561:
of good references on school drop out policy and statistics are out there. There are good workarounds, and since the editor who created the article is new perhaps coaching from experienced editors can help the process. The doubled pending deletion notices aren't the friendliest welcome I've seen for a newbie talk page. It could be an instructor is using WP as a class project or something, and presumably not every student can do A+ work on the wikipedia with their first article creation.
560:
for nurturing to encyclopedic form. The article does veer off and gets lost in opinion, but it's a laudable topic to write about drop out and this is just first attempt at an article on the topic. But the title doesn't need saving, and I'm not keen on putting it in "dropping out" either. Plenty
213:
These are very odd; they've all been created by SPAs (one for each). Not enough for ], most likely, but I suspect they are all the same editor due to the identical style. In other words I wouldn't call it a "trend" but possible evidence of POV-pushing.
183:
This new trend of articles is troubling, from an encyclopediac standpoint, so I wanted to ensure a wider review than just having it slink off into deletion a few weeks out. The five AFDs currently up will be a good barometer on this new trend.
518:
I have a question: could this possibly be a school project or something? Like an assignment by an adamant teacher that wants his students to post this project on the internet or specificly
Knowledge? I mean considering these were all made by
690:" essays, these are personal notes. The editor is however apparently familiar with the subjects at hand, and should thus be encouraged to integrate the information from those essays into the appropriate articles. --
92:
87:
96:
79:
737:
Thanks, that makes more sense. Knowledge's been welcoming of editors introduced through course work-in this case they don't quite have the concept of "encyclopedia article" clear yet.
125:
497:
351:. The material in the annotated bibliography is suitable for inclusion as references, and this is not original research in the sense of someone's new theory. --
767:
746:
725:
699:
667:
649:
621:
603:
584:
570:
550:
532:
509:
487:
448:
431:
406:
387:
360:
337:
309:
271:
251:
222:
204:
174:
152:
61:
713:
132:
Delete. This is an apparent essay, written in violation of our OR/synth policies. Knowledge is does not publish original thought in this manner.
546:
427:
245:
198:
146:
83:
640:
I'm curious then why there is no evidence of this whatsoever on the user's talk page. What makes the user a multiple offender?
75:
67:
528:
481:
305:
260:
Maybe all from the same class? It is getting towards the end of the college semester, so final papers and such might be due soon. --
17:
742:
645:
617:
566:
575:
The section titled "Fixing the problem" places this article clearly in the domain of journalism, not an encyclopedia.
496:: to date, eight similar articles have been created within a short timeframe. There is ongoing discussion about them
415:
785:
738:
641:
613:
562:
542:
423:
36:
784:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
374:. This is simply a personal essay/notes. While it could be used for research in other articles, it's certainly
239:
192:
140:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
594:
as a WP:NOT multiple offender. Author should have known better, we're not the least bit obligated to keep it.
763:
634:
599:
580:
473:
55:
538:
419:
709:
729:
ps: not likely a multiple offender, but apparently all SPA accounts of students of the same course.
233:
186:
134:
721:
695:
383:
356:
219:
663:
505:
444:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
759:
630:
595:
576:
524:
465:
402:
301:
50:
324:
294:
537:
You may very well be right about that. I can't think of a more plausible explanation.
231:
Awfully odd POV push, if thats the case... some of the topics aren't exactly related.
717:
691:
655:
520:
457:
379:
375:
352:
290:
215:
162:
659:
501:
440:
348:
327:
320:
298:
261:
113:
708:" essays, these are apparently dumps from a University of Florida course. (cf. "
398:
658:
applied, not that the article creator had previously 'offended'.
778:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
705:
687:
120:
109:
105:
101:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
788:). No further edits should be made to this page.
76:High school dropouts: an annotated bibliography
68:High school dropouts: an annotated bibliography
654:I read that to mean that multiple elements of
8:
161:, no real need to bring it here just yet.
414:as essay and synthesis. Maybe we need a
686:or move to user space. Like the other "
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
805:
768:09:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
747:14:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
726:19:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
700:19:25, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
668:15:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
650:14:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
622:03:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
604:02:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
585:02:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
571:00:54, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
551:03:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
533:17:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
510:09:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
488:09:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
449:09:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
432:02:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
407:01:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
388:00:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
361:23:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
338:21:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
310:20:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
272:21:03, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
252:20:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
223:20:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
205:20:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
175:19:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
159:Already prodded previously
153:19:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
62:02:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
706:An Annotated Bibliography
688:An Annotated Bibliography
612:Repeat offender? How so?
781:Please do not modify it.
704:Like the various other "
416:WP:ANNOTATEDBIBLIOGRAPHY
32:Please do not modify it.
