415:
sourced by a primary, but no required secondary to verify the interpretation of the wiki-contributors. Lacking those secondary sources we have zero verifiability, so this article as of this timestamp is by definition original research, no matter how accurate or even notable. So delete then userfy is the best course of action, unless someone adds secondaries before the close. Mere editing can't fix this. This threshold demands sources, or at least the presumption of.
235:, but the present article is not at all about a person. That said, I vote to delete as the article does not have any kind of references nor any reliable sources found from searching the web. I don't think any real research has gone into the history of the caste. IMHO people in India tend to brawl about their caste a lot (they even keep it in their names) - so a lot of material in the article might be NPOV and OR. —
414:
seems to indicate we're dealing with a community of almost 3000 identified members. Have no problem userfying to a sandboxspace so it can be improved enough to justify later inclusion. Knowledge policy cautions against use of primary sources without proper care. There are lots of assertions arguably
386:
Of course religious texts are RSs for their contents, just as any other primary source. Even if one considers them just as fiction, they're still the preferred source for what they say. What they cannot be used for is proof of the actual historicity of what they say, unless there is additional
290:
I am trying create an article on "Kulshreshtha
Community of India. I believe you have objections over the source of the information. The source is quoted in most cases. Example, Rig Veda, Garuda Purana whoch are all old Indian religious and spiritual texts. These texts also help in tracing the
294:
Kayasthas are the 2nd largest community in India. I believe information on prominent
Kayastha communities like Kulshreshthas deserves a place on prominent databases. However, you are free to delete it or ask me further question if you donot find it suitable to be posted on Knowledge.
157:
331:"Kayasthas are the 2nd largest community in India". I really doubt that's even true. And if Kulshreshtha is related to Kayastha, why not merge the Kulshretha article along with the Kayastha article? —
118:
151:
205:
387:
evidence. If this caste is referred to significantly in these scriptures, it's notable ; what is needed is sources for the present day significance.
370:
264:
91:
86:
311:
95:
17:
172:
78:
139:
366:
260:
48:. Consensus is that this sort of topic needs reliable secondary sources, not just religious texts as primary sources.
439:
36:
438:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
133:
291:
history of our culture. Other facts are based on real life findings about this community through research.
129:
424:
398:
374:
347:
315:
285:
268:
251:
220:
197:
60:
299:
281:
216:
193:
303:
179:
307:
165:
343:
247:
420:
407:
82:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
277:
212:
189:
145:
51:
394:
334:
238:
416:
360:
232:
74:
66:
112:
188:
No assertion of importance or notability, unsourced. Has been previously CSDed. —
359:
is blissfully ignorant of the fact that religious scriptures are not considered
389:
259:
Unsourced and badly written. Notability, if any, can not be established.
411:
410:. No secondary sources. Not easy finding good ones in English, but
432:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
276:
The page creator left this comment on my user talk page. —
108:
104:
100:
164:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
442:). No further edits should be made to this page.
178:
8:
204:Note: This debate has been included in the
206:list of India-related deletion discussions
203:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
425:23:34, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
399:17:27, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
61:06:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
375:22:16, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
348:15:30, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
316:20:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
286:10:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
269:23:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
252:21:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
231:The articled was CSDed for
221:20:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
198:20:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
459:
435:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
367:Accusativen hos Olsson
261:Accusativen hos Olsson
355:It would appear that
44:The result was
319:
302:comment added by
223:
209:
59:
450:
437:
361:reliable cources
346:
340:
318:
296:
250:
244:
210:
183:
182:
168:
116:
98:
58:
56:
49:
34:
458:
457:
453:
452:
451:
449:
448:
447:
446:
440:deletion review
433:
336:
332:
297:
240:
236:
125:
89:
73:
70:
52:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
456:
454:
445:
444:
428:
427:
401:
380:
379:
378:
377:
364:
350:
323:
322:
321:
320:
292:
271:
254:
225:
224:
186:
185:
122:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
455:
443:
441:
436:
430:
429:
426:
422:
418:
413:
409:
405:
402:
400:
396:
392:
391:
385:
382:
381:
376:
372:
368:
365:
363:on Knowledge.
362:
358:
354:
351:
349:
345:
344:
342:
341:
339:
330:
327:
326:
325:
324:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
293:
289:
288:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
270:
266:
262:
258:
255:
253:
249:
248:
246:
245:
243:
234:
230:
227:
226:
222:
218:
214:
207:
202:
201:
200:
199:
195:
191:
181:
177:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
131:
128:
127:Find sources:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
57:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
434:
431:
403:
388:
383:
356:
352:
337:
335:
333:
328:
298:— Preceding
273:
256:
241:
239:
237:
228:
187:
175:
169:
161:
154:
148:
142:
136:
126:
75:Kulshreshtha
67:Kulshreshtha
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
152:free images
408:WP:PRIMARY
278:Tom Morris
213:Tom Morris
190:Tom Morris
54:Sandstein
357:77.mayank
304:77.mayank
412:this one
353:Comment:
338:Fιnεmαnn
329:Comment:
312:contribs
300:unsigned
274:Comment:
242:Fιnεmαnn
119:View log
417:BusterD
257:Delete:
229:Delete:
158:WP refs
146:scholar
92:protect
87:history
404:Delete
130:Google
96:delete
46:delete
395:talk
173:JSTOR
134:books
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
421:talk
406:Per
384:Keep
371:talk
308:talk
282:talk
265:talk
217:talk
194:talk
166:FENS
140:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
390:DGG
180:TWL
117:– (
423:)
397:)
373:)
314:)
310:•
284:)
267:)
233:A7
219:)
208:.
196:)
160:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
419:(
393:(
369:(
306:(
280:(
263:(
215:(
211:—
192:(
184:)
176:·
170:·
162:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
137:·
132:(
124:(
121:)
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.