222:
258:
266:
226:
248:
if rewritten to eliminate the promotional tone and add references. There is nothing "medical" about this subject - this is a cosmetic treatment for the dubiously existing problem of "cellulite" - but that's not what determines whether we keep the article; if the subject is notable, we keep it. And it
218:
168:
217:- I reviewed the author's contributions and noticed that they started several useful articles so I believe this is not a hoax. Additionally, Google News received several, although not very useful,
121:
162:
52:. The additional sources found are sufficient to justify this initially unlikely article. I assume it will be expanded with them, as promised in the discussion.
128:
250:
94:
89:
17:
98:
183:
150:
81:
301:
40:
235:
144:
229:
2008 book that mentions it was developed 25 years ago (1983) in France. I'm willing to rewrite the article,
199:
This is a non-notable bogus medical treatment "referenced" only to a deadlinked-page on a spammy website.
297:
140:
36:
282:
240:
221:. All of the results are advert-like but they suggest that this indeed exists. Google Books also found
208:
63:
230:
190:
176:
278:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
296:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
85:
204:
156:
274:
59:
115:
77:
69:
200:
54:
249:
probably is notable. I found credulous but mainstream coverage such as
290:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
111:
107:
103:
175:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
304:). No further edits should be made to this page.
189:
8:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
283:15:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
241:19:03, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
209:17:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
64:00:01, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
321:
215:Keep but possible rewrite
293:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
48:The result was
312:
295:
238:
233:
194:
193:
179:
131:
119:
101:
34:
320:
319:
315:
314:
313:
311:
310:
309:
308:
302:deletion review
291:
263:Chicago Tribune
236:
231:
223:several results
136:
127:
92:
76:
73:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
318:
316:
307:
306:
286:
285:
243:
232:SwisterTwister
197:
196:
133:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
317:
305:
303:
299:
294:
288:
287:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:Sunday Herald
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
247:
244:
242:
239:
234:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
292:
289:
270:
262:
254:
245:
214:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
124:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
255:Vanity Fair
163:free images
78:Ionithermie
70:Ionithermie
225:including
298:talk page
246:Weak keep
37:talk page
300:or in a
275:MelanieN
122:View log
39:or in a
269:in the
261:in the
219:results
201:Peacock
169:WP refs
157:scholar
95:protect
90:history
265:, and
141:Google
99:delete
184:JSTOR
145:books
129:Stats
116:views
108:watch
104:links
60:talk
16:<
279:talk
273:. --
267:this
259:this
251:this
237:talk
227:this
205:talk
177:FENS
151:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
50:keep
253:in
191:TWL
120:– (
55:DGG
281:)
257:,
207:)
171:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
62:)
277:(
203:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
125:·
118:)
80:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.