521:single purpose accounts
758:, original research.
739:Professor marginalia
642:Professor marginalia
614:Professor marginalia
563:Professor marginalia
523:it seems plausible
558:Move to user space
372:Move to user space
730:
531:
512:
486:
485:
477:
469:
321:original research
308:
299:original research
796:
783:
728:
712:" at the end of
710:About the author
527:
492:
479:
471:
463:
461:
456:as violation of
397:not an article.
335:
332:
304:
269:
266:
250:
248:
242:
236:
203:
201:
195:
189:
151:
149:
143:
137:
123:
117:
99:
58:
53:
44:The result was
34:
804:
803:
799:
798:
797:
795:
794:
793:
792:
786:deletion review
779:
539:JeremyMcCracken
420:JeremyMcCracken
378:for mainspace.
376:not appropriate
333:
328:
267:
262:
246:
240:
234:
232:
199:
193:
187:
185:
147:
141:
135:
133:
119:
90:
74:
71:
56:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
802:
800:
791:
790:
773:
771:
770:
752:
751:
750:
749:
732:
731:
703:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
607:
606:
589:
588:
587:
555:
554:
553:
513:
490:
451:
434:
409:
391:
390:
364:
363:
341:
340:
313:
312:
291:personal essay
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
255:
254:
235:Lawrence Cohen
226:
225:
208:
207:
188:Lawrence Cohen
178:
177:
170:
167:
136:Lawrence Cohen
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
801:
789:
787:
782:
776:
775:
774:
769:
765:
761:
757:
754:
753:
748:
744:
740:
736:
735:
734:
733:
727:
723:
719:
716:article). --
715:
711:
707:
702:
701:
697:
693:
689:
684:
681:
680:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
652:
651:
647:
643:
639:
638:
636:
632:
628:
625:
624:
623:
619:
615:
611:
610:
609:
608:
605:
601:
597:
593:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
573:
572:
568:
564:
559:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
522:
517:
514:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
489:
484:
483:
476:
475:
468:
467:
459:
455:
452:
450:
446:
442:
438:
435:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
410:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:
365:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
342:
339:
336:
331:
326:
322:
318:
315:
314:
311:
307:
303:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
284:
273:
270:
265:
259:
258:
257:
256:
253:
249:
243:
237:
230:
229:
228:
227:
224:
221:
217:
212:
211:
210:
209:
206:
202:
196:
190:
182:
181:
180:
179:
176:
173:
172:
171:
168:
165:
160:
157:
156:
155:
154:
150:
144:
138:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
60:
59:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
780:
777:
772:
755:
685:
682:
626:
591:
557:
515:
493:
480:
472:
464:
453:
436:
411:
394:
371:
367:
349:Dropping out
344:
329:
316:
293:filled with
286:
263:
164:
163:
158:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
760:KleenupKrew
631:WillOakland
596:WillOakland
577:WillOakland
525:Doc Strange
466:TreasuryTag
302:Doc Strange
629:offender.
439:per nom.
325:synthesis
718:Fullstop
692:Fullstop
627:Multiple
547:contribs
428:contribs
380:Vassyana
353:Eastmain
319:as pure
216:Dhartung
126:View log
660:Ros0709
529:Logbook
516:Comment
502:Ros0709
441:Ros0709
306:Logbook
93:protect
88:history
756:Delete
683:Delete
656:WP:NOT
592:Delete
458:WP:NOR
454:Delete
437:Delete
412:Delete
399:JuJube
395:Delete
368:Delete
334:figura
317:Delete
287:Delete
268:figura
121:delete
97:delete
57:larity
46:delete
345:Merge
289:as a
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
52:Singu
16:<
764:talk
743:talk
722:talk
714:this
696:talk
664:talk
646:talk
635:talk
618:talk
600:talk
581:talk
567:talk
543:talk
506:talk
498:here
494:Note
445:talk
424:talk
403:talk
384:talk
357:talk
323:and
297:and
295:soap
220:Talk
169:fold
166:Hers
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
545:) (
426:) (
370:or
347:to
766:)
745:)
724:)
698:)
666:)
648:)
637:)
620:)
602:)
583:)
569:)
549:)
508:)
500:.
460:.
447:)
430:)
405:)
386:)
359:)
238:§
218:|
214:--
191:§
139:§
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
48:.
762:(
741:(
720:(
694:(
662:(
644:(
633:(
616:(
598:(
579:(
565:(
541:(
504:(
482:c
478:—
474:t
470:—
462:—
443:(
422:(
418:.
401:(
382:(
355:(
330:B
264:B
247:e
244:/
241:t
200:e
197:/
194:t
148:e
145:/
142:t
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.