807:: "There are 7,000 people living in Wasilla, but it services about 50,000," as they quoted Keller in 2008. The city museum's page on Wasilla history says much the same thing: "The current city resident population is 7,028 with a conservatively estimated population of more than 80,000 adjacent Borough residents who patronize the Wasilla business and commercial center". I pointed out much the same thing in that AFD, a point which was aggressively avoided so that a slew of forum shopping and other actions in a related vein could occur. The end result? The small population of Wasilla within its corporate limits was used as an excuse to remove a whole host of content actually related to the city of Wasilla, which was replaced with a photo of a NRHP site located a dozen miles or more outside city limits. Many of you love playing the same tired old XFD game where slivers of content are expected to exist in a vacuum. There may be some of us worried about the bigger picture and how it's providing us with justification or lack thereof for the amount of time we devote to this project. Using deletion processes to try and force others to only acknowledge certain topics and certain sources certainly plays into that. In the real world, they call such an approach a "controlled narrative".
801:. Today's Google search isn't making this as easy to find as it was on the day I commented in that AFD, but I remember a real gem. One of the hotshit national journalists who descended upon Wasilla in September 2008 included in their story a quote from Keller that Wasilla was incorporated as a second-class city in 1974, but that she didn't know when it became a first-class city. What devotion to fact-checking, considering that last I checked, the local library (hey, whaddyaknow!) is in a lot more central location in Wasilla than is City Hall, and that five or ten minutes' worth of research at the most would have yielded the answer. I can only guess that hotshit national journalists consider it beneath them to speak to locals unless the purpose is to get a quote for a story. In today's Google search, I did find this from
777:
indiscriminate, because they cover everything from the area, whether or not of encyclopedic significance. To put this in perspective, this is a very small city of 5,000 population, which strikes me as more appropriately thought of as a village. The only possible special feature here is the building. But LEED silver certification (the 2nd lowest class of LEED certification) is nowadays fairly routine for public buildings --if the building is otherwise notable, we include it. The building has won only state awards, and has not gotten national attention. WP already has an article on the community, and that single sentence can be expanded a little.
855:
that information with the sources I see present in the article, especially about the library's early history, I guess the old Jimbo chestnut about "the sum total of human knowledge" is in reality "the sum total of human knowledge as found lying around on the web on one particular day or another within portions of the 21st century". The one book source I remember best was published by the
859:. Are you gonna try and claim that to be a garbage source despite the fact that they typically employ an editorial process? That delves into another aspect of trying to exist in a vacuum, namely that folks are capable of noticing when fellow editors interchangeably view local sources as perfectly acceptable when it suits their purposes or garbage when it suits their purposes.
526:- Look through past Afd , same nominator, same kind of starting "this is my library, but I don't think it should be an article, the the other people (after relisting once) managed to find sources. Then say GNG meet. Then closed as keep. This pattern is almost identical here. For clarity, let us just use normal GNG criteria.
380:
I seem to remember that a submission went through AFC covering the library system in
Anchorage, which was allowed to be buried and deleted by AFC without any checks and balances by the greater community, something which happens entirely too often with AFC submissions. So your statement about library
854:
If you really love your local library, you would have already come across the book sources that I glance at every now and then which state that Homer's library had an unusually large collection in its early days for such a remote and lightly populated community and such a new library. Contrasting
443:
local libraries, which exist all over the good old US of A. LEED certification is all good, but does not make it notable, because there will be more LEED certified libraries popping up. It is also not a competitive contest, any building meeting the requirements will get the certification (kind of
776:
local libraries in small communities may be important in the life of that local community, but they do not usually have the general significance to warrant separate articles. As would be expected, there are mostly local sources here, with two regional sources; such source are considered
299:. I added a small history section and will try to find some other things to add. It's a nicely written article and I can't think of a good reason to deprive readers of reliably sourced information about a public library, no matter how small.
461:
this subject has been through AFD twice already and both times closed as clear "keep" -- I see no new information introduced here as the argument of "it's small" was already made. I'm seeing some sources that appear to pass
192:
745:
WP:AUD clearly states only 1 regional or higher paper is needed. The
Fairbanks sources are regional, almost to the point of statewide, far from Homer, AK, and clearly meet this requirement. So that rule has been met.
90:
85:
223:
This is my local library. I love it. A lot. But I am not convinced by either the sources used or the previous deletion discussions that it really is notable. Yes, it was one of the first libraries in Alaska to be
798:
356:
to be notable, it takes a lot more to convince me that a standalone library meets that same criteria. To me, this page could be a little stronger, but it's enough to pass GNG, and therefore I vote to keep.
534:
245:
80:
186:
416:
641:
and that with a little more time in the rearview the LEED certification is not such a big deal as to confer automatic notability, which was a point argued at previous AFDs.
152:
145:
262:
225:
348:, especially after the information I've added about their Top Drawer Collection. This topic is also covered enough (especially with the LEED status) to pass
52:. With current and additional sources, consensus is clear to keep. A potential merger to the town's article can always be discussed on the talk page.
