304:- Closed as a unanimous keep in May 2008. I went back and took a look at that version to see if the article has deteriorated since. I'm not seeing what people were so sure about. Sourcing showing is trivial and the piece strikes me as promotional in intent. He seems to be a You Tube New Age Mysticism personality. I'm not seeing multiple independently published sources dealing substantially with him, however. As a such, fails GNG.
250:
254:
214:
Couldn't find significant coverage in reliable sources. The entire article consists of a collection of quotes, from small local newspapers and "Horoscope
Magazine". One such quote was "Renowned teacher and lecturer...Beckman teaches the scientific application of gems to balance harmony in life"
246:
183:
82:
345:: Fails all notability requirements. Multiple Google searches turned up nothing even faintly promising in the way of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. The sources used all fail
368:: I don't know how this page lasted so long. Sharing a guru with the Beatles, no doubt along with thousands of other devotees, is not worth mentioning and certainly not notable.
136:
281:
177:
77:
143:
322:
238:
242:
237:- Non-notable at this time and, as mentioned, the article promotes him. I was unable to retrieve the first dead URL link but I retrieved the
253:(I should note that the block of text is promotional and the above pages suggest it is part of a directory) and another minor mention
109:
104:
113:
377:
358:
334:
313:
293:
272:
228:
61:
258:
96:
17:
198:
165:
241:, but it appears that it is minor. Considering that gemology is a science, I searched with Google Scholar but was
396:
354:
40:
159:
267:
155:
100:
392:
57:
36:
205:
350:
92:
67:
289:
262:
224:
191:
330:
309:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
391:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
373:
171:
53:
349:
by a wide mile. Also appears to be promotional in nature. Can be deleted in its entirety.
285:
220:
216:
346:
326:
305:
130:
369:
257:. Considering that astrology isn't a true science, he wouldn't pass
249:
provides a vague description of a book's text, one minor mention
385:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
126:
122:
118:
190:
83:
Articles for deletion/Howard
Beckman (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
399:). No further edits should be made to this page.
219:, indicates the dubious nature of the sourcing)
282:list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions
204:
8:
321:Note: This debate has been included in the
280:Note: This debate has been included in the
323:list of People-related deletion discussions
320:
279:
245:. Google Books found several mentions,
75:
7:
78:Articles for deletion/Howard Beckman
74:
24:
259:Knowledge:Notability (academics)
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
378:16:13, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
359:18:37, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
62:01:03, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
335:19:48, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
314:16:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
294:09:04, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
273:02:31, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
229:00:39, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
416:
388:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
261:as an astrologist.
48:The result was
337:
296:
407:
390:
270:
265:
209:
208:
194:
146:
134:
116:
34:
415:
414:
410:
409:
408:
406:
405:
404:
403:
397:deletion review
386:
351:Dominus Vobisdu
268:
263:
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
413:
411:
402:
401:
381:
380:
362:
361:
339:
338:
317:
316:
298:
297:
276:
275:
264:SwisterTwister
212:
211:
148:
93:Howard Beckman
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
68:Howard Beckman
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
412:
400:
398:
394:
389:
383:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
364:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
341:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
319:
318:
315:
311:
307:
303:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
278:
277:
274:
271:
266:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
387:
384:
365:
342:
301:
243:unsuccessful
234:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
49:
47:
31:
28:
239:second link
178:free images
54:Mark Arsten
215:(violates
393:talk page
286:IRWolfie-
221:IRWolfie-
37:talk page
395:or in a
137:View log
39:or in a
327:Frankie
306:Carrite
217:WP:NPOV
184:WP refs
172:scholar
110:protect
105:history
370:Kooky2
366:Delete
343:Delete
302:Delete
235:Delete
156:Google
114:delete
50:delete
347:WP:RS
199:JSTOR
160:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
374:talk
355:talk
331:talk
325:. —
310:talk
290:talk
269:talk
255:here
251:here
247:this
225:talk
192:FENS
166:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
58:talk
206:TWL
135:– (
376:)
357:)
333:)
312:)
292:)
284:.
227:)
186:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:)
52:.
372:(
353:(
329:(
308:(
288:(
223:(
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
140:·
133:)
95:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.