272:
as above. It should also be expanded to include other schemes and terms that relate. This is the biggest public activity governments do and the way most of public money is spent. Its important information everyone should have access too with clarity and broaded scope of public
72:
that this term is used in the way described. The sources provided by the author don't use this term and don't establish the author's claim that the pre-qualification criteria are "subjective," which seems the only reason for this particular article to exist.
112:? At the present time there is nothing more than a stub. I agree that the concept should be covered at Knowledge. I am wary of this particular article because it is part of a POV-pushing campaign by its author, who is a bit
254:
as above. Pretty standard system of tendering contracts for specific and technical jobs (ie bridge construction and specialty work) for municipalities and other governments, but this may not be the specific term for it.
304:, which replaced Compulsory Competitive Tendering. Pre-qualification criteria include looking at the contractor's track record including experience of similar projects, which is deemed to be subjective.
144:
article in detail, but pre-qualification lists such as S-Cat deserve reference, as do any
Canadian variations. But I agree with your appraisal of this article as written. Now voting
196:-- One user's made-up category name for government contracts on which only certain suppliers are asked to bid. Might be good for a paragraph under
229:
127:
82:
17:
289:
248:
Right now this article is litte more than a dictionary entry. I think it should just be merged into the "Tenders" article.
177:
95:
Although the phrase is not used in this precise way, I believe this concept exists in UK Government work tendering too.
308:
264:
233:
208:
188:
152:
131:
99:
86:
56:
323:
36:
322:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
62:
277:
225:
123:
78:
260:
285:
171:
149:
96:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
221:
201:
119:
74:
256:
205:
181:
281:
167:
53:
108:
So should the article be moved instead to a more appropriate page or merged with
305:
69:
301:
300:
as above. Agree the overall subject is notable. The UK system is called
244:
197:
141:
109:
49:
166:
looks like a minor local usage. Don't tell me, it's the work of
316:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
204:
that this is part of one user's POV-pushing campaign. --
117:
113:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
326:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
200:but where do you go from there? Agree with
220:he's actually starting to grow on me...
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
343:
140:I haven't scrutinised the
57:15:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
309:21:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
265:20:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
234:20:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
209:14:33, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
189:14:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
153:13:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
132:13:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
100:13:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
87:13:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
319:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
63:Invited public tenders
294:
280:comment added by
263:
334:
321:
293:
274:
259:
185:
68:I was unable to
34:
342:
341:
337:
336:
335:
333:
332:
331:
330:
324:deletion review
317:
275:
183:
66:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
340:
338:
329:
328:
312:
311:
295:
267:
249:
239:
238:
237:
236:
212:
211:
191:
160:
159:
158:
157:
156:
155:
135:
134:
103:
102:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
339:
327:
325:
320:
314:
313:
310:
307:
303:
299:
296:
291:
287:
283:
279:
271:
268:
266:
262:
258:
253:
250:
247:
246:
241:
240:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
215:
214:
213:
210:
207:
203:
199:
195:
192:
190:
187:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
162:
161:
154:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
137:
136:
133:
129:
125:
121:
118:
115:
111:
107:
106:
105:
104:
101:
98:
94:
91:
90:
89:
88:
84:
80:
76:
71:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
318:
315:
297:
276:— Preceding
269:
251:
242:
218:But you know
217:
193:
174:
163:
150:AlexTiefling
145:
97:AlexTiefling
92:
67:
45:
43:
31:
28:
243:Merge into
302:Best value
273:knowledge.
180:), right?
206:Gary Will
186:you know?
182:Just zis
290:contribs
278:unsigned
257:Tony Fox
230:contribs
178:contribs
128:contribs
114:paranoid
93:Comment:
83:contribs
46:redirect
282:WikiWoo
261:(speak)
245:Tenders
198:Tenders
168:WikiWoo
142:Tenders
110:Tenders
50:Tenders
306:Addhoc
194:Delete
164:Delete
146:Delete
70:verify
298:Merge
270:Merge
252:Merge
222:JChap
202:JChap
120:JChap
75:JChap
16:<
286:talk
226:talk
172:talk
124:talk
79:talk
52:. –
184:Guy
54:Avi
48:to
292:)
288:•
232:)
228:•
148:.
130:)
126:•
116:.
85:)
81:•
284:(
224:(
175:·
170:(
122:(
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.