118:
113:
723:) 08:33, 15 May 2018 (UTC) can't you see the main criteria WP:ORGCRIT than the subpart at audience. I will say no more and let an admin determine
122:
537:
228:
certified. I do not believe that confers automatic notability. Other than that the coverage is routine local coverage of the local library.
105:
894:
877:
846:
825:
788:
764:
732:
710:
696:
682:
664:
650:
628:
595:
569:
552:
516:
479:
453:
428:
403:
375:
339:
317:
291:
271:
254:
237:
63:
533:), one significant, independant source and that's it. Others are all dead links, trivial coverage. I will try to search Google till now
352:. I fully agree with all past AfD Keep votes. I do not believe every single library should have its own page. While I believe library
207:
174:
872:
820:
398:
17:
527:
511:
168:
619:
is a ridiculous accusation. What other forum was this brought to? AfD is the appropriate forum for this discussion.--
488:
911:
536:
nothing significant I can find. 1 good source yes I cannot deny. For LEED, this is the page that should be added
164:
109:
40:
890:
424:
214:
756:
475:
367:
309:
885:
There are enough sources in the article, I don't really understand on which grounds they are challenged.
907:
842:
36:
837:
I did a little expand, source. Several statewide sources. Coverage of the new building meets WP:GNG.
646:
335:
287:
233:
101:
69:
382:
866:
814:
803:
616:
540:
467:
392:
326:
That’s basically a argument to have an article on every single public library on earth, based on a
266:
249:
200:
724:
716:
688:
656:
544:
180:
886:
856:
445:
420:
466:
to me so I don't see any policy violation. Without any new reason, this looks a whole lot like
747:
728:
720:
692:
660:
579:
565:
548:
471:
358:
349:
300:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
906:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
838:
706:
678:
624:
591:
449:
345:
642:
560:. Sourced, reasonable article. The fact this is 3rd AFD about it is a tad irritating. --
507:
331:
283:
229:
58:
860:
808:
440:
386:
327:
637:
I don’t know what that was brought up either. My thinking was more along the lines of
784:
670:
638:
612:
608:
583:
463:
687:
the page and my comments have other sources, wp:corpdepth requirements clearly met
561:
615:. The last AfD was four years ago, it is not unreasonable to revisit it now. Also
139:
702:
674:
620:
587:
498:
53:
539:. Marginal source but LEED is an award that cannot be discarded. He is not
669:
One source is a bare minimum, there really should be multiple sources for
779:
344:
Sorry, allow me to elaborate my position. The page is congruent with
799:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Dianne M. Keller (4th nomination)
444:
like graduating from a school versus winning an
Olympic medal).
902:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
491:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
797:
This reminds me of another AFD initiated by the nominator,
701:
No, its not clearly met, all the other sources are local.--
91:
Articles for deletion/Homer Public
Library (3rd nomination)
86:
Articles for deletion/Homer Public
Library (2nd nomination)
246:
list of
Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions
135:
131:
127:
199:
715:minimum is two in depth source, one local at most.
497:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
607:- with all local sources, coverage does not meet
417:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
914:). No further edits should be made to this page.
415:Note: This discussion has been included in the
261:Note: This discussion has been included in the
244:Note: This discussion has been included in the
282:. Smallish public library. Zero notability. --
213:
8:
263:list of Alaska-related deletion discussions
414:
260:
243:
81:Articles for deletion/Homer Public Library
655:did you see my post above with ap source?
78:
7:
76:
24:
543:but just no solid arguments. --
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
381:systems is nice to read, but "
1:
931:
904:Please do not modify it.
895:02:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
878:01:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
847:21:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
826:01:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
789:16:59, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
765:13:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
733:08:37, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
711:00:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
697:00:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
683:00:36, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
665:00:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
651:00:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
629:23:52, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
596:00:56, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
570:22:35, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
404:01:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
64:14:50, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
553:22:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
517:21:47, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
480:19:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
454:18:39, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
429:05:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
376:01:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
340:23:30, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
318:17:49, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
292:12:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
272:11:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
255:11:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
238:11:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
75:AfDs for this article:
639:consensus can change
102:Homer Public Library
70:Homer Public Library
804:The Weekly Standard
868:Talk to me, Billy
857:Pioneers of Alaska
816:Talk to me, Billy
394:Talk to me, Billy
760:
752:
519:
431:
383:where's the beef?
371:
363:
313:
305:
274:
257:
922:
875:
869:
863:
823:
817:
811:
758:
750:
503:
496:
494:
492:
401:
395:
389:
369:
361:
311:
303:
269:
252:
218:
217:
203:
155:
143:
125:
34:
930:
929:
925:
924:
923:
921:
920:
919:
918:
912:deletion review
873:
867:
861:
821:
815:
809:
611:requirement of
520:
515:
499:
487:
485:
399:
393:
387:
385:", so to speak?
