: 626:deletion review 496: 473: 471: 459: 448: 443: 441: 438:I rest my case. 396: 385: 380: 378: 174: 165: 130: 114: 111: 74: 71: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 642: 640: 631: 630: 612: 611: 532: 515: 481: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 447: 384: 351: 350: 330: 310: 290: 270: 235: 234: 171: 110: 109: 104: 94: 89: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 641: 629: 627: 623: 619: 614: 613: 610: 607: 606: 601: 597: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 533: 531: 527: 523: 519: 516: 514: 510: 506: 501: 498: 497: 494: 490: 486: 479: 476: 463: 456: 452: 446: 439: 435: 431: 427: 424: 423: 422: 419: 418: 413: 409: 405: 402: 401: 400: 393: 389: 383: 376: 372: 368: 365: 362: 359: 356: 353: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 331: 328: 324: 320: 316: 311: 308: 304: 300: 296: 291: 288: 284: 280: 276: 271: 268: 264: 260: 256: 251: 250: 249: 248: 244: 240: 230: 226: 223: 220: 216: 212: 208: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 180: 177: 176:Find sources: 172: 168: 164: 161: 155: 151: 147: 143: 138: 134: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 108: 105: 102: 98: 95: 93: 90: 88: 85: 84: 83: 81: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 617: 615: 604: 596:WP:CORPDEPTH 587:WP:CORPDEPTH 575:WP:CORPDEPTH 554: 534: 517: 499: 472: 437: 433: 429: 416: 403: 354: 236: 224: 218: 210: 203: 197: 191: 185: 175: 162: 116:KarloCompare 73: 68:KarloCompare 49: 47: 31: 28: 589:. Finally, 201:free images 559:Superastig 505:Praxidicae 408:Superastig 54:Malcolmxl5 622:talk page 600:WP:ORGIND 583:WP:ORGIND 567:WP:ORGIND 485:TheImaCow 37:talk page 624:or in a 605:HighKing 475:Relisted 455:ICE CUBE 426:HighKing 417:HighKing 392:ICE CUBE 375:WP:NCORP 160:View log 101:glossary 39:or in a 522:Mccapra 444:ASTIG😎 404:Comment 381:ASTIG😎 207:WP refs 195:scholar 133:protect 128:history 78:New to 535:Delete 518:Delete 500:delete 179:Google 137:delete 50:delete 545:with 451:ICE T 434:never 388:ICE T 339:M4DU7 319:M4DU7 299:M4DU7 279:M4DU7 259:M4DU7 239:M4DU7 222:JSTOR 183:books 167:Stats 154:views 146:watch 142:links 16:< 598:and 585:and 526:talk 509:talk 489:talk 406:Hey 371:here 366:and 355:Keep 343:talk 323:talk 303:talk 283:talk 263:talk 243:talk 215:FENS 189:news 150:logs 124:talk 120:edit 58:talk 229:TWL 158:– ( 577:. 569:. 528:) 511:) 491:) 453:• 390:• 363:, 360:, 345:) 337:. 325:) 317:. 305:) 297:. 285:) 277:. 265:) 257:. 245:) 209:) 152:| 148:| 144:| 140:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 60:) 52:. 524:( 507:( 487:( 457:) 449:( 394:) 386:( 341:( 321:( 301:( 281:( 261:( 241:( 233:) 225:· 219:· 211:· 204:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 181:( 173:( 170:) 163:· 156:) 118:( 103:) 99:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Malcolmxl5
talk
16:47, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
KarloCompare

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
KarloCompare
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.