267:
250:
160:
151:
116:
100:
97:
95:
73:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
928:
926:
917:
916:
898:
897:
880:
874:Transmissions
849:
831:
830:
829:
828:
822:Transmissions
792:
791:
774:Merge to town.
770:
769:
768:
767:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
653:
632:
631:
601:
600:
599:
598:
573:
572:
555:
505:
495:
484:
483:
482:
456:
433:
432:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
400:Transmissions
321:
320:
294:
276:
275:
258:
221:
220:
157:
96:
94:
93:
88:
83:
77:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
927:
915:
913:
909:
905:
900:
899:
896:
892:
888:
887:wikitigresito
884:
881:
879:
876:
870:
864:
858:
853:
850:
848:
844:
840:
836:
833:
832:
827:
824:
818:
812:
806:
805:
800:
796:
795:
794:
793:
790:
786:
782:
781:
775:
772:
771:
766:
762:
761:
754:
753:
744:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
713:
712:
708:
704:
700:
699:
698:
694:
690:
686:
685:
684:
680:
676:
672:
668:
667:
666:
662:
658:
654:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
635:
634:
633:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
603:
602:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
576:
575:
574:
571:
567:
563:
559:
556:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
535:
532:
528:
525:
522:
521:
518:
513:
509:
504:
502:
493:
490:
481:
477:
473:
472:Paul McDonald
469:
465:
460:
457:
455:
451:
447:
442:
438:
435:
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:Coolabahapple
418:
413:
405:
402:
396:
390:
384:
379:
378:
377:
373:
372:
365:
364:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
324:
323:
322:
319:
315:
314:
307:
306:
298:
295:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:
277:
273:
270:
264:
259:
256:
253:
247:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
216:
212:
209:
206:
202:
198:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
166:
163:
162:Find sources:
158:
154:
150:
147:
141:
137:
133:
129:
124:
120:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
98:
92:
89:
87:
84:
82:
79:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
61:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
903:
901:
882:
851:
834:
802:
778:
773:
757:
748:
617:WP:FORUMSHOP
604:
578:sounds like
557:
541:WP:FORUMSHOP
530:
523:
500:
486:
468:WP:FORUMSHOP
458:
436:
368:
359:
353:
310:
301:
296:
279:
222:
210:
204:
196:
189:
183:
177:
171:
161:
148:
59:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
839:E.M.Gregory
751:EMMENDINGER
512:revolutions
362:EMMENDINGER
304:EMMENDINGER
187:free images
862:RadioKAOS
810:RadioKAOS
643:Beeblebrox
582:See also,
580:WP:ILIKEIT
388:RadioKAOS
350:WP:GEOFEAT
332:Beeblebrox
330:argument.
284:Necrothesp
230:Beeblebrox
908:talk page
531:not local
346:WP:ORGSIG
37:talk page
910:or in a
489:Relisted
268:MT Train
251:MT Train
146:View log
39:or in a
725:Quek157
717:Quek157
689:Quek157
657:Quek157
562:Doncram
545:Quek157
508:spin me
441:WP:ROTM
354:systems
328:WP:LIKE
193:WP refs
181:scholar
119:protect
114:history
703:Rusf10
675:Rusf10
671:WP:AUD
621:Rusf10
613:WP:ORG
609:WP:AUD
605:Delete
588:Rusf10
584:WP:CCC
529:= AP (
464:WP:GNG
446:Acnetj
437:Delete
280:Delete
165:Google
123:delete
785:talk
501:78.26
208:JSTOR
169:books
153:Stats
140:views
132:watch
128:links
16:<
891:talk
883:Keep
852:Keep
843:talk
835:Keep
759:talk
729:talk
721:talk
707:talk
693:talk
679:talk
661:talk
647:talk
625:talk
592:talk
566:talk
558:Keep
549:talk
524:Keep
476:talk
459:Keep
450:talk
425:talk
370:talk
336:talk
312:talk
297:Keep
288:talk
234:talk
226:LEED
201:FENS
175:news
136:logs
110:talk
106:edit
50:keep
780:DGG
470:.--
215:TWL
144:– (
60:Why
893:)
845:)
787:)
763:)
731:)
709:)
695:)
681:)
673:--
663:)
649:)
627:)
594:)
586:--
568:)
551:)
510:/
478:)
452:)
439:-
427:)
419:.
374:)
338:)
316:)
290:)
265:.
248:.
236:)
195:)
138:|
134:|
130:|
126:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
55:So
889:(
871:/
865:/
841:(
819:/
813:/
783:(
755:(
749:S
727:(
719:(
705:(
691:(
677:(
659:(
645:(
623:(
590:(
564:(
547:(
514:)
506:(
474:(
448:(
423:(
397:/
391:/
366:(
360:S
334:(
308:(
302:S
286:(
232:(
219:)
211:·
205:·
197:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
172:·
167:(
159:(
156:)
149:·
142:)
104